Coalgate: CBI differs with Centre on issue of sanction

CBI said there is no requirement of sanction for prosecution in cases where court has either directed investigation or is monitoring investigation of case.
  • Language
  • App
  • Subscriptions
  • Specials
  • Sign-In
  • Register
GeStepAhead GrowMyMoney IThe Winning Leap SME Special
Moneycontrol

Home » News » Politics

Sep 06, 2013, 11.25 AM | Source: PTI

Coalgate: CBI differs with Centre on issue of sanction

CBI said there is no requirement of sanction for prosecution in cases where court has either directed investigation or is monitoring investigation of case.

Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3

Coalgate: CBI differs with Centre on issue of sanction

CBI said there is no requirement of sanction for prosecution in cases where court has either directed investigation or is monitoring investigation of case.

Post Your Comments

Share Cancel

Differing from the Centre, CBI today told the Supreme Court that there was no need for approval or sanction of competent authority in quizzing bureaucrats from the rank of joint secretary in a court-monitored probe like the Coalgate.

Also Read: Coal scam: BJP fumes, PM says don't draw hasty conclusions

The agency made the submission after Attorney General GE Vahanvati said section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, which deals with the issue of approval or sanction to investigate government officers of the rank of joint secretary and above, "has to be complied with until it is struck down by the court".

However, the agency said there is no requirement of sanction for prosecution in cases where court has either directed investigation or is monitoring investigation of case. "The requirement of sanction for prosecution is not mandatory when the same is done pursuant to court direction or where cases are monitored by the court," senior advocate Amarendra Sharan, appearing for the CBI, submitted before a bench headed by justices R M Lodha, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph.

The brief submission of the CBI, which will continue on September 10, came after Vahanvati concluded his arguments by asserting that section 6A of the Act was like a safeguard to protect honest officers from being subjected to harassment. The Attorney General was responding to the two queries put forward by the apex court on July 10 as to why clarification should not be made that sanction from the Government for investigation of the offences alleged to have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption  Act, 1988 is not necessary as it is the stand of the Government that the power of supervision for investigation has already been shifted from the Government to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC).

Buy, Hold, Sell ? Hear it first on M3
Coalgate: CBI differs with Centre on issue of sanction

See all

Get started using your favorite social network

or

Login using moneycontrol ID

Username
Password

Need help logging in? Reset password.

Don´t have an account? Sign Up

Get started using your favorite social network

or

Simply sign up using this short form

* mandatory

UserName*

Username should be atleast 4 character

Password*

Password should be 8 or more characters,
atleast 1 number, 1 symbol & 1 upper case letter

Alert

Your Password should contain
  • 8 or more characters
  • At least 1 number
  • At least 1 symbol
  • At least 1 upper case letter
Confirm Password*
Email
Already have an account? Login