Real-time Stock quotes, portfolio, LIVE TV and more.
Jul 17, 2012, 02.27 PM IST
Even though MASL has achieved an impressive growth on the revenue front in recent years, its operating margin (10%) is nothing to boast about.
Max Alert Systems : SEBI requires maximum alert to prevent 'market-makers' turning into manipulators!
The 2004-incorporated Max Alert Systems Ltd (MASL) proposes to offer public 40 lakh equity shares of Rs 10 each at a fixed price of Rs 20 a piece aggregating to Rs 8 crore of which 6 lakh shares are reserved for the market maker.
The shares are proposed to be listed on the SME Platform of Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). Minimum subscription for the retail applicant is 6000 shares or Rs 1.2 lakh. The entire issue has been under-written by the lead manager, Comfort Securities.
The object of the issue is setting up of a stone crushing plant at a cost of Rs 8.6 crore besides facilitating the listing of the shares. However, the fund requirement and deployment have not been appraised by any bank or financial institution.
The IPO being made under 'Chapter XB of the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations', there is no requirement of IPO grading.
The Mumbai-registered MASL has been promoted by Kerala-based Anilkumar Chandra (40) and his brother Lenin Chandran (38), who have diploma in Electronics Engineering. Currently they hold 99.5% of the pre-issue equity of Rs 5.20 crore which amounts to 56.5% post-IPO.
The promoters, who claim to have experience in fire fighting, buildings management systems (BMS), telecom and infrastructure activities for over 7 years, have 9 companies under their fold of which only three have a credible record to speak about. Being an ex-employee of BPL Telecom, Anilkumar initially concentrated on telecom tower related activities and subsequently diversified into fire protection. Recently the group has entered into stone crushing and road construction activities.
Interestingly, the group flagship, Delta Infra Ltd, which is a competitor to MASL in telecom tower erection and stone crushing, too has plans to go public sooner than later.
Initially engaged in providing solutions for fire fighting services, BMS and other allied activities, MASL subsequently diversified into the business of telecom industry i.e. installation of mobile towers. However, of late, telecom related activities have been pruned down.
As regards financial performance, MASL has registered an impressive growth in last four years. From just Rs 3.88 crore in 2007, the company’s revenue has progressively increased to over Rs 33 crore in 2011. Net profit has leapt from Rs 13 lakh to Rs 171 lakh during this period. Nevertheless, post-bonus issue, the eight year-old company’s reserves amount to less than Rs 2 crore.
Even though MASL has achieved an impressive growth on the revenue front in recent years, its operating margin (10%) is nothing to boast about. For the last audited full year, the company’s bottom line amounted to Rs 1.73 crore which yields an EPS of about Rs 1.90 on the post-IPO equity of Rs 9.2 crore. Will the premium issue fetch any dividend in the first year? If the company’s short term fund requirements (Rs 6.5 crore) to retire its loans are any indication, investors may have to wait for a while to get a decent return. In fact, what one should worry about is the company’s unwarranted diversification into stone crushing activity.
MASL’s group company Delta Infra Ltd is said to have recently entered into stone crushing in the state of Jharkhand. For Delta, which is into infra-construction activity, crushing could be a natural diversification. MASL’s proposal to set up a crusher in Jharkhand thus raises serious doubts about the promoters’ intention.
While there is no comparable peer in the market to gauge the pricing, MASL’s IPO price looks reasonable against its historical earnings though the unrelated diversifications and conflict of business interests within the group companies make the IPO unworthy for investment.
The lead manager of MASL IPO, Comfort Securities, has fully underwritten the issue which will make the IPO sail through. But, will the lead manager be able provide enough comfort to the investors as a market maker without any manipulation? The previous two IPOs handled by the same investment bankers are today languishing at less than one-fifth of their offer prices!
- Promoters new to investors; profitability far from impressive; non-dividend paying company
May 22 2013, 13:11
- in MARKET OUTLOOK
May 22 2013, 10:44
- in Economy