- 08:31 AM Fund Action witnessed in Jindal Poly Films, Ramco ...
- 08:24 AM Market cues: FIIs net sell $14.6 mn
- 08:20 AM F&O cues: Total Futures Open Int up by Rs 982 cror...
- 08:16 AM Asia trading firm; Shanghai Composite, Hang Seng u...
- 08:12 AM Nifty likely to witness range of 5130-5050: Bhambw...
- 08:09 AM Support for Sensex at 17050: Gaba
- 08:01 AM Nifty has support at 4960-5000: Gujral
- 07:56 AM Indian ADRs: ICICI Bank, Satyam down, Tata Comm up
- 07:52 AM US mkts off days low after Fed raised 2010 GDP for...
- 07:22 AM India and US agree on new economic partnership



Surjit Bhalla, Principal O(x)us Investment has a view that fundamentals look quite strong, both domestically and internationally.
Excerpts from the exclsuive interview with Surjit Bhalla:
Q: What have you made of the extremely strong week for the market and what do you think the next few weeks might throw up for equity as a space?
A: It has been one of the best months for the Nifty and for us. Now it will be a difficult to have an encore. But I think fundamentals look quite strong, both domestically and internationally. In domestic, we are obviously going to be looking for what happens to the RBI and interest rates, and globally we would be looking at the US economy, whether it is just as weak as we thought it was.
There are some indications that the September payroll numbers may not be as bad as the August numbers, and we have the earnings season getting underway. So, I think the next month can repeat this performance, of course that will be extraordinary. But I think the next month will be a lot more interesting and perhaps diverse with several different set of inputs. This month market participants were really bearish because the subprime was stacked on either one side or the other, most of them stacked on the sides of the subprime would have an effect on developed economies or the stock markets. So, next month is going to be somewhat more controversial, somewhat more dicey.
Q: What have you made of this gush of money we have got? Do you subscribe to the argument that some kind of liquidity tap has been opening up, in the past few weeks?
A: I am not a big fan of these liquidity tap arguments. I go by the real interest rate and the Fed cut certainly lowered the opportunity cost of money. Therefore, stocks began to look more attractive on the growth side.
The FIIs are coming back in. USD 3 billion or whatsoever is a very small amount of the overall scheme of things. You have got to remember that if you are looking at the FIIs, their total holdings in the Indian market is more than USD 300 billion.
Therefore, if they add USD 3 billion, that is really a very small percentage to the stock of holdings they already have. That is overplayed a bit.
Basically, it is just that they all miscalculated. A lot of them miscalculated the effect of the subprime and were getting back in to stay at even. I would look at the entire episode for September, as one of catch up, by the major funds across the world; who were betting on a real slowdown.
I think a lot of people just misstep in September because of what they thought would be the consequences. What happened in September is a catch up phenomena, by those participants who just grossly miscalculated.
Q: You made the point that October might be a bit tricky. What is it you think that play the joker in the pack; earnings, the RBI or something completely else like politics?
A: Lets start with the last one first. People will err if they give politics too much credence for the domestic market. Independent of what the fundaments or everything else is the politics effect is going to be short lived. My forecast is that there is going to be good news on the political front because the CPM is being or some leadership in the CPM is being exposed to be as hollow as several of us thought it was. So these are paper tigers.
They affected the market one day that was their dream day and after that they’ve are of no consequences or little consequences to the markets. If the markets get affected, then you think of it as a buying opportunity and if they get affected on a positive side, then we got worry about something else. So that takes care of the politics.
The RBI that’s the earnings; we personally feel that the bearishness on technology has been way over done. So for the first time in a long time, we’ve invested somewhat heavily into the technology space because I don’t think the earnings will be as bad as people have made it out to be or thinking that this is the end and there’s no future for technology. In that sense the earnings from the technology space would be somewhat better than what has been anticipated. It may not be better than last time but certainly better than expectation because expectations are way low.
I think the joker in the pack, the RBI and in particular what happens to the rupee and here there is something that fundamental that can potentially de-rail the Indian story and that is if we allow the rupee to appreciate much beyond what it is already done.
Already as of today we are one of the fastest appreciating currencies in the world and we’ve got current account deficit so there’s very little reason relative to other countries for our currencies to appreciate especially with our competitors like China, Singapore, Korea or Taiwan so basically the East Asian countries have appreciated very little so we’ve appreciated substantially against our competitor countries.
What we see or what we saw yesterday was the RBI is concerned. They have opened the tap on if you will fund flows overseas but the major part what RBI can control what it can have an affect on is interest rates and the RBI policy of keeping interest rate high in India has been self defeating.
It is something I have not understood because if you are concerned about the rupee, the last thing you want to do is to make the domestic interest rates higher so people all around the world get a carry trade of 15%.
