| Post a Message | Explore Forums | Browse Stock Messages | Hot Discussions | Top rated Messages | Top Boarders | |
|
|
|
Market Outlook - Long Term
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
The primary difference lies in the obligation placed on contract holders and writers. In a futures contract, the holder is obliged to buy (or sell) the underlying asset at a specific price at a specific future date. On the other hand, an option gives the holder the right but not the obligation to buy (or sell) the underlying asset at a specific price at anytime before the expiration date. Hence the term option and this option comes at a price in the form of a premium (specifically the time value of the premium).
As a result, while both buyers and sellers of futures contracts face the same amount of risk, sellers of options take on an additional volatility risk in exchange for a premium and this premium can be high if the underlying asset is perceived to be very volatile.
...
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
It's best to invest ourselves instead of going with SIP, yes if your horizon is 20 / 30 years then you can do that....
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
sp.palo
Some investors opt for SIPs thinking that despite the drawbacks it is nonetheless a smart way to invest as opposed to one-time lumpsum investments. This is right, but SIPs work best only if you last the entire tenure and don’t redeem units prematurely. Some investment consultants advise their clients to go in for SIPs because the entry load is waived off. Their argument is that since the entry load is waived off, then even if the client withdraws prematurely, the 2.00% exit load (approximately) is not really damaging as its just a charge for not paying the entry load. This argument is flawed because the entry and exit loads are charged on different amounts.
For example, from the above real life illustration its easy to understand how the exit load can be particularly high on premature redemptions from an SIP. Take the first SIP at an NAV of Rs 11.72 (in the table above); if the investor had entered one-time at that level at 2.00% entry load it would have cost him Rs 0.23 (2% of Rs 11.72). But since he has opted for the SIP route let us understand how a premature redemption works for him. Say, the investor wants to redeem his units by January 1, 2005 because the NAV has climbed significantly and he wants to capitalise on the opportunity. He will be slapped with a 2.00% exit load since the entry load was waived off on the SIP. However, the 2.00% exit load will be calculated on Rs 18.68, which amounts to Rs 0.37. Compare this with the Rs 0.23 he would have had to pay if he had entered lumpsum in August 2004.
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Dear Sp.palo,
In case if one invest in SIP for 3 years horizon , I think the NAV will not be rising much in the case of 18 months rise and 18 months fall,or may be little rise in NAV.
I don't prefer the SIP, I prefer putting MF's whatever the amount you nare comfortable with, If you feel the vaue come down you can average as you would do for stocks.
You are right....
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
sp.palo
I may not be correct in my view .
But.. Suppose we invest in SIP for 3 years. Say the first 18 months markets rise 25% and the next 18 months the markets fall 30%, then what about the invested money. Someone may say that 4-5 years should be the horizon. Where is the end ?
My point is neither there is guarantee about the returns after a specific period nor we can specify a time frame as a safe horizon.So,book profits or redeem your funds after a predefined gain. Thats it. Greed has no end.
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Indian economy is expected to slow down to 7.6 percent during 2008 from 9.7 percent in the previous year in line with the global downturn triggered by soaring commodity prices and worldwide restrictive monetary policies, an UNCTAD report said on Thursday.
...
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Bearish strategy: ( very bearish One )
If you expect a downside and don't want to invest money from your pocket ( but be ready for some margin money get blocked )
SELL 1 ITM PUT, BUY 2 OTM PUTs.
example : NIFTY 4500
SELL 1* 4700 PE , and BUY 2 * 4400 PE, The money received from selling 4700 PE should supply the BUY puts.
profit and Risk:
If NIFTY closes at 4400, Two buy Puts are worthless, for the naked 4700 PE you should pay the difference between the strike price and market price.
IF nifty Closes at 4700 No loss, No gain.
IF nifty goes much below than 4200 then you might be making some money.
NOTE: The strategy presented above are compiled by me from the books and internet sources, using this will be at your own decision....
Regards
Aru...
