| | |
The market and the people have been expecting a lot from the Budget both in terms of policies and reforms. Vibhav Kapoor, Director, IL&FS thinks that the Budget is overhyped.
The Street has been expecting a lot from the Budget both in terms of policies and reforms. Vibhav Kapoor, Director, IL&FS thinks that the Budget is overhyped. "Fiscal policy is an important instrument and therefore it is important as to whether the fiscal deficit is brought down to 4.8 percent or 5 percent over a period of time. Beyond that, it is the growth which matters and the Budget is only one instrument which can do and that too just for one day" adds Kapoor.
With regards to the disinvestment that government made this year, Kapoor feels government may target Rs 40,000-50,000 crore through disinvestment in FY14.
Q: Do you think there is a 10 percent upside or downside potential from this Budget or does that remains squarely on global developments, not so much on this unique development?
A: Yes, I think in India the Budget is overhyped. Fiscal policy is definitely an important instrument, no doubt and that can have an impact on how the economy grows and we have seen that over the last three years. In 2009-10, there was a lot of stimulus given to the economy through higher fiscal deficits. The economy actually grew at 9.3 percent. So, there was no need for that much fiscal deficit which has resulted today in higher inflation and lower growth rates.
Fiscal policy is an important instrument and therefore it is important as to whether the fiscal deficit is brought down to 4.8 percent or 5 percent over a period of time. It can impact certain sectors, like excise duty going up on cigarettes. Beyond that, it is the growth which matters and the Budget is only one instrument which can do that and is only done on one day. The growth cycle depends on a lot of other things which includes other government initiatives throughout the year, the RBI monetary policy, global news. All those things ultimately impact the markets.
Q: The Finance Minister (FM) is likely to look at rolling over subsidies which is not a great news. What would you look at in the quality of this figure that he sets out both for the 5.3 percent target and then what he has to say for FY14?
A: If you look at the figures, in order to bring that down to 5.3 percent or 5.2 percent you would need to cut down expenditure by about Rs 110,000 crore. For the next year, again, you will need some cut in expenditure or raising of taxes to bring it down to 4.8 percent. Unfortunately, the non-development expenditure which is interest on borrowings which is the subsidies, is difficult to bring down.
The government has taken a positive step by partly decontrolling diesel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The move is going to help more in the next year rather than this year, because this year is almost gone. You cannot raise taxes at this late stage, so the axe is going to fall on development expenditure. Maybe out of Rs 110,000 crore, you can do about Rs 25,000 crore in non-development expenditure through cuts in defense, yet a substantial portion of it will have to fall under development expenditure.
Q: The path that interests the market the most is what FM has to say about his divestment target. He may raise it to Rs 40,000-50,000 crore as opposed to Rs 30,000 crore he did last year. How will the market react to that? How much paper is going to get hit and what kind of appetite will so much divestment get?
A: This year we have already raised Rs 22,000 crore and should raise another Rs 7,000-8,000 crore to reach closer to Rs 30,000 crore. Going to Rs 40,000 crore, I do not think it will cause extra supply of paper, but there are other alternatives. For example UTI, the government has investments in specified undertaking of UTI (SUUTI), three investments which are largely there which can easily raise Rs 40,000-45,000 crore, it is their market value and need not be done over a single day.
It can be done through gradual disinvestments over the full year and we have seen other governments like the US doing in many of the investments in 2008. For example, American International Group (AIG) where they have put in some USD 90 billion and have got out of it. So, I do not think that is really an issue. If it is done in a proper manner it is possible to do even more than Rs 40,000 crore.
Q: Do you think the names that are being discussed will see the same reactions like Oil India or National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC)? It is not the best of read - National Aluminium Company (NALCO), Steel Authority of India (SAIL) or at some point Coal India.
A: They are good companies. Some of them may go through bad patches because of their cycle right now. The real issue in all these disinvestments whether they are good companies or bad companies is the pricing and the proper discovery of pricing, leaving something on the table for investors. This year the FM has done a great job in successfully selling these issues because the pricing was right. If you leave enough on the table for investors, you can sell them.
Q: The highest sensitivity will be capital goods and infrastructure, because of how bad earnings season has been? What do you think that sector needs to hear to come out of the poor performance it had?
A: It is not entirely a Budget issue. It may partly be that investors are looking at how much capital expenditure is going to be there in the Budget, how much is going to go for various developmental projects and that has never been a problem. Last year also, we had lot of expenditure in the Budget. The real issues are outside the Budget and have been very well discussed.
There are issues of clearance of projects, there are issues about fuel linkages for the power sector, there are issues about environmental clearances, forest clearances for roads. So, it is more of administrative issues rather than financial issues or shortage of finance. I do not think there is any shortage of finance as far as the issue of financing this project is concerned, Budget has a limited role there.
ADS BY GOOGLE
video of the day
Barring IT & pharma, Q2 earnings to disappoint: Dimensions