- 02:15 PM Mahindra Satyam plunges nearly 11%
- 02:09 PM CBI unearths additional fraud of Rs4739cr in Satya...
- 02:01 PM Sundaram BNP Paribas launches PSU fund
- 02:00 PM Expect upside in Mahindra Forgings: Rajen Shah
- 01:57 PM Prefer tyre stocks, says Rajen Shah
- 01:44 PM How to get the best from equity funds
- 01:32 PM Nifty extends gain on positive European cues; suga...
- 01:31 PM Infy to hire 20000 in FY11, says job scene improvi...
- 01:31 PM Above Rs 5115, Nifty can touch Rs 5150: Finquest S...
- 01:30 PM Below Rs 94, Mahindra Satyam can test Rs 85: Bhamb...


Reliance Natural Resources Limited (RNRL) submitted its reply to Reliance Industries’ (RIL) special leave petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, reported CNBC-TV18 in an exclusive. The petition says that the SLP filed by RIL deserves to be dismissed.
Here is a verbatim transcript of Nayantara Rai’s comments on CNBC-TV18. Also watch the accompanying video.
RNRL has replied to RIL’s SLP in the Supreme Court. It says that RIL’s SLP deserves to be dismissed. It says that RIL is seeking to fire its gun from the government’s shoulder when the government actually has a very small role to play in this private dispute. The government’s role is only limited to determine the valuation of its own share and has nothing to do between RIL and RNRL. That is a commercial agreement between two private parties.
RNRL has gone on to say that the government stands to lose no revenues from the agreement between RIL and RNRL, since it only wants the share of gas that belongs to RIL for which RIL has complete marketing freedom. RNRL has also said that the Bombay High Court has very correctly upheld the fact that the government approval is not required for the sale price, and therefore, this clause should be struck-off from the gas agreement that was unilaterally signed by Reliance Industries in January 2006.
More interestingly, RNRL has gone on to say that the gas utilisation policy does not apply to the present case, and in fact, the EGoM has left it up to the court to decide and that it is up to the company court to ensure compliance with the MoU between the two brothers.
|
|
Business
Business News | Economy | Earnings | BSE NSE Notices
General News
Current Affairs | Politics | World News | Sports | Entertainment
Corporate Strategy
Management | Advertising | Marketing | Legal
Personal Finance
Tax | Insurance | Credit Cards | Loans | Property | Retirement | Investment Help | Financial Planning | Fixed Income
Markets
Local Market | Global Market | Market Cues | Analysis | Expert & FII outlook | Brokerage Recomendation
Stocks
Stocks in News | Expert Advice | ADRs & GDRs | IPO
Mutual Funds
News | Advice | MF Analysis | Fund Managers Views
Lifestyle
Travel | Wellness | Technology | Auto| Books
-
Most Read
-
Most Viewed
- 10 Companies that FIIs love
- 10 companies that MF managers love
- Sudarshan Sukhani's top five picks for today's trade

- Expert sector picks to power your portfolio ahead

- Ganeshaspeaks: Market prediction for Nov 25
- Ex-bonus, RIL will see correction: SP Tulsian

- Mitesh Thacker's top 5 picks for trade today

- Mah Satyam looks at out-of-court settlement with creditors
- Mkts to remain strong; bet on midcaps: Ramesh Damani
- Will ITC dream run continue beyond FY10?

- Mahindra may increase car prices due to rising input costs
Source: Business Line
- Renault to continue with M&M for Logan, says Ghosn
Source: Business Line
- Market volatility poses valuation problems: IRDA
Source: Business Line
- Punjab, Haryana buck all-India rice decline trend
Source: Business Line











