1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SHRI. KESHAV CEMENTS
AND INFRA LIMITED, BELGAUM, [formerly known as Katwa Udyog Limited] as
at 31st March 2010, Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash Flow
Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. The Company
has changed the name from Katwa Udyog Limited to Shri Keshav Cements
and Infra Limited vide Registrar of Companies Bangalore Certificate
dated: 07-11 -2007. The change in name is intimated to all the State &
Central Government Departments and the change of name is confirmed. The
change of name is also intimated to BSE - Mumbai the approval is still
under their consideration.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India, Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
3. As required by the Companies [Auditors Report] Order, 2003 as
amended by the Companies (Auditors Report)( Amendment) Order, 2004(the
Order), issued by Central Government of India in terms of sub-section
(4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we annex hereto a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
4. Further, to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph
(3) above, we report that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examination of the
in) The Balance sheet, Profit and Loss Account and cash flow statements
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv) In our opinion, the Balance sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956; save the compliance with accounting standards 28
on impairment of assets.
v) On the basis of the written representation received from the
directors, as on 31st March 2010 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors of the company are
disqualified as on 31st March 2010 from being appointed as a director
in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the
Companies Act, 1956;.
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read with significant
accounting policies and other notes thereon subject to notes No v on
accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
a) in the case of Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the Company
as at 31st March 2010,
b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date; and
c) In the case of cash flow statement, of cash flows for the year ended
on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT
Shri. Keshav Cements and Infra Limited [formerly known as Katwa Udyog
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date:
In respect of Fixed Assets:
i. a. The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
b. The Company has physically verified all the assets during the year
in accordance with programme of verification, which in our opinion
provides for physical verification of the Fixed Assets at reasonable
intervals. According to the information and explanations given to us no
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not made any substantial disposal of
assets during the year and therefore the going concern concept is not
d. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company has undertaken expansion of Plant-I. The
expansion work took in the earlier years. The amount spent towards
expansion has been shown as capital work in progress. During the year
the expansion of Plant-I is completed and Company has purchased
additional machinery and spares for an amount of Rs. 1,06,49,888/-
including capitalization of electricity and others and after deducting
modvat credit. The capital work in progress of Rs. 7,66,85,418/- and
net amount of Rs. 1,06,49,888/- totally amounting to Rs. 8,73,35,306/-
has been transferred to Plant and Machinery Plant-I. Similarly, the
Company has additional machinery & spares, capitalized electricity and
other and after deducting modvat credit net amount of Rs. 2,68,25,980/-
has been transferred to Plant and Machinery Plant-H.
In respect of Inventories:
ii. a. As explained to us the management during the year physically
verified the inventories. In our opinion, the frequency of verification
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, The procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and in the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has maintained proper records of its
inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
I a. As iriformed, the company has not granted loans, secured and
unsecured to Companies, Firms or Other parties, covered in the register
maintained under section 301 ofthe Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly,
sub-clause (b)(c) and (d) are not applicable.
b. The Company has taken unsecured loans from directors covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount involved during the year was Rs, 6,17,46,241/-the number
of parties are 5 and year end balance of such loan taken was Rs.
c. In our opinion, the rate ofinterest and other terms and conditions
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 are prima facie, not
prejudicial to the interest ofthe Company.
d. The Company is regular in repaying the principal amount as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
e. The Company has not given loans and advances in the nature of loans
iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size ofthe company and the nature of its business with regards
to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
v. a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are
ofthe opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into a
register in pursuance of section 301 ofthe Companies Act, 1956 have
been so entered.
b) m our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangement have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard
to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
vi. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, the company has accepted public deposits, andithas complied with
the provisions of section 58A,58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the
Companies ( Acceptance of the Deposit) Rules, 1975 with regard to the
deposit accepted from public. No order has been passed by the Company
Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or
any Court or any other tribunal.
vii In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business, but it needs to
viii. It is reported by the management that the Company has appointed Mr.
Manish Astamker, Mumbai, Cost Auditor and has maintained cost records
as required u.s, 209( 1 )(d) of the Companies Act 1956. The Cost
Auditor has issued a certificate stating that the Company has complied
with the requirements as required u.s. 209(1) (d) ofthe Companies Act
ix. According to the records ofthe company, Provident Fund, Investors
Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax,
Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom duty, Excise duty, Cess,
Fringe Benefit Tax and other material statutory dues applicable to it
have been generally regularly deposited during the year with the
appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations
given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of above were in
arrears, as at March 31,2010 for a period of more than six months form
the date on which they became payable.
x. According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no dues of Income Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Sales Tax, Custom Duty,
Excise Tax, and Cess Fringe Benefit Tax, which have not been deposited
on account of any dispute.
xi. The company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and had not incurred cash losses during the financial
year covered by our audit and me immediately preceding financial year.
xii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution, bank or debenture holders.
xiii. Based on our examination of the records and the information and
explanation given to us, the Company has not granted any loans and
advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares,
debentures and other securities.
xiv. In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual
benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of
the order are not applicable to the Company.
xv. In our opinion, as per the information and explanations given to us
the company has not given any guarantee for the loans taken by others.
xvi. In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose
which they were raised.
xviL According to the cash flow statement and other records examined by
us and the information and explanations given to us, on an over all
basis, funds raised on short term basis have prima facie, not been used
during the year for a long term investment (fixed assets etc) other
than temporary deployment pending application.
xviil According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotments of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report the company has not issued any
xx. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
xxi. According to the information and explanation given to us, no fraud
on or by the company has been noticed during the course of our audit
Place: Belgaum C.A. Prabhakar K. Latkan
Dated: 30-04-2010 Chartered Accountant
M No. 200/21730
1083, Ananthashayan galli,