Read
Listen
Watch
Play
Find
Mail
  • Quotes

  • NAVs

  • News

  • Messages

  • Opinions

  • Notices

  • Videos

Post trust vote: Experts take on road ahead for UPA

Published on Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 18:18 , Updated at Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 19:20
Source : CNBC-TV18

Email    Print    Watch Video

ads by google

The confidence vote is over but confidence of the Indian people in their politicians seems to be have been badly shattered. The government won but that is the least of today’s outcome. The bigger questions are, where does Indian democracy now stand? What does this mean for its principal players?

 

Shobhana Bhartia, Editorial Director, Hindustan Times, doesn’t foresee any issues going forward in terms of security and longevity of the government. “We are talking of 8-9 months in any case. That tenure seems to be quite comfortable, but with what moral legitimacy can they actually govern and rule.”

 

Gautam Adhikari, Editorial Advisor, Times of India, said the road ahead for the government is not going to be easy. “Collation politics are fairly complex. However, it’s going to be easier than working with the Left which hardly allowed any reforms to proceed.”

 

Chandan Mitra, Editor, Pioneer, said the government has  won the vote but has lost the people’s trust.

 

N Ram, Editor-in-Chief, The Hindu, said the allegations have taken a lot of shine off the victory because there was a strong indication that some dealings were quite rotten.

 

Excerpts from the CNBC-TV18’s panel discussion:

 

Q: How much credibility has the government actually won through the vote of confidence?

 

Bhartia: It was a very sad day for Indian democracy. The sight we saw made all of us feel really small.

 

In terms of the credibility of the vote, I guess the charges are not proved. So, it’s very difficult to level any sort of allegations whether or not the money actually changed hands or whether certain MPs could have entered the house with that amount. I hope there is a proper independent enquiry into this. We have no option but to except the vote for what it was, i.e. the government has won a resounding victory in the current situation.

 

Q: Journalists go by instinct, hunches, and have a nose where the truth lies. As one of the country’s senior editors, how much credibility do you attach to the allegations of corruption leveled by both the Left and the Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP, against the Congress and Samajwadi Party?

 

Ram: It has certainly taken a good bit of shine off this victory. I expected the UPA plus combination to win. This was pretty much what people really expected, but it has taken a lot of the shine off the victory because there was a strong indication. We knew it was happening and here is a concrete indication that some of the dealings were quite rotten. My concern now is not so much what’s in the past but whether they will be properly investigated. In the past, when the ruling party, regardless of who is in power, is the dock, the investigation tends to be non-independent. However, the ruling party has a chance. This is an opportunity for the UPA government to demonstrate that it will not cover up, because there is every reason to cover up. However, the whole nation would be watching.

 

Q: The circumstances in which the vote took place were far from ideal. Should the vote have been postponed perhaps by a day, so that it could have happened in a more conducive atmosphere?

 

Adhikari: The atmosphere was very conducive for the vote. There was no problem. Yes, there was a whole lot of cash being poured out of sacks out there in the middle of Parliament, which is very unusual. I wonder how they got all that cash in through security.

 

But there is a charge that is being leveled. The Speaker’s Office has got the evidence and is looking into it. So, the trust vote is out and the government has survived. I think the nuclear deal has also survived.

 

Q: Has the trust vote experience actually galvanized support for the NDA, perhaps LK Advani in particular, as the government won with a majority of 19 votes? But does it actually have the majority of MPs in Parliament because somewhere between 4-7 BJP MP’s have actually voted for the government, and may be one or two abstained? Does that surprise you?

 

Mitra: This is very unfortunate. It is very sad. But if this happens I do not know the exact number. I think most channels are talking about four cross votes and two abstentions. What we saw on the floor of the house proves the manner in which the ruling combine was going all out with suitcases and promises and trying to allure MPs away. First MPs were afraid of losing their seats, then they were being lured with this kind of money.

 

Q: But between four or may be seven BJP MPs actually got bought?

 

Mitra: Two people were unwell, so the cross vote is four.

 

Q: A rival channel is saying seven?

 

Mitra: Possible. We will know only tomorrow when the exact number comes out. It is a very sad thing. At the end of the day, the government has no doubt won the vote very handsomely. It’s won the vote alright but it has lost the trust of the people of India.

 

Q: The government has won with a majority. In actual number terms, it has the majority of the total members of the Lok Sabha behind it. How secure is the UPA government here after?

 

Bhartia: I think the government is quite secure in terms of numbers, but it definitely has taken the sheen off this victory. So, the moral legitimacy of the government, especially of the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh who is sort of known for his integrity, does stand a little dented. But in terms of security and longevity of the government, I don’t personally foresee any issues going forward because we are talking of 8-9 months in any case. No confidence motion can come up definitely, but one doesn’t foresee that happening in the near future. So, that tenure seems to be quite comfortable but with what moral legitimacy can they actually govern and rule.

 

Q: One could say that the Left has failed both in terms of its determination to prevent the nuclear deal happening and whatever influence it had over the UPA to influence the government’s policies and actions. Would you say this is a double whammy against the Left?

