• Language
  • App
  • Subscriptions
  • Specials
  • Sign-In
  • Register
GeStepAhead GrowMyMoney Invest Now master your money

Feb 13, 2013, 07.32 PM | Source: PTI

Many states differ on provisions of Food Bill

Many states differ on provisions of Food Bill

Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3

Many states differ on provisions of Food Bill

Many states differ on provisions of Food Bill

Post Your Comments

Share Cancel

New Delhi, Feb 13 (PTI) In a setback to Food Security Bill, considered as the world's biggest welfare programme, many of the states today differed on the quantity of subsidised grain to be supplied and the number of beneficiaries to be covered under the scheme. The consultation meeting of state food ministers was organised here to evolve a consensus on recommendations of the Parliamentary panel that suggested drastic changes in the proposed Food Bill, which aims to give legal right over subsidised foodgrains to two-thirds of the population. Tamil Nadu sought complete exemption from the implementation of the bill saying it lacked clarity, while states like Bihar, Orissa, Kerala, Punjab and Gujarat suggested the Centre first modernise Public Distribution System (PDS) before rushing to implement it. Asked if lack of consensus on the Bill will delay Food bill, Union Food Minister K V Thomas said separately, "Except Tamil Nadu, all states have welcomed the bill. Some have expressed reservation on certain provisions. ...we cannot satisfy all states. We intend to present the revised bill in the forthcoming session of Parliament." Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Chhattisgarh pitched for universal public distribution system (PDS), whereas Orissa, Kerala and Bihar, among others, said the foodgrains quantity of 5 kg per person per month suggested by the Parliamentary panel was not sufficient and sought higher allocation. Tamil Nadu Food Minister R Kamaraj said: "I insist that the government should exempt Tamil Nadu from implementation of the proposed Food Bill and allow the state to implement the existing universal PDS as it is more effective". "The bill is replete with confusion and inaccuracy and there is no clarity on identification of beneficiaries". The consultation meeting, attended by 19 states and UTs, saw many states suggesting identification of beneficiaries be left to them. They said it would be difficult to bear additional expenses of implementing the bill due to financial stress. PTI LUX TVS
Buy, Hold, Sell ? Hear it first on M3
Many states differ on provisions of Food Bill

See all

Get started using your favorite social network


Login using moneycontrol ID


Need help logging in? Reset password.

Don´t have an account? Sign Up

Get started using your favorite social network


Simply sign up using this short form

* mandatory


Username should be atleast 4 character


Password should be 8 or more characters,
atleast 1 number, 1 symbol & 1 upper case letter


Your Password should contain
  • 8 or more characters
  • At least 1 number
  • At least 1 symbol
  • At least 1 upper case letter
Confirm Password*
Already have an account? Login