CRISIL: Why is it critical to revive the private sector?

Rising role of private sector in the 2000s
For India, the first decade of this century was a watershed in many respects. It started with a below-trend growth rate of 5.5% between 2000-01 and 2003-04, but later surprised on the upside when the economy expanded at a neverbefore-seen rate of nearly 9% per year between 2004-05 and 2007-08. Then the global financial crisis intervened and dragged down growth to 6.7% in 2008-09. But the economy recovered swiftly and forged ahead in the next two years with 8.4% growth.

As the next decade dawned, growth slipped again. GDP growth was at 6.5% in 2011-12 and the prospects are equally weak for 2012-13. The role of the private sector and the public sector in shaping investments and growth during the decade of 2000s is a study in contrast.

During 2004-05 to 2007-08, when India’s overall GDP was growing at an average rate of 8.8%, private sector GDP expanded by about 10% compared to 6% in the public sector. During this period, there was also a sharp surge in private investments, particularly from the private corporate sector. Private corporate sector investments grew to 17.3% of GDP in 2007-08 from 10.3% of GDP in 2004-05. This quantum jump in investments was significantly funded by increased savings/retained earnings of the corporate sector, which rose by 2.8% of GDP during the same period. Private corporate sector, thus, played an important role in lifting savings and investments in the economy and, thereby, growth.

The critical role played by the private sector during the boom years from 2004-05 to 2007-08 becomes even more evident when one takes a closer look at manufacturing growth. During this period, private sector manufacturing grew by a remarkable 12.4%, expanding India’s manufacturing sector by 10.5% despite a 0.1% contraction in public sector manufacturing. During 2004-05 to 2007-08, the burden of driving India’s manufacturing growth was borne almost entirely by the private sector, which contributed over 95% of manufacturing investments a significant rise from 73% in the 1980s. A similar trend was observed yet again in 2010-11, when the manufacturing sector expanded by 7.6% driven by a 10% growth in private sector manufacturing, despite a 12% contraction in the public sector.

What lies ahead?
We do not have the GDP data break-up for public and private sectors for 2011-12 but we do know that overall GDP growth fell to 6.5% in 2011-12 from 8.4% in 2010-11. By a reasonable guesstimate, therefore, public sector GDP would have grown at best around the same level as in 2010-11 (6.5%) and private sector growth would have fallen significantly to similar levels of 6.5% from 9.0% growth recorded in 2010-11. What does this mean for 2012-13? Given the tight fiscal position of the government, it means that the ability of the public sector to give impetus to growth by increasing spending is limited. Persistently high inflation implies that the monetary policy via interest rates cuts can play a limited role in revising growth. The depressed global outlook rules out any external stimulus to India’s growth rate.

Under these circumstances, a return to the pre-crisis growth rate of 9% looks like a distant dream. The economy still has the potential to grow at 7.0-7.5% (RBI, 2012), much above the current rate of GDP growth of 6.5%. An improvement in private sector sentiment and pick-up in private sector investment can lift private sector GDP and, hence, the overall GDP growth.

This is particularly important for revival of manufacturing activity where private sector plays a dominant role. Overall manufacturing growth collapsed to 2.5% in 2011-12 and was -0.3% in the fourth quarter of the fiscal. Since 90% of the GDP in manufacturing originates in the private sector, a sustainable revival of private sector manufacturing growth will be extremely critical for achieving the ambitious objectives of New Manufacturing Policy (NMP), which aims to raise the share of manufacturing in India’s GDP to 25% by 2025 from 16% currently.

Disclaimer: CRISIL Research, a division of CRISIL Limited (CRISIL), has taken due care and caution in preparing this Report based on the information obtained by CRISIL from sources which it considers reliable (Data). However, CRISIL does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the Data / Report and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of Data / Report. This Report is not a recommendation to invest / disinvest in any company covered in the Report. CRISIL especially states that it has no financial liability whatsoever to the subscribers / users / transmitters / distributors of this Report. CRISIL Research operates independently of, and does not have access to information obtained by CRISIL’s Ratings Division / CRISIL Risk and Infrastructure Solutions Limited (CRIS), which may, in their regular operations, obtain information of a confidential nature. The views expressed in this Report are that of CRISIL Research and not of CRISIL’s Ratings Division / CRIS. No part of this Report may be published / reproduced in any form without CRISIL’s prior written approval.

The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.