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Sorry for not including the table in my above message. This is the table for the SIP example
Cheque Date NAV (Rs) SIP amount (Rs) No. of units
1-Aug-04 11.72 1,000 85.3
1-Sep-04 12.53 1,000 79.8
1-Oct-04 14.03 1,000 71.3
1-Nov-04 14.12 1,000 70.8
1-Dec-04 15.84 1,000 63.1
1-Jan-05 18.68 1,000 53.5
Average NAV 14.48 ...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
sp.palo
Some investors opt for SIPs thinking that despite the drawbacks it is nonetheless a smart way to invest as opposed to one-time lumpsum investments. This is right, but SIPs work best only if you last the entire tenure and don’t redeem units prematurely. Some investment consultants advise their clients to go in for SIPs because the entry load is waived off. Their argument is that since the entry load is waived off, then even if the client withdraws prematurely, the 2.00% exit load (approximately) is not really damaging as its just a charge for not paying the entry load. This argument is flawed because the entry and exit loads are charged on different amounts.
For example, from the above real life illustration its easy to understand how the exit load can be particularly high on premature redemptions from an SIP. Take the first SIP at an NAV of Rs 11.72 (in the table above); if the investor had entered one-time at that level at 2.00% entry load it would have cost him Rs 0.23 (2% of Rs 11.72). But since he has opted for the SIP route let us understand how a premature redemption works for him. Say, the investor wants to redeem his units by January 1, 2005 because the NAV has climbed significantly and he wants to capitalise on the opportunity. He will be slapped with a 2.00% exit load since the entry load was waived off on the SIP. However, the 2.00% exit load will be calculated on Rs 18.68, which amounts to Rs 0.37. Compare this with the Rs 0.23 he would have had to pay if he had entered lumpsum in August 2004.
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Some investors opt for SIPs thinking that despite the drawbacks it is nonetheless a smart way to invest as opposed to one-time lumpsum investments. This is right, but SIPs work best only if you last the entire tenure and don’t redeem units prematurely. Some investment consultants advise their clients to go in for SIPs because the entry load is waived off. Their argument is that since the entry load is waived off, then even if the client withdraws prematurely, the 2.00% exit load (approximately) is not really damaging as its just a charge for not paying the entry load. This argument is flawed because the entry and exit loads are charged on different amounts.
For example, from the above real life illustration its easy to understand how the exit load can be particularly high on premature redemptions from an SIP. Take the first SIP at an NAV of Rs 11.72 (in the table above); if the investor had entered one-time at that level at 2.00% entry load it would have cost him Rs 0.23 (2% of Rs 11.72). But since he has opted for the SIP route let us understand how a premature redemption works for him. Say, the investor wants to redeem his units by January 1, 2005 because the NAV has climbed significantly and he wants to capitalise on the opportunity. He will be slapped with a 2.00% exit load since the entry load was waived off on the SIP. However, the 2.00% exit load will be calculated on Rs 18.68, which amounts to Rs 0.37. Compare this with the Rs 0.23 he would have had to pay if he had entered lumpsum in August 2004. ...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
gv
Hi Bhavani,
Yes that is the point,i buy when the price is low relatively
Take care
Gv
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Gurus ,
Is it a right time to enter into market. My investment would be in the range of 1-1.5L and for a period of 2 years. Please suggest the sectors and the stocks which can possibly give me good returns. My current portfolio have stoks frm following sector :
OIL
Real Estate
IT
How abt banking sector ?
Thanks
...
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Yea ank,
before jan the fear factor was totally missing. Everyone thought that movement of markets is only one-sided. so the greedy paid the price. SIP is a nice averaging tool if invested in a good diversified fund.
cheers
shakti...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
ank1977
Market has given a serious message since january 2008, that one should fix his return, investment period. One should book his profit partial at regular interval, otherwise v can c the situation from january to till date. Almost every scripts either it is a large cap, midcap or small cap, fallen down almost 40-50%. Most of us have invested at the level, where actually one should exit and wait for the correction. Of course, the tempo at that time was amazing, everyone was thinking about 23000-25000 level, nobody was in the mood of book his profit. About SIP, it is best tool in any market, either it is a rising market or it is a falling market, end of the day ur average will come down automatically, if u r a disciplined investor thru SIP. Make it for at least 5 to 10 yrs, in between if u r making handsome profit, book some of that and continue with SIP.
