![]() Does the India-Pakistan peace talks have a future?Published on Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 19:07 | Source : Moneycontrol.com Updated at Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 13:37
But India does have a legitimate grievance whether Pakistan or the United States choses to acknowledge that. Predictably, Pakistani MP, Minoo Bhandara says that these accusations are unfounded and that Pakistan is always the first to be picked on everytime something like this happens, even if there is no concrete evidence to prove it. But even Former Indian High Commissioner in Islamabad, G Parthasarthy feels that "we acted prematurely by blaming Pakistan for the Mumbai bomb blasts. We had no evidence at that stage and we have no evidence now. But the earlier bomb blasts - the one in Ayodhya and especially the one in Varanasi - there was clear evidence that the people killed by the security forces were Pakistani nationals." He adds, "Now if the Pakistan government wants evidence, all that they have to do is read the statements made by Hafeez Sayed and what is published in Jamaat ud Dawah's (this is the new name under which Lashkar-e-Toiba has resurfaced) magazines."
Bhandara does have a point to make that by accusing one another, we are just playing into the hands of terrorists, who want this to happen. He also denies that Pakistan does not greenlight terrorists and it annoys Pakistanis, when they keep hearing this. Parthasarthy though, does not agree with Bhandara here and says, "There is a carefully calibrated ruse of (using) terrorism as an instrument of state policy. You read the American state department report on terrorism, which makes it clear that these groups operate not only in J&K but across India and that the Pakistan government is providing assistance to Taliban leaders, who are living in Quetta. So, the complaint is not only from India and what I feel sorry about is that society in Pakistan is going to pay a very heavy price, between what they say and what they do, particularly the military establishment." Both Abdullah and Parthasarthy believe that the Prime Minister should take the peace talks forward by meeting with President Musharraf in Havana or New York (where both are going to be there for the NAM Conference and the UN General Assembly). Even though, Parthasarthy has been something of a sceptic of the peace talks in earlier times, today, he says, he has seen substantive progress happen in the past two years. He says that, President Musharraf now talks about self governance and about coordinating institutions along the line of control and even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has said that borders should be made irrelevant. So, huge improvements have been made.
On the other hand, Bhandara states that at this point of time, everything that Musharraf has offered so far, he's certainly able to deliver it, and all that India has to do is, make the most of this window of opportunity and grab it. So, is India prepared to do that - is the next big question.
PREVIOUS STORY More on Moneycontrol
Headlines
06:15 PM
07:47 PM
08:36 PM
Video of the day
Trending NewsBusiness News
Tags: Jamaat ud Dawah, formerly LeT, Pakistan, terrorism, bomb blasts, President Musharraf, President of the National Conference, Omar Abdullah, Hafeez Sayed, Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, India, Pakistan, Former Indian High Commissioner in Islamabad, G Parthasarthy, Taliban leaders, J&K, Kashmir issue |
NewsVideos
Interviews
![]() Feb 10 2012, 15:43 | Source: CNBC-TV18 ![]() Feb 10 2012, 15:35 | Source: CNBC-TV18 ![]() Subscribe to Moneycontrol Newsletters |
|||||||