HOME > MENTORADE > SPECIAL REPORTS

India needs low interest rates, reforms to grow: Adi Godrej

Jun 20 2012, 17:40   |   By CNBC-TV18

(14) Comments Print  

The Indian economy needs both lower interest rates and government reforms to grow and lure foreign investment says CII president and Godrej group chairman Adi Godrej in a discussion on CNBC-TV18, along with HDFC vice-chairman and CEO Keki Mistry and former RBI governor, Rakesh Mohan.

Below is an edited transcript of the discussion on CNBC-TV18. Also watch the accompanying videos.

Q: The argument that both government and the industry are making is that investment cycle is a function of interest rates. The RBI has retaliated by saying that investment cycle is not merely a function of interest rates. Do you believe the logic that industry is giving and the explanation from the RBI?

Mohan: In the last few years, both the industry and the government think that investment and interests rates are like a hydraulic system where you suddenly decrease the policy interest rate from the central bank and then interest rates will automatically shoot down in the economy and therefore economy will start gaining.

The economy is a much more complex mechanism which I though we used to understand much better. Consumer price inflation is around plus 10%, that it's clearly very difficult for banks to reduce deposit rates. A large market borrowing programme is required to encounter large government fiscal deficit. Midium and long-term rates are determined by large borrowing programme.

Q: Can you blame the RBI for delivering a status quo policy?

Mistry: One can't blame the RBI for delivering a status quo policy. One would have liked to see some reduction in CRR more than a reduction in interest rates as the liquidity is running tight with Rs 75,000-80,000 crore negative in the system.

Easing of liquidity would have been a big boost to confidence. All this while RBI has been focusing on inflation. Inflation has not come down and is not even likely to come down because of constraints in supply side and second the currency.

In March, oil prices were USD 120 per barrel and rupee was 48. Today, oil prices is USD 97-98 per barrel and the rupee has depreciated, not appreciated. So, we are not getting the advantage of falling commodity price globally because of the weak currency.

Q: Industry is clearly disappointed with the fact that the Reserve Bank has decided not to move on the CRR or the repo rate. But the Reserve Bank's argument is that investment cycle is not merely a function of what it does to interests rates, it has to worry about inflation. Inflation is raging at over 10%. There was no choice for the Reserve Bank, but to not move on rates.

Godrej: No, I don't agree with that interpretation. I think the WPI is only around 7%. Inflation has come down. Most importantly, inflationary expectations are down because global commodity prices are coming down, especially crude oil.

We are very disappointed that RBI has not lowered the interest rate or the CRR because the lack of funding, especially for small and medium enterprises and the high interest rates are clearly coming in the way of investment and therefore, production and GDP growth.

Q: There is a ray of hope that capping of oil subsidies, perhaps partial deregulation of diesel etc will happen; they may perhaps move other crucial pending reforms as well. We heard from Kaushik Basu that the government could perhaps move on things like FDI in retail. But if that wasn't to be the case and if the inflation data, expected in July, was to look ugly, do you think the possibility of the RBI cutting rates on July 31 is pretty much ruled out?

Mohan: Given what governor has stated this morning, it would be logical. But I would still further add that there is excessive importance being given to such rate actions by the RBI. If the other actions are not taken, even if the governor takes such actions as he did indeed in April, there will be no effect on interest rates.

_PAGEBREAK_

Q: As far as liquidity is concerned, the Reserve Bank says that they will use the OMO window and other appropriate instruments as and when required. They are pretty much going out and saying that liquidity continues to be an issue that we will manage.

Mistry: I think that will be very positive, if they continue with the OMO programme. If enough liquidity is injected in the system, it is going to enable our banks to cut rates. A mere interest rate cut by RBI would not really have helped banks in cutting interest rates on their own loans because at the end of the day there is a limited amount that we borrow from RBI.

But enough liquidity in the system will enable them to cut deposit rates and that would enable them to pass the benefit back to borrowers by reducing lending rates. So, through OMO operations, if liquidity can be injected in the system, I think it will be very positive.

Q: But if you look at the RBI's argument, it says that it is a front loaded rate action. It gave you 50 bps when no one expected it in April and even that wasn't passed through by the banking system, so would 25 bps really have changed the world for you?

Godrej: It's not a question of changing the world. The present position, which India is in, needs to be corrected. Reforms need to be brought in, interest rates need to be brought down and most importantly CRR should have come down. If the banks are not cutting interest rates, the CRR should be reduced.

Q: What about the possibility of another stimulus, QE3 is being talked about the in US at this point of time and the reserve bank as eluded to the fact that pressures of further stimulus in the global economy could mean commodity prices moving up and that could reignite inflationary pressures across the world and transport those to India. How significant is the possibility of another stimulus likely to impact our policy on July 31?

Mohan: This is a much broader issue that a possible QE3 in United States. Second thing that needs to be watched is what will happen in Europe post Greek election and the resolution or otherwise of the Spain crisis and possibly an Italian crisis.

