Read
Listen
Watch
Play
Find
Mail
  • Quotes

  • NAVs

  • News

  • Messages

  • Opinions

  • Notices

  • Videos

Plan to pull down inflation to 5.5% over the yr: YV Reddy

Published on Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 15:00 , Updated at Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:27
Source : CNBC-TV18

Email    Print    Watch Video

ads by google

In its Credit Policy, the RBI has hiked the CRR by 25 bps to 8.25%. It has left the repo, reverse repo rates unchanged.

The response of markets to policy changes have been divergent, the RBI Governor, YV Reddy said. The global growth is slowing down significantly, he said, adding that the inflation is a concern. He sees a conflict between price stability and financial stability. The global slowdown may not lower aggregate food demand, he added. The pass-through of high fuel prices is still incomplete, he said, speaking to the news media. He expects to bring down inflation to 5.5% over the year.

 

Excerpts from the press conference:

 

"What we tried to do last time on January 29, I took lot of your time to explain the reasons for the thoughtful in action because we just didn’t act.

 

When we explained, I explained two things that there is a continuing inflationary pressure and that there are lot of uncertainties and when there are so many global uncertainties, it is not appropriate to take a particular position and get yourself locked in that position and therefore it's better to watch and see what happens.

 

So we watched and we did take action during the interim as required considering the liquidity conditions. The question is what is the situation now?

 

The situation now is that there is greater inflationary pressure than what we expected. As far as growth is concerned, moderation is more or less on expected lines, global uncertainties have however increased and infact there is a constellation of adverse factors. We knew that there was global liquidity, we knew that the financial markets were in trouble, we knew that there was problem in fuel, we knew that there are problems related to food, but all of them have happened at the same time and all these factors happening together have resulted in an extraordinary degree of uncertainty.

 

Also global growth is definitely slowing down and it is significant. The global inflationary pressures have intensified and more importantly, the policies are responding to the immediate problems of financial markets in advanced countries and some of these measures taken in the interest of financial stability at the shorter end, may exactly operate against their important mandate of price stability.

 

In a way you have a conflict between price stability and financial stability. Although the policy proceeded in the assumption that is usually within inflation and growth and we have maintained price stability and financial stability is supposed to the sub-zoomed in the overall stability. But for the first time, almost globally there is a very clear dilemma or a conflict between choosing the short-term financial stability and the medium-term inflation. The sub-zoomed issue again is when there is a growth slowdown in the major economy. So these are unprecedented dilemmas for policy. Further when the policy measures have been taken, the response of the markets has not been as anticipated, there was a bit of a diversion between the policy objectives and to some extent policy outcome compared to what it was expected.

 

So we have this extraordinary global situation and domestically everything is going on track, financial stability is maintained, financial markets are alright, financial institutions are doing reasonably well. The only pressure point relates to inflation. Therefore naturally our major focus now in terms of the policy is inflation and therefore that gets the highest priority in terms of the policy.

 

If I quickly see the change between January stance and this stance, in January the stance was to reinforce the emphasis on price stability. Now we have made it very clear that it accords high priority to price stability.  Then we also said well anchored inflationary expectation. Why are we saying these two different things? Either way is because the price stability is depending on the way the price was moved whereas inflation expectations are partly on the action that we take.

 

So sometimes you have to demonstrate your determination to act on inflation to convince people and for that your expectations should be reasonable. So in a way these are two interrelated and this comes to the important focus at critical junctures of policy as we have now.

 

Second aspect is somewhat common that we have to respond swiftly to the ongoing developments. In terms of the type of dilemma we face for taking decisions at a global level, it is agreed that there is a global slowdown. If there is a global slowdown what will be the impact on the commodity markets, that really matters.

 

Food and fuel maybe slightly not entirely linked, because if you look at food, a large demand for food is coming from India and China and that demand is likely to be inelastic because both the economies are growing. So if both the economies are going, there are lot of people to eat more and their food habits are going to be also more intensive in terms of proteins etc."

 

Q: According to the statistics on inflation, commercial comparative statistics issued by the economists this month, most of the developed countries or affluent countries are having inflation rate of less than 4% while we think that for our people where most of them are poor 5% and 5.5% is an acceptable inflationary rate, how do you explain this?

 

A: What is realistic is different from what is acceptable. So in our policy also, we have very clearly indicated that if we want successful, optimal global integration, we should go towards inflation of 3%. I think as a goal that is stated in the policy itself, but to reach 3% so many other things had to happen and that is what we are trying. The second aspect, in comparing the inflation of advanced economies, which are emerging market economies one has to look at the importance of food. When food prices increase, the weight of food items in the inflation index of advanced economies is small. It is in our country that the weight of food article is very high. So for the same increase in food prices, we will find an index number going large.

 

So, my own feeling would be that there would be some inelastic demand on the food side and global slowdown may not impact the aggregate food demand. In fact, a lot more action may be required from the supply side.

In our country fortunately, the indications so far are quite optimistic on that point of view. So, our dependency in a way is marginal in terms of food in that sense though that is critical. As far as fuel price is concerned, I think fuel price is somewhat difficult in terms of demand and supply. But it is reasonable to proceed on the assumption purely for policy purposes that it may continue around the current level. It could go up or down, there could be a reduction in demand. But prudence requires that to proceed with the fuel price globally it will be the same.

 

If it is the same, as far as we are concerned, the pass through is still incomplete. So, whether the pass through will occur in the next few months or not is another issue. There our own assumption is, given the circumstances and the overall situation, it may not be possible to immediately pass through for two reasons. Globally, there is a possibility as I mentioned. If there is a slowdown, there could be a deceleration. In any case, public policy considerations may require that some of this may be absorbed rather than passed on. This is the assumption. If we make these assumptions, then we do come to a situation where it should be possible for our inflation to be brought down from 7% over the year to closer to 5.5%. That is our objective with regard to inflation.

 

With regard to growth however, our own assessment is that normal monsoon should be over 3% in agriculture and if services grow at 10%, then manufacturing growing at about 8% plus should be comfortable to take us to range of 8-8.5%.

 

Overall, we feel that we can comfortably continue the growth momentum in the range of 8-8.5%. As I explained, this is in terms of the cyclical situation, but inherently our savings and investments are fairly high. Our productivity is fairly high. The demand is effectively domestically demand driven.

Messages on Economy

Post a comment

Other comments

CRR cut by 50 bps; Bankers don't see cheap loans soon

The Reserve Bank of India, or RBI, has cut the cash reserve ratio, or CRR, by 50 bps to 8.5% with effect October 11...

in Economy - MMB Messenger at 06-Oct-08 10:39

RBI cuts cash reserve ratio by 50 bps

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Monday said it was cutting the cash reserve ratio (CRR) for banks by half a perc...

in Economy - TrueCompanion at 06-Oct-08 08:16

More on Messageboard »

Rate this article

Feedback

CNBC TV18 CNN IBN CNBC Awaaz IBN 7 IBN LOKMAT