Read
Listen
Watch
Play
Find
Mail
  • Quotes

  • NAVs

  • News

  • Messages

  • Opinions

  • Notices

  • Videos

  Post a Message | Explore Forums  |  Browse Stock Messages  |  Hot Discussions  | Top rated Messages  | Top Boarders
Search: Messages    Stock    Boarder
 
Message History | View by:
Messages From venkat_c
Replies to venkat_c

Also see venkat_c’s rated messages

The markets will have to go down below 7000 sensex to attract any fundamentally good buys.. cheers, Venkat, Training8m, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
12 Oct 2008 06:57
View full thread (1007 messages)

Tracked by: 6 Boarder

Hi Ramki,

I have been reading your messages but did not reply since no one was in mood to listen to my views of even sub 10000 levels, however, I had smelled the rat as the system was collapsing. I as Indian Born also would like Indian markets to prosper, but when the money has started going to wrong pockets, the hooligans stashing India`s wealth Abroad, and corrupt politicians making billions without having any credentials, what do you expect the markets to do. The markets were most vulnerable for attacks, and even today the markets are vulnerable even if you see minor dead cat bounce, the FII`s are also trapped in a big way. The people who made money are no longer seen in the markets. FII inflow stopped, Domestic people shying away, with weak sentiments even a strong fundamental company stock plummets, to any abnormal levels. Even when the markets had gone up it had extremely overstretched valuations of any company, the valuations of some stocks are still high, the companies need to shed some more fat before any buying comes in Indian stock Exchanges, hence be on sell side currently and sell at every rise and exit. Cheers, Venkat, Training8m, Queensland, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
5. This cycle kept on going. Who all were exposed? Banks for lending to sub prime borrowers, Investors for investing in MBS securities, Counterparty (I-banks and insurers) in Credit Default Swap for insuring the credit defaults. All this was fine but the circle became so vicious that all these institutions took over leveraged (beyond their capacity