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
20-25 should be a decent and safe horizon. treat this as a long term insurance plan. but please specify a genuine nominee ( you know why ). The returns will be manifold compared to traditional or ULIP insurance plans, plus the advantage to redeem anytime. ...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
jstocks
you have put a valid point here, I feel that SIP investments should be for a very long time frame. I would personally like to continue for abt 20 to 25 years, only then one can see the power of compounding
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Market has given a serious message since january 2008, that one should fix his return, investment period. One should book his profit partial at regular interval, otherwise v can c the situation from january to till date. Almost every scripts either it is a large cap, midcap or small cap, fallen down almost 40-50%. Most of us have invested at the level, where actually one should exit and wait for the correction. Of course, the tempo at that time was amazing, everyone was thinking about 23000-25000 level, nobody was in the mood of book his profit. About SIP, it is best tool in any market, either it is a rising market or it is a falling market, end of the day ur average will come down automatically, if u r a disciplined investor thru SIP. Make it for at least 5 to 10 yrs, in between if u r making handsome profit, book some of that and continue with SIP....
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
sp.palo
I may not be correct in my view .
But.. Suppose we invest in SIP for 3 years. Say the first 18 months markets rise 25% and the next 18 months the markets fall 30%, then what about the invested money. Someone may say that 4-5 years should be the horizon. Where is the end ?
My point is neither there is guarantee about the returns after a specific period nor we can specify a time frame as a safe horizon.So,book profits or redeem your funds after a predefined gain. Thats it. Greed has no end.
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Hi Bhavani,
Yes that is the point,i buy when the price is low relatively
Take care
Gv...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
Bhavani27
GV Uncle:
Isn\\`t an SIP of 1,000 INR due fifth of every month like a prior commitment to my grocer that whatever be the price I will buy Rs 1,000/- worth of rice on the fifth of every month. If this seems a ridiculous way of running the home why does everybody fall head over heels on the SIP schemes as they now exist. It would make more sense if my periodic investment was that I would buy 1,000 INR worth of rice whenever the price is between say 18 and 20 INR.
SAVAM KRISHNAARPANAM
Bhavani
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
GV Uncle:
Isn\\`t an SIP of 1,000 INR due fifth of every month like a prior commitment to my grocer that whatever be the price I will buy Rs 1,000/- worth of rice on the fifth of every month. If this seems a ridiculous way of running the home why does everybody fall head over heels on the SIP schemes as they now exist. It would make more sense if my periodic investment was that I would buy 1,000 INR worth of rice whenever the price is between say 18 and 20 INR.
SAVAM KRISHNAARPANAM
Bhavani ...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
gv
Hi braintalks,
Good post
But there are other considerations one can think of
It can be a raising market or a falling market
Why i should commit long term with the fund manager?
The reason,i know what is the fund i can allocate for sip
So if i do online investments when the index falls in installments
i can choose the timing on the other case i have no control only the fund manager has
Also why i should bank on one scheme?it may do well or may not
So why commit for long term?
Instead i can do online,the sachems i like depending on market condition
and Switch my predetermined funds to the schemes i like or do well
Earlier times online was not available and SIP was preferred
SIP is advantageous to the fund houses because they can know how much funds that are coming in and at what time
Moral of the story "they want to control their destiny"
Regds
GV
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
you have put a valid point here, I feel that SIP investments should be for a very long time frame. I would personally like to continue for abt 20 to 25 years, only then one can see the power of compounding...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
sp.palo
I may not be correct in my view .
But.. Suppose we invest in SIP for 3 years. Say the first 18 months markets rise 25% and the next 18 months the markets fall 30%, then what about the invested money. Someone may say that 4-5 years should be the horizon. Where is the end ?
My point is neither there is guarantee about the returns after a specific period nor we can specify a time frame as a safe horizon.So,book profits or redeem your funds after a predefined gain. Thats it. Greed has no end.
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
Hi braintalks,
Good post
But there are other considerations one can think of
It can be a raising market or a falling market
Why i should commit long term with the fund manager?
The reason,i know what is the fund i can allocate for sip
So if i do online investments when the index falls in installments
i can choose the timing on the other case i have no control only the fund manager has
Also why i should bank on one scheme?it may do well or may not
So why commit for long term?
Instead i can do online,the sachems i like depending on market condition
and Switch my predetermined funds to the schemes i like or do well
Earlier times online was not available and SIP was preferred
SIP is advantageous to the fund houses because they can know how much funds that are coming in and at what time
Moral of the story "they want to control their destiny"
Regds
GV
...