The governor would advice over the next few weeks to really keep his eyes and ears open or what happens both in Europe and United States if difficulties do arise as a result of these issues.

Both in the Europe and the US then we are able to manage our economy with appropriate liquidity in the system to at least achieve the growth rates that are currently being expected. So I think the governor really has to be focus on these issues rather than the rate cut issue.

Q: Its clearly a wait and watch policy at this point in time, do you anticipate now that the RBI will move when it announces its policy six weeks later, do you believe if the inflation number continues to look bad its pretty much over and done with even on July 31?

Mistry: One should not look only at food inflation as people's food habits will not change whether interest rates are high or low. You need to look at commodity prices and core inflation. In the beginning of the year we said that, we believe that during the course of the year RBI would be able to cut interest rates by about 100 bps.

We already got 50 bps in April itself. So, remaining 50 bps cut is still on the cards. I believe in the H2 of the financial year one will see some action on the part of RBI hopefully if core inflation numbers reduce and currency becomes strong.

Q: The Reserve Bank says that inflation continues to be its number one problem and priority?

Mohan: We saw highest growth between 2003 and 2008 when the average inflation was around 5%, as long as inflation is in 6-7% plus area then regardless of what the central bank does normal interest rates will remain high, investment will be low and therefore growth will be low.

Q: Fitch has revised India's outlook, cutting to negative, similar to what S&P had done and the theme again seems to be lack of structural and policy reforms. It says it understands the predicament of the central bank, why is Indian industry finding it so hard to understand the predicament of the central bank?

Godrej: It is very important that the government acts on reforms and the central bank cuts rates if we want to get growth going. We have enunciated our position, and mentioned it, across the board. We expected rates to reduced, but unfortunately they were not.


Share
(14) Comments Print
Post Your Comment
Comment  
    All comments are moderated
   

Recent Comments (14)

  •  AsVai |   Jun 21 2012,10:12

    The fiscal and monetary policies and actions are only a few of the many other instruments,such as effcient & time-bound implementation of the the projects or welfare schemes, timely policy measure to debottleneck the physical and econmic constraints etc., to manage the economy. These other areas where the Government(s) are seen to be procrastinating, under the halo of poitical compulsions. This is where the trade associations need to focus and help the governmental machinery in quick and fair implemnetaion of the already approved and budgeted programs.

  •  hiteshgadhvi36 |   Jun 19 2012,11:29

    yeah. for balanced in economy its needed very much to use talent more than money to earn money.

  •  Rohit99834 |   Jun 19 2012,11:12

    Nothing changed 600 BC to 2012, EXCEPT rulers and over taxation`s to rob national resource and public funds. Britishers just partied for 200 approx years, worse was Mughal`s who contaminated our 15 generations, rather just killing one generation they raised unholy population with our DIVIDED COUNTRY-AZAD HIND

  •  Guest |   Jun 19 2012,11:08

    HOW INTEREST RATE WILL COME DOWN IF INTEREST RATE WILL COME DOWN MORE SUFFERING WILL COME FOR COMMANMAN BECAUSE INFLATION WILL GO UP AS MORE BUYING POWER WILL COME WITH LOW INTEREST RATE..... FIRST INFLATION HAS TO BE IN CONTROL FOR THAT GOVT HAS TO REDUCE EXPENSES AND STOP HIKING SALARIES AND BANK DOMESTIC DEPOSIT RATE SHOULD BE LITTLE BETTER THEN INFLATION. NRE DEPOSIT RATE SHOULD REDUCE AND DOMESTIC RATE SHOULD HIKE. OTHERWISE DAY BY DAY CAPITAL VALUE WILL REDUCE OF COMMANMAN. DON`T JUST BLAME HIGH INTEREST RATE FIRST TO BE BLAME HIGH INFLATION. FMCG COMPANIES SHOULD REDUCE THE PRICE OF PRODUCT BY CUTTING ADVERTISING OF PRODUCT. BECAUSE OF TOO MUCH ADVERTISING COST OF PRODUCT IS HIGH. MUST REDUCE ADVERTISING AND BRING THE PRICE DOWN. NO NEED TO CRY FOR HIGH INTEREST RATE ONLY.

  •  hiteshgadhvi36 |   Jun 19 2012,11:03

    yeah. for balanced in economy its needed very much to use talent more than money to earn money.

  •  akaj88 |   Jun 19 2012,10:44

    Did we ever really become Independent ? Were we better off under the British Colonial Rule ?. Like in George Orwell `s Classic " Animal Man " Indian Independence has been hijacked by the Vested Interests , Vote Banks ans all pervasive Corruption. Truly , at present , some Indians are MORE EQUAL than others.

  •  akaj88 |   Jun 19 2012,10:40

    No fortnightly Relief for Petrol despite a crash in International Crude Oil because Minister is not in India. , Nearly Rs. 40 Per Litre in Petrol are Taxes ( and Cross subsidies )

  •  akaj88 |   Jun 19 2012,10:29

    Yes , we agree . But unfortunately the country is being run for the interests of Rich Farmers. How quickly decision regarding MSP is made.No Policy Paralysis when interests of Vote Bank are involved .