 

Ram: I don’t think the choice that the Left made was consciously done. It could have easily hung on, but it took a clear stand. I wouldn’t say that the deal is through yet. The chances of the deal getting through have certainly improved quite considerably but it depends on how whether the safeguard agreement goes through. Will further changes be insisted upon is the big question? More importantly, whether the Nuclear Suppliers Group, or NSG, are going to except the framework of the 123 Agreement.

 

Q: None of those are steps where the Left can actually adversely influence the deal?

 

Ram: Yes, that’s true I am saying the deal is not necessarily through because there has been a delay and in nay case the question is that if you consciously opt for something, than what more can you say. You opted for a certain course, so you don’t blame anyone for that you take responsibility and I think the Left would say that.

 

Q: How irreversible is the difference in the division between the Left and the Congress? Can they still be able to come together on the other side of an election?

 

Adhikari: For that, a major change might have to happen in the Left. Much of this was driven forward by ideological positions adopted by the General Secretary of the Communist Party of India-Marxist, Prakash Karat. There have already been questions raised by party people in West Bengal on whether all this was worth the ideological zeal of pushing it through towards a no trust or to making the government fall, or to get close to the BJP. All these were questions that people within the CPM were raising. This could impact Karat’s position and power.

 

Q: But do you think that it is a more credible thing?

 

Adhikari: No, not at the moment, but it might happen later on. If something like that happens, certainly the Left can be far more accommodative.

 

Q: The relationship between the Left and the Congress is one aspect that is intriguing tonight, the other is the relationship between the BJP and Mayawati. Now, they were allies on the same side, this might provide grounds for them to become allies and forge firmer long lasting alliance in that sense?

 

Mitra: In fact, Mayawati launched a diatribe on the BJP blaming the party entirely for losing the trust vote and saying that BJP didn’t want to see her as Prime Minister, which is why they deliberately loss the vote. The BJP did try its best, but failed in seconds. After these kind of statements, it certainly doesn’t augur well for the BJP and Bahujan Samaj Party, or BSP, tie up. The BJP has been beaten not once or twice but thrice. I don’t think they will even entertain the thought.

 

I think Prakash Karat’s gambit to emerge as a leader of a third force in which Mayawati, Chandrababu Naidu’s Telugu Desam Party, and other regional parties that would like to open together is a factor. He hopes that post the next elections, the Left will regain the kind of influence and power it had on Manmohan Singh’s government through some other route.

 

Q: LK Advani used to like to call him the weakest prime minister ever - is that now disproved?

Bhartia: That’s completely disproved and I don’t think that was even the fact earlier. But by this last action of his where he felt strongly about the deal, he had the conviction to go after it, the strategic perspective to try and follow an alternative path and look for a new political alliance which is stitched together and which will perhaps allow the new Manmohan Singh to emerge. So not only he has got rid of the Left and got the Samajwadi Party to support him, but by this one move he will be able to go forward on all that he actually stood for and none of this actually points towards a weak or a politically naïve prime minister. So we are going to be very difficult for his critics also to call him a weak or apolitical prime minister especially after the last move of his.

Q: So Shobhana is very positive in her opinion, was this example of strong leadership, or would you call it a reckless gamble by a prime minister of a government you have often characterized as a one trick pony?

Ram: He has won on this one so he is obviously not weak and the party has been resourceful with its allies so it’s not the issue now but the issue is whether what their prospects are going to be in the Fifteenth General Elections and whether this helps in any way but have these alignments helped, that’s the sort of things we should be looking at and not so much the individuals here.

Q: So what’s your answer to your question, will this help or wont this?

Ram: I don’t think it is going to help very much, the things are very murky and it’s not going to make a huge difference. I would say that keeping the slots together particular the Samajwadi Party, so its going to be a big ask and you would even say its an unenviable challenge for the Congress party and in particular the prime minister who is on the clean image at least in terms of personal probity.

Q: How difficult a challenge would it be to actually ensure that he can work effectively with the Samajwadi Party and perhaps one should say with the commercial demands and quotations that Mr. Amar Singh might keep coming up with and there is also the Shibu Soren, how difficult is the task the two together?

Adhikari: Of course, it’s not going to be easy, collation politics are always fairly complex but surely it’s going to be easier than working with the Left which hardly allowed any reforms to proceed, it was putting its stamp on foreign policy and not letting a foreign policy initiative progress, how much more difficult can it get nothing could be done for the couple of years. So maybe it’s possible that with this victory and the credibility that the government and the prime minister have acquired, it will be possible to push a reform program through.

Q: Would you accept that easier than the Left, is this an opportunity for the prime minister to push through raising insurance caps and banking and reforms?

Mitra: I find myself in an odd position of actually giving a certificate to the Left, they were far better people and they had ideological issues and they didn’t have private agendas.

Q: So you mean goodness of character?

Mitra: No, its not goodness of character, they were united and not a single person abstained or cross voted and they had ideological issues and once the Congress entered into a common minimum program, the Left knew what was coming and the deal was not in the picture. That was the problem precisely the problem, the ideological issues. Our ideological issues would be preferable to personal/corporate agendas.

