The retail sector, where the government permitted foreign direct investment in multi-brand, courted controversies during the year with several opposition parties making it a political issue in Parliament.
Adding action to the drama was Swedish furniture chain IKEA's hectic bargaining with the government over sourcing clauses for its foray into the Indian market with plans to invest Rs 10,500 crore, the largest FDI in single-brand retail so far, and the alleged Rs 870 crore fraud in Reebok India by its two top executives. The year started on a sombre note for the sector, with the lingering effect of the decision to put on hold relaxation of FDI in retail in 2011.
After battling stiff political opposition, the government allowed 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail in September this year, but left it to the states to permit global retailers to open stores. The government also gave its go ahead for 100 per cent FDI in single-brand retail from 51 per cent earlier. The sourcing norms for FDI exceeding 50 per cent in single brand retail was also tweaked, changing the previous "mandatory" sourcing requirement of 30 per cent of items from micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) to "preferably" from MSMEs.
It, however, required foreign firms that wanted relaxation of the 30 per cent procurement norms to set up manufacturing facilities in India. The step to let FDI in multi-brand retail didn't go down well with Opposition parties and erstwhile UPA ally Trinamool Congress, which decided to withdraw support from the government over the issue and others, including hike in diesel prices.
The issue stalled proceedings of Parliament till the government agreed to a voting on allowing of FDI in multi-brand retail that it managed to win, thanks to the abstention of Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samajwadi Party. Just when the government thought it was done with the issue, Wal-Mart's disclosure in the US that it spent close to USD 25 million (about Rs 125 crore) since 2008 on its various lobbying activities, including on issues related to "enhanced market access for investment in India", created furor again. The Opposition stalled Parliament for many days on the issue.
As per Wal-Mart's lobbying disclosure reports, the company has continuously lobbied for its India entry since 2008, except for a few quarters in 2009. The company, however, stressed that it did not pay bribes to anyone in India.
Another issue that created controversy was Wal-Mart's USD 100 million investment in Cedar Support Services, an arm of Bharti Ventures, when FDI in retail was not allowed. Now, the Enforcement Directorate is investigating the alleged violation of FDI regulations under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, by cash-and-carry chain Bharti Walmart -- the equal joint venture between Wal-Mart and Bharti group.
Not only Indian authorities, Wal-Mart itself is probing allegations of corrupt practices against it in foreign markets, including India. In March this year, the firm started a worldwide review of its policies, practices and internal controls for US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance.
Following this, Bharti Walmart suspended five people, including Chief Financial Officer Pankaj Madan, as part of the global investigation. After this, the JV decided to put a halt on opening of new cash and carry wholesale stores in India pending the probe.
While Wal-Mart hit the headlines in multi-brand, it was IKEA that made news continuously in the single-brand segment. The Swedish furniture announced plans to invest Rs 10,500 crore in India to open 25 stores over a period of time. It had proposed to invest 600 million euro (Rs 4,200 crore) to open 10 stores in the first stage. The remaining 900 million euro (Rs 6,300 crore) for opening 15 more stores.
READ MORE ON retail sector, foreign direct investment, Wal-Mart, multi-brandretail, lobbying, IKEA, Bharti Ventures
ADS BY GOOGLE
video of the day
Dont see mkt going anywhere now; like Bharat Forge: Dipen