The RBI has to take cognisance of what it is doing on monetary policy. Interest rates are something it can do. It is under its control and it needs substantially re-thinking by the RBI as to what its monetary policy has been.
Q: Some feel that because of how intense the pessimism on this market was, the unwind will cause us to rally a little bit more. Do you see that as well and by the end of this year, do you see this market at significantly higher levels from where we are trading?
A: Let me continue a little bit on the rupee. There seems to be a view going around that if you have capital account convertibility, then the exchange rate will go wherever it will go. There is very little historical basis for this for other countries. In other words, we can still manage the exchange rate and yet have capital account convertibility.
Both things are very desirable. You have capital account convertibility, so people can bring in money and take out money, which is very desirable. The RBI can manage the exchange rate as it has been doing, as Korea and Singapore are doing. China is obviously doing much more than anybody else. So, it is not as if only China can do it; several other Asian countries have been doing exactly this and are continuing to do this, even countries like Korea.
Therefore, the idea that if you have the capital account convertibility, you cannot have an exchange rate that’s competitive is just false.
There is a question of whether the bearishness will spillover. I think that most of it is out. But the bear may have been sidelined for a few weeks. But I don’t think they have become extinct. There are still several people saying that the sub-prime effect will have a major effect on the US economy and will therefore have an effect on the developing economies, including India. I believe that they will be wrong on both counts.
I do not think the sub-prime will have that major an effect on the US economy. It will slowdown, perhaps for a quarter and perhaps slowdown to about 2% from about 3% average.
It is certainly not a crisis and certainly not enough to affect other countries, including India.
So, I guess that bearishness might still give us a fillip the next month. Earnings, if they turnout to be decent, will be the basis for another fillip upwards. As far as the Indian market is concerned, even at these levels at 17,000, the forward PEs are something like 16 or 17. There has been no expansion in the Indian PE space for the last four years.
I think sometimes that expansion will come. Even if it does not come, because earnings are doing well, we will enjoy a robust stock market. But once that expansion comes, there will be another gap. So, there is a lot of inherent bullishness, fundamental based, fair bullishness in the market. One should not fight it. One can fight it on a trading basis, but really one should not fight it.
All in all, 10% from these levels is certainly very doable, which puts us around 19,000 by December. I think 20,000 is a nice round number that somewhere, sometime between now and March, is a 60% probability. So, it is not a bad bet.
Q: From where we stand, if I ask you to split your portfolio between equity, fixed income and gold. How much would you give each?
A: Gold I will always give close to zero. It doesn’t make any sense, when the mother of all bull market is operating everywhere in the world, to have any weightage for gold whatsoever. You buy gold for Diwali and jewellery but certainly not as an investment. Fixed income, again for the same reason I have never been really a fan of fixed income. When the market has the probability of 50-50%, 50% going up and 50% going down, you should have some of your portfolio in fixed income. But not when the market has something like an 80% chance of going up. It has consistently done that for four years, this is the fifth year.
My advice to conservative investors is to be 100% in equities and within equities, you balance your portfolio with those that are relatively stable, those that are out of favour. So if you want to be conservative, you play it within the stock portfolio, not try and do that and try and do those. Either one of which, is liable to give you a few percentage points but not much more.
If you have to do it as a business because you are trader with a bank in fixed income, you can do it, but not as a retail investor. Retail investor should really be in equities. Within equities the retail investor as well other investors make their choices about how risky a portfolio to have.
|
|
Business
Business News | Economy | Earnings | BSE NSE Notices
General News
Current Affairs | Politics | World News | Sports | Entertainment
Corporate Strategy
Management | Advertising | Marketing | Legal
Personal Finance
Tax | Insurance | Credit Cards | Loans | Property | Retirement | Investment Help | Financial Planning | Fixed Income
Markets
Local Market | Global Market | Market Cues | Analysis | Expert & FII outlook | Brokerage Recomendation
Stocks
Stocks in News | Expert Advice | ADRs & GDRs | IPO
Mutual Funds
News | Advice | MF Analysis | Fund Managers Views
Lifestyle
Travel | Wellness | Technology | Auto| Books
-
Most Read
-
Most Viewed
- 10 Companies that FIIs love
- 10 companies that MF managers love
- Expert sector picks to power your portfolio ahead

- Will ITC dream run continue beyond FY10?

- Mitesh Thacker's top 5 picks for trade today

- Moody's maintains negative view on India's credit condition

- Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty marries Raj Kundra
- Den Networks closes 16% lower on first day
- Worst over for India auto companies: Anand Mahindra
- India indispensable to America's future: Barack Obama
- Mahindra may increase car prices due to rising input costs
Source: Business Line
- Renault to continue with M&M for Logan, says Ghosn
Source: Business Line
- Market volatility poses valuation problems: IRDA
Source: Business Line
- Punjab, Haryana buck all-India rice decline trend
Source: Business Line










