172@29@16@34!~!172@29@0@53!~!|commonstore|commonfiles|moneycontrol_header.php?cid=0&s_cid=0&radar_off=0&is_revamped_header=0&is_responsive=1&sec=PNC_ANNUALREPORT&priceinter=1&frommc=1!~!www|moneycontrol|com!~!|commonstore|commonfiles|moneycontrol_header.php!~!is_mobile=false
Moneycontrol
SENSEX NIFTY
you are here:

Fulford (India) Ltd.

BSE: 506803 | NSE: FULFORD | Series: NA | ISIN: INE521A01017 | SECTOR: Pharmaceuticals

BSE Live

Jul 30, 16:00
2362.00 0.00 (0.00%)
Volume
No Data Available
3,296
  • Prev. Close

    2362.00

  • Open Price

    2350.00

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    0.00 (0)

Fulford (India) is not traded on BSE in the last 30 days

NSE Live

Dec 27, 11:22
105.00 -1.90 (-1.78%)
Volume
No Data Available
92,389
  • Prev. Close

    106.90

  • Open Price

    -

  • Bid Price (Qty.)

    - (0)

  • Offer Price (Qty.)

    - (0)

Fulford (India) is not listed on NSE

Annual Report

For Year :
2015 2014 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Auditor's Report

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Fulford (India) Limited (the company), as at December 31, 2008, the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. 2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order. 4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that: (i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit; (ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books; (iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account; (iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956; (v) On the basis of written representations received from directors as on December 31, 2008 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors are disqualified as on December 31, 2008 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; (vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the notes thereon, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India: (a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at December 31, 2008; (b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and (c) in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date. Annexure to the Auditors Report Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditors Report on the Accounts of Fulford (India) Limited In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the nature of the companys business / activities during the year are such that clauses xiii, xiv, xix, xx are not applicable to the company. 1. In respect of its fixed assets: a. The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets. b. Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the management in accordance with a phased programme of verification by the management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of assets. The discrepancies noticed on such verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account. c. Although some of the fixed assets have been disposed off during the year, in our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the ability of the company to continue as a going concern is not affected. 2. In respect of its inventories: a. As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals during the year. b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business. c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has maintained proper records of its inventories and the discrepancies noticed on such physical verification between physical stock and book records were not material and have been adequately dealt with in the books of account. 3. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not granted or taken any loan secured or unsecured to / from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly sub clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of clause (iii) are not applicable. 4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there exists an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls. 5. In respect of particulars of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956: a. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, particulars of contracts or arrangements that needed to be entered into the register have been so entered. b. According to the information and explanations given to us, where each of such contract or arrangement (excluding those referred to under paragraph 3 above) is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in respect of any party, the contracts or arrangement have been made at prices which are prima facie, reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time; except that in respect of purchase of services, no comparison of prices could be made as the company informed us that there are no comparable market prices / alternate sources of supply. 6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the deposits accepted from the public. 7. In our opinion, the scope of internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management needs to be considerably strengthened in order to make it commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business. 8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account and records maintained by the company relating to the manufacture of formulations, pursuant to the Order made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed records have been maintained and the prescribed accounts are in the process of being made up. We have however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for any other product of the company. 9. According to the information and explanations given to us in respect of statutory and other dues: a. The Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Service tax, Cess and any other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year. Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the amount of cess payable under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956, we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of the company in depositing the same. b. According to the information and explanations given to us, details of disputed sales tax, income-tax dues, excise duty and Drug Price Control Order; which have not been deposited as on December 31,2008 on account of any dispute are given below: Nature of Statute Nature of Dues Central Sales Demand raised by Sales Tax, Tax Act, 1956 Daman due to differences in tax rates. Central Sales Non-Submission of form F for Tax Act, 1956 inter branch transfer. West Bengal Sales Sales tax demand in regular tax Act, 1944 assessment. Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 Demand raised by Sales tax in respect of sample conversion for free distribution to doctors. Rajasthan Sales Sales tax demand in respect Tax Act, 1994 of free goods. Central Excise Act, 1944 Modvat Credit not allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Disallowance on account of undervaluation of closing inventory on account of freight insurance etc. Unproved liabilities (Sales performance commission, legal fees, miscellaneous exp., interest, professional fees, forward exchange contract), foreign traveling expenses, registration fees & contribution to scientific symposium/institutions. Amount in Period to Forum where Rupees which amount dispute is pending relates 6,90,563 1992-93 to Assistant Commissioner 1995-96 Appeals 1,54,690 2000-01 Assistant Commissioner Appeals 7,45,463 2001 -02 & Commercial taxes & 2004-05 Revision Board. 1,72,615 2003-04 Deputy Commissioner (Appeal IV) 1,53,615 2004-05 Sales tax officer. 58,80,600 2001-02 Assistant Commissioner Appeals 29,04,410 A.Y. 1992-93 to Income Tax Appellate 2001-02 Tribunal Nature of Statute Nature of Dues Income Tax Act, 1961 Disallowance on account of undervaluation / write off of inventory and addition u/s 68 in case of security deposits. Income Tax Act, 1961 Disallowance u/s 92CA relating to transfer pricing, un utilised modvat credit & interest on deposits. Income TaxAct, 1961 Disallowance u/s 92CA relating to purchase of raw materials. Drug Price Control Order Demand raised by Government of India for payment into Drug Price Equalisation Account. Amount in Period to Forum where Rupees which amount dispute is pending relates 98,39,028 A.Y.2002- 03 Commissioner (Appeals) Income tax 1,91,80,717 A.Y.2003- 04 Commissioner (Appeals) and A. Y. 2004-05 Income tax 1,95,64,664 A.Y. 2005-06 Commissioner (Appeals) Income tax 1,94,62,000 1979-84 Supreme Court There were no disputed dues in respect of Custom duty, Wealth tax, and Service tax during the year. 10. The company does not have any accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses during the current and the immediately preceding financial year. 11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. The company has not obtained any borrowings from any financial institutions or by way of debentures. 12. Based on our examination of documents and records, the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. 13. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions. 14. The company has not obtained any term loans during the year. 15. According to the information and explanations given to us, and on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, funds raised on short term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the year for long term investment. 16. According to the information and explanations given to us, during the year, the company has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. 17. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanation given to us, no fraud on or by the company was noticed or reported during the year. For DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS Chartered Accountants K. A. Katki Partner Mumbai, February 23, 2009 Membership No. 038568