Refund is unconstitutional, says IGL chairman

Indraprastha Gas has not yet decided on pricing petroleum products it sells even after the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board directed Indraprastha Gas Ltd asked the company to cut tariffs.
  • Language
  • App
  • Subscriptions
  • Specials
  • Sign-In
  • Register
GeStepAhead Masteryourmoney Earnings
moneycontrol.com

Home » News » Business

Apr 11, 2012, 08.13 AM | Source: CNBC-TV18

Refund is unconstitutional, says IGL chairman

Indraprastha Gas has not yet decided on pricing petroleum products it sells even after the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board directed Indraprastha Gas Ltd asked the company to cut tariffs.

Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3

Refund is unconstitutional, says IGL chairman

Indraprastha Gas has not yet decided on pricing petroleum products it sells even after the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board directed Indraprastha Gas Ltd asked the company to cut tariffs.

Post Your Comments

Share Cancel

M Ravindran, CMD, IGL
Indraprastha Gas has not yet decided on pricing petroleum products it sells even after the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board ( PNGRB)directed Indraprastha Gas Ltd asked the company to cut tariffs.

M Ravindran, IGL’s chairman and managing director told CNBC-TV18 that PNGRB’s order is not pragmatic. “We will take a call on prices only after finalising legal action,” says Ravindran.

He further said that refund is against provisions of of PNGRB Act.

However, according to sources, IGL is contemplating to file a writ petition in the Delhi High Court against the natural gas regulator.

for more details.....

The regulator has also asked that its order be implemented immediately. The new tariff is effective retrospectively from 1 April 2008 and as per rough estimates, the excess tariff charged could be around Rs 1,600 crore.

Here is an edited transcript of Ravindran's  interivew to CNBC-TV18.

Q: Take us through your initial reaction on what has come through with regards to the PNGRB? How exactly is IGL going to react to this? What is the litigation? What are the legal steps you might undertake to counteract this?

A: The entire aspect of this PNGRB order is yet to be received physically by us as it has just been web posted. We will go through the entire aspect of the order in detail once we get it in black and white from our end. The only regulatory aspect which has come over here is that it is an order which has been passed from 2008 onwards which we feel is practically not possible right now at this point of time as we have given all our data to the regulator in 2008-2009 itself.

So passing an order in 2012 and by telling us to get a retrospective effect is not a practical thing and is not correct is what we feel at this point of time. However, we are going into the merit and legal aspect of the entire thing. We will be communicating to the entire team here by 4 pm which is what is it that we are going to take action for and then communicate how we will take it forward. The entire thing has to be seen in a legal and quasijudicial form.

Q: Is there a possibility that you might hike your marketing margins at least in the near-term to protect yourself a tad bit?

A: On the pricing front we have not finalised anything. The status quo position remains as it is. We will not take a call until we finalise on our legal course.

Q: How much do you think would be the excess charges according to you on retrospective basis?

A: For all these things, we will revert back to the entire team. We are communicating the entire message to the entire media team which is when you will be informed as well.

Q: You must have done a rough cut analysis – it has been close to 20 hours since the order got passed. What is your initial assessment of how much of a financial impact the order will have in its current form?

A: The order does not make any sense because there are various changes and assumptions which the regulator has assumed. There is no point in discussing these numbers because the assumptions vary which is not in confirmative with what we have assumed.

Q: In your assessment what should have been the scenario?

A: The scenario should have been that when we gave it in 2009 they should have finalised it within four-six months and then they should have impacted the tariffs immediately. But since they have taken three years at their own end to decide and then they say in June 2011 they have decided everything and are finally passing the order in April 2012 is something totally not acceptable to IGL.

Q: So there is no conformity on whether you will be hiking your marketing margins?

A: No. Nothing. We are keeping the pricing status quo as it is.

Also Read:

Indraprastha Gas to contest tariff cut directive in court

 

Ads by Google

Buy, Hold, Sell ? Hear it first on M3
Refund is unconstitutional, says IGL chairman

See all

Get started using your favorite social network

or

Login using moneycontrol ID

Username
Password

Need help logging in? Reset password.

Don´t have an account? Sign Up

Get started using your favorite social network

or

Simply sign up using this short form

* mandatory

UserName*

Username should be atleast 4 character

Password*

Password should be 8 or more characters,
atleast 1 number, 1 symbol & 1 upper case letter

Alert

Your Password should contain
  • 8 or more characters
  • At least 1 number
  • At least 1 symbol
  • At least 1 upper case letter
Confirm Password*
Email
Already have an account? Login