In reply to:
SIPs: A long-term investment strategy
Posted by :
braintalks
Systematic Investment Plans are much misunderstood. For one, investors often mistake SIPs as an investment avenue rather than a mode of investing in mutual funds. Then there are investors who invest in SIPs expecting quick results without fully appreciating the need to invest via SIPs for the long-term.
In an earlier article, we discussed how SIPs are perceived incorrectly by many investors as standalone investments. This explains why one of the most common queries we receive on the website is - which is the best SIP? Unfortunately, these investors have not been educated by their investment advisors about SIPs i.e. SIPs are only a mode of investing and not an independent investment avenue.
Which is the best SIP?
Minimum tenure of an SIP
Another misconception investors have about SIPs is with regards to the minimum tenure. Most fund houses have a minimum SIP tenure of 6 months. This leads investors to believe that 6 months is the ideal time frame for investing via SIPs (just like a lot of investors invest Rs 5,000 in mutual funds simply because that is the minimum investment amount for several mutual fund schemes).
In our view, investors should ideally invest via SIPs over at least 2-3 years. This way they can exploit the most critical benefit of an SIP - rupee cost averaging. Let's understand how this is possible.
For an SIP to deliver the goods, it must witness a falling market. This way the investor can average out his cost of purchase. If the investor does not witness a downturn, i.e. he is only exposed to a market rally, the average purchase cost of his SIP will rise over a period of time.
SIPs in a rising market
Month of investment NAV (Rs) No. of Units
January 11.00 45.45
February 12.00 41.67
March 12.50 40.00
April 12.90 38.76
May 13.25 37.74
June 13.40 37.31
Avg. purchase cost of 6 SIPs Rs 12.45
(The example is for illustrative purpose only.
We have assumed that the SIP is done on the first trading day of the month; SIP amount is Rs 500.)
In the above table the average purchase cost of the SIP is Rs 12.45. Clearly, the SIP has not worked in the investor's favour. Why is that? Because if he had instead invested lumpsum in January, his purchase cost would have been Rs 11.00 as opposed to the average purchase cost of Rs 12.45 over a 6-month period.
SIPs in a falling market
Month of investment NAV (Rs) No. of units
January 11.00 45.45
February 12.00 41.67
March 12.50 40.00
April 12.90 38.76
May 13.25 37.74
June 13.40 37.31
July 12.10 41.32
August 11.20 44.64
September 10.30 48.54
October 10.10 49.50
November 10.50 47.62
December 10.20 49.02
Avg. purchase cost of 12 SIPs Rs 11.50
(The example is for illustrative purpose only.
We have assumed that the SIP is done on the first trading day of the month; SIP amount is Rs 500.)
However, if the investor had opted for a longer investment tenure of say 12 months, he could have benefited from greater fluctuations in the mutual fund's NAV. These fluctuations which arise over a market cycle lower the average purchase cost of the SIP over the long-term.
This is apparent from the above illustration. As is evident from the table, if the investor had taken an SIP for 12 months (instead of 6 months) his average purchase cost would have declined to Rs 11.50. Compare this with the average purchase cost of Rs 12.45 for a 6-month SIP.
It can be argued that there is no way for the investor to know when there is likely to be a turnaround in the markets (in this case a downturn). That is exactly our point. Since the investor does not know when markets will fall (and lower his average purchase cost), he must opt for a longer SIP tenure. Or at least he must manage his investments in a manner so that when his existing SIP terminates without witnessing a dip in stock markets, he can extend it further. This way should the markets fall, his SIP can benefit from a dip in the mutual fund NAV which in turn will lower his average purchase cost.
Points to remember before opting for an SIP
1) Ironically, while SIPs are meant to eliminate market-timing, investors must opt for a long-enough SIP tenure so as to 'time' the market downturn.
2) SIPs are equally beneficial in a falling market. Most investors believe that lumpsum investments (as opposed to SIPs) prove more beneficial in a falling market. This is only partly true. Having an SIP in operation during a falling market can ensure that investors stand to benefit should markets fall even further.
Source: rediff
Poll
![]() |
Popular Boarders 7days| 179 | |
| 173 | |
| 145 | |
| 144 | |
| 109 | |
Top Tracked 7days| 823 | |




Offline






