Will come out clean from Tatra controversy: BEML

VRS Natarajan clarified that BEML has no role to play in this defense controversy and he is ready to explain the companyís position with respect to the contact whenever asked for.
  • Language
  • App
  • Subscriptions
  • Specials
  • Sign-In
  • Register
GeStepAhead Realasset
moneycontrol.com

Home » News » Business

Mar 30, 2012, 06.15 PM | Source: CNBC-TV18

Will come out clean from Tatra controversy: BEML

VRS Natarajan clarified that BEML has no role to play in this defense controversy and he is ready to explain the companyís position with respect to the contact whenever asked for.

Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3

Will come out clean from Tatra controversy: BEML

VRS Natarajan clarified that BEML has no role to play in this defense controversy and he is ready to explain the companyís position with respect to the contact whenever asked for.

Post Your Comments

Share Cancel

Bazaar

Excerpts from Bazaar on CNBC-TV18 Watch the full show ¬Ľ

The controversy on defense orders continues to brew. This has some collateral impact on defense public sector unit player BEML . The stock tanked 2.34% on Thursday. Its chairman VRS Natarajan has been summoned by defense standing committee to detail the Tatra truck contract.

Speaking to CNBC-TV18, Natarajan clarified that BEML has no role to play in this defense controversy and no finger of suspicion should be pointed at them. He said, he is ready to explain the companyís position with respect to the contact whenever asked for.

"All the 7,000 vehicles which have been supplied to the Ministry of Defense for the past 26 years are only on account of single enquiry without competitive bidding. Therefore, this controversy of collaborator influencing is made in out of context manner," he said.

Below is the edited transcript of the interview. Also watch the accompanying video.

Q: You have been asked to explain your case on the Tatra contract in front of the defense standing committee, are you sure you will be able to explain your position adequately to them?

A: Wherever we are called we are going to talk the fact that as far as this controversy is concerned BEML has no role whatsoever. BEML has been a single vendor supplier, no competition, no competitor can offer our versatile world class product. All the 7,000 vehicles which have been supplied to the Ministry of Defense for the past 26 years are only on account of single enquiry without competitive bidding.

Therefore, this controversy of the collaborator influencing is made in out of context manner because the intent is made based on the usage in the Directorate in the Indian Army and they have to be approved. Intents are made on BEML to supply. No amount of influencing can increase even one vehicle more than what they wanted. It is not a vehicle that we make and supply, it is made on order and is customised for only Indian defence, nobody else is supplied in Indian context. Therefore, this is unnecessary controversy raised involving BEML collaborator. I donít think there is any upfront truth in that.

Q: You are saying that it would not even have been possible for this decision to a have been influenced in any way the award of orders because you yourself are saying that it did not go through competitive bidding where it could work both ways, fingers could be pointed at you that since this was almost a unilateral handing of a contract it might have been open to some kind of influence?

A: Absolutely and that too we are not in a position to influence the number. It is user who decides whether it is for capital acquisition or for revenue procurement. They decide the number that they want during the next year, they provide budget and enquiries are given. Only after this we start procuring 40% of components from Tatra, 60% has been integrated already in the country including Euro III engine we are producing in our engine plant. We donít import vehicle and then supply with BEMLís names.

This is all discussed, out of context; it is Indian owned product, technology has been seized. Therefore there is no need for BEML going around marketing. More than that BEML right from its Chairman thatís me, my Director-Defense and all the team of retired defense officials, Brigadiers and Colonel are going around and following up the order. No single official connected with Tatra even comes for marketing for the last ten years against Chairman of this company. When they are not even coming for normal marketing of the product or follow-up of the orders then where is the question of they coming and influencing for the numbers.

BEML stock price

On May 25, 2016, BEML closed at Rs 818.20, up Rs 0.90, or 0.11 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 1609.00 and the 52-week low was Rs 808.00.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 16.07 per share as per the quarter ended December 2015. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 50.91. The latest book value of the company is Rs 498.66 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 1.64.

1 2

Ads by Google

Buy, Hold, Sell ? Hear it first on M3
Will come out clean from Tatra controversy: BEML

See all

Get started using your favorite social network

or

Login using moneycontrol ID

Username
Password

Need help logging in? Reset password.

Don´t have an account? Sign Up

Get started using your favorite social network

or

Simply sign up using this short form

* mandatory

UserName*

Username should be atleast 4 character

Password*

Password should be 8 or more characters,
atleast 1 number, 1 symbol & 1 upper case letter

Alert

Your Password should contain
  • 8 or more characters
  • At least 1 number
  • At least 1 symbol
  • At least 1 upper case letter
Confirm Password*
Email
Already have an account? Login