Policy to help invst abroad at raw mat source: Coromandel
Published on Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:13 , Updated at Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 22:15
Source : CNBC-TV18
| ads by google |
He said, "The policy will help us to invest abroad at raw material source. 20% of price will becovered in MRP and 80% will come from subsidy." Excerpts from CNBC-TV18’s exclusive interview with Vellayan:
Q: How it could it benefit a player like you; the changes which have come in with the potash and phosphatics side, particularly the new regulations for imports that have come in yesterday? A: Overall this new policy on phosphatics is welcomed. This is because of the following reasons - it is market related, it’s linked to international Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP). Also, it’s long-term and realistic. Moreover, it’s farmer-friendly in terms of nutrient and it does give a better possibility for long-term investments overseas in raw material areas. So, overall although the policy has been delayed for about three months, we have gone through all the features in the policy and it’s very positive. Q: Could you explain or illustrate with some examples how it could benefit a company like you particularly on the imported price front and how you can access some of these imports at prices that are more competitive to enable it to ripe higher profits? A: There are two aspects. First, in terms of availability; because of the bio-fuel boom world over, availability is a great problem and since the policy is linked to international DAP it affords the Indian manufacturer, the ability to buy at market related prices. Second feature is the 65:35 ratio, where there is an incentive for the domestic manufacture to source cheaper and the benefit of that 65% is left with the manufacturer and the government mopes 35% up. Both these are welcomed features. Q: How many fertiliser companies have the ability to source cheaper inputs like that and whether this indeed was the change in prices that you were asking for? A: 60% of the industry in phosphatics should be able to take advantage of this. There is a section of the phosphatics industry that is not well off financially, and they still have cash flow problems. But those companies that are liquid and those which have engaged in long-term tie-ups should benefit from this policy. Q: Are you expecting over the next few weeks to hear some more details on the policy because we didn't hear anything about how this subsidies going to be disbursed. We heard nothing about expansion and of course we probably won't hear anything about the retail price being tweaked? A: There are two-three areas that are still grey; the extent of cash as oppose to bonds that we expect to receive. This is extremely important because unless we have cash we cannot pay the suppliers and that will hurt availability. Then we had made a strong plea for banning of sulphuric and phosphoric acid exports. At a time when there is a world shortage of these products countries like China, it clearly made it impossible any raw materials to be exported. That again is not been spelt out clearly. In terms of the price it's fairly clear, only problem is 20% is only covered in the MRP, 80% will come from the subsidy. Q: Did you hear anything in the policy that encourages more brownfield expansions or any kind of expansions in the fertiliser sector; for a sector, which is woefully, short and bridging the demand supply gap? A: The redeeming factor of this policy was - it is a five-year policy. So we do not expect changes every year - that itself is conducive for long-term investment. Also, it is linked to international price of DAP and the 65:35 formula will encourage companies like ours to invest abroad at the source of raw material to create capacity and bring in that raw material to make the final product in India. Q: You are not engaged heavily into urea but that part is not been addressed at all. Would urea manufacturers be a bit unhappy? A: The policy on urea is awaited here again although we are not engaged in urea. I strongly urge the government to look at the debottlenecking so that we reduce our dependence some imports and make use of the capacity available within the country. |
Messages on Business Talk
Other comments
IIP at Aug at 1.3 agaist 10.9% (YOY)
dineshsahay-Situation out of hand!!We could be in the worst"Bear Phase"!!Everything except RIL falling down like ni...
in Business Talk - chief_kamani at 10-Oct-08 11:44
Liquidity adequate, global exposure small: ICICI Bk
Yup ! I guess yr point is valid ... public sector banks are SAFER on that count !!...
in Business Talk - DUstocks at 10-Oct-08 07:38
Rate this article
News
No News on Coromandel Fert
Notices
27-08 Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd has info...
12-08 Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd has info...
Expert Advice
No Expert Advice on Coromandel Fert
Management Interviews
18-07 Expect 15% growth this year: Coroma...
18-04 Sector awaits subsidy policy on pho...
Brokerage Reports
08-09 Coromandel Fertilisers an outperfor...
29-08 Chemical Update: Emkay Global Finan...
Technical Calls
No Technical Calls on Coromandel Fert
Chat
Ambareesh Baliga
, Karvy Stock Broking
(13 Oct- 16:00hrs)
What's the outlook for the market?
Poll
Newsletter
Keep in touch with News day & night. Subscribe to:
Mobile Services
Get news on the move SMS to 52622
- SMS M for Market News
- SMS B for Latest Business News
- SMS S (stock name) for latest news




Offline