  •  Rohit99834 |   Jun 19 2012,10:19

    India is sleeping asian elephant. Lazy, communist, copycate, forgotten civilization !! 30 years behind, nothing will change until we change our DNA - Azad Hind

  •  MMB Messenger |   Jun 19 2012,09:17

    India needs low interest rates, reforms to grow: Adi Godrej. Do you agree?

  •  firstchoiceipo |   Jun 19 2012,08:54

    Interest rates are market driven. We are not a communist country.

  •  Guest |   Jun 19 2012,07:07

    In fact India probably needs low interest rates to lower inflation too. Its unconventional policy, but with good cause. RBI did not cut rates as expected by markets. My read of the RBI is that they remain concerned about inflation which remains elevated. They are rightly concerned by inflation. Easing now could add demand side pressure to prices and drive inflation even higher than where it stands; and current levels are driven high by non monetary phenomena (such as lack of a trained labor force of sufficient size relative to potential output, poor supply chain & infrastructure {power, roads, rail, water etc.}, high deficits etc.). On the other hand RBI was concerned about growth, but they felt that interest rates had played a small role in harming growth and thus easing at this point would add more to inflationary pressures than add to growth. While there is a chance that RBI is correct, I believe they misjudged the impact of interest rates on growth. 1. RBI viewed interest rates in the context of high growth years of 2003-2008 and judged that present rates were not high relative to that high growth period and thus the impact of interest rates on growth must be small. It must be other factors such as high fiscal deficits, weak confidence and policy mis-management which are greater contributors to slow growth. The real reverse repo in 2003-2008 averaged 0.13% in real terms, while the 10 year G-sec averaged 1.66% in real terms. This compares to 2012 YTD average rates of (0.04%) and 1.03% for real interest rates on the reverse repo and 10 Y G-sec. What RBI failed to consider is that nominal rates for the reverse repo and 10 Y G-sec have run at 7.25% and 8.38% for 2012 YTD; this compares with 5.36% and 6.97% during 2003-2008 high growth years. Nominals matter; for the investment cycle, nominal interest rates matters more than anything else - particularly in an environment where future inflation is volatile & highly unpredictable. 2. Monetary policy plays an important role in triggering the virtuous cycle of growth. I would argue that the 2003 growth cycle was triggered at least in part by falling interest rates between 2002 and 2004; broadly speaking reverse repo, 10Y G-secs fell in nominal and real terms between 2002 and 2004 and this is important - for the growth cycle, trend or direction of interest rates is more important than level. 3. I also feel that with core inflation contained, there is very little RBI can do to reduce inflation as monetary policy has a very small impact on non core food and energy prices - specially in India where subsidies do not permit proper transmittal of price impact to consumers and as a result demand cannot adjust in response to price changes. That part of inflation which is a monetary phenomenan has already been contained by monetary policy. We are left with structural inflation problems and the correct monetary policy to address structural inflation is to cut interest rates and facilitate investment in supply chain and infrastructure. A rate cut will mean that inflation will remain a risk as there is no doubt that a cut in interest rates could release pent up demand which will add to inflationary pressure. But to an extent, not cutting interest rates will result in deferral of investment in infrastructure, without which supply side inflationary pressures will not abate. Not cutting interest rates now may help present inflation, but at the cost of growth and future structural inflation resulting from under-investment in critical infrastructure. A better policy approach would be to cut interest rates and dis-incentivize consumption by providing incentives for savings & investment in infrastructure. In such circumstances, CPI wont be influenced by incremental demand side pressures coming from the interest rate cuts and in fact, over time a downward pressure on CPI would become evident as investment in supply chain & infrastructure starts addressing that part of inflation arising as a consequence of supply side constraints. So really, perhaps I am crazy; my thinking is certainly outside the box; and perhaps its entirely outside the game park or even playing a different game altogether; but I feel a rate cut will help ease inflation if it is accompanied by measures to tweak the composition of GDP to add share of net exports & investment and reduce the share of consumption and government expenses. I am not suggesting a massive shift from consumption and government expenses to net exports and investment - just a small tweak! In my view it is a minor policy error, which can be rectified as long as rates are adjusted downwards at the next meeting. At this stage, trend or direction is more important than level.

  •  vuppala1948 |   Jun 19 2012,01:24

    I totally agree with Adi Godrej. India needs LOW INTEREST RATES. Chinese and many other countries` products are far cheaper because of LOW INTEREST RATES and consequent LOW COST OF CAPITAL. It will be difficult to compete with them even in India. Indians will buy cheaper Chinese Products in preference to costlier Indian Products. Hence, Interest rates much come down significantly In India.

  •  Economist |   Jun 18 2012,10:46

    Do you agree with the views of the experts?