Q: Which is what you are saying that Amar Singh is going to bring fatigue?

Mitra: I don’t say this but almost everybody is saying this.

Q: So you won’t descent?

Mitra: No I won’t, and it’s very clear and Shibu Soren, its all clear.

Q: Let’s move on to Mayawati, until this evening, everyone had assumed that she was going to be the big winner of this political process, but do you think tonight its still the case?

Bhartia: I didn’t believe that to start with because the moment you assume that Mayawati is going to be like a king maker and it is going to be catapulted in centre stage in the sense of being projected as a possible prime ministerial candidate, so what happens to LK Advani’s ambitions then? The fact that she expected to be the prime Minster of the so-called third force obviously assumed that the BJP would be willing to back her. So to me that seems like a non-starter from the word go and after the altercations between her and all that she said about he BJP after the trust vote, I see her chances of actually staying in that position for very long being extremely dim. She has leveled charges against them; she has blamed them for the UPA getting the majority vote.

Q: Taking up the point that Shobhana was making, has LK Advani been eclipsed by Mayawati he was meant to be the prime minister and she suddenly looked that she was, but tonight has he suddenly been eclipsed?

Mitra: If there were ever a television driven political hype, this was it. Over the last 48 hours there has been this huge hype on television and channel after channel that Mayawati has eclipsed LK Advani and Mayawati is the flavour of the month, she is the rising star and the future prime minister, alternative government, LK Advani is gone but where was the substance.

Mayawati is yet to win seats outside the UP. Her allies Chandrababu Naidu and Chandra Sekhar Rao are in deep trouble in their own states and what are people talking about even in the Left has said that their assumption of Mayawati was limited to this vote.

Q: If the press had played up Mayawati, have they done the opposite to Prakash Karat, the feeling at least on the television channels that Karat is the big looser of this political process that ended this evening, would you accept that?

Ram: This is not a personal agenda, I know very well that Prakash Karat was representing the overwhelming position and sentiment from the Left. I know its not Prakash Karat versus somebody else and there may have been people who didn’t want early elections but now that’s ensured so why would the West Bengal usage be unhappy if its on the opposite side of the Congress and there are no early elections, so Prakash Karat represents a very strong trend on the Left and not just on the CPI but across the board and people who are with their post on the nuclear deal and as you said once “ even more the context than the text” and that is the position of the Left - so how is it a personal agenda?

Q: If the context is what the Left is really strong on, rather than the text, was AB Vardhan and beyond him the Left parties as a whole correct to endorse some one like Mayawati as a potential prime ministerial candidate given that she faces serious charges of corruption and personal money making, have they damaged their own undoubted integrity by in a sense lining up behind her?

Adhikari: I am in full agreement with Chandan on this issue. There was so much idiotic hype in the media bout Mayawati in the last couple of days, it was unbelievable, both her influences out side the belt that she has undoubted some influence over is not clear at all and she was being projected as the prime minister, but prime minister of what? Quoted by whom, the BJP and the Left together, no body seemed to be asking those questions.

Q: What about my question about Vardhan and the Left?

Adhikari: I don’t want to comment on people like Vardhan, the CPI is a serious party but the CPM is hardly there and Vardhan became.

I would defiantly therefore say that Prakash Karat made a mistake in my view in calling on her and giving her this kind of a leg up and then everybody went after her and the cameras went after Prakash Karat and started filming this person.

Q: Who made a bigger mistake in building up Mayawati, the press or Prakash Karat?

Bhartia: It was Prakash Karat and not the press as the press was simply reporting the events as they unfold and the fact is that where as we may say that she doesn’t have any great influence outside of UP, but in the past we have seen prime ministers who hardly had any influence at all, so I don’t think its something that could be easily done but for the fact that the BJP never seems keen at all on supporting her, but there was every attempt within a certain set of parties to try and project Mayawati as an alternative and the press was just capturing what was happening at the ground level to try and do what ever they could to ensure that the UPA gets acquainted and the BJP was trying to be one over on the same side as well.

Q: You heard Gautam Adhikari mention the possibility that Prakash Karat may find his continuation as the general secretary of the CPM, do you endorse that or it’s again the press getting it wrong?

Ram: I would laugh at that because it’s wishful thinking on the part of my friend Gautam, and whoever else doesn’t like this politics, wishful thinking because as I said and I re-iterate this now and this represents the overwhelming sentiment from the Left.

 

Messages on Politics

Post a comment

Other comments

Catholics, Karnataka and BJP

Well MS... There is a sad fact i know happened... A boy of about 14 years has been converted... His parents remain ...

in Politics - Callahan at 06-Oct-08 10:55

Catholics, Karnataka and BJP

pss5588 yes, there are downtrodden sector in muslim society also, but christian missionaries dare not show thei...

in Politics - arg_s at 06-Oct-08 10:43

More on Messageboard »

Rate this article

Sensex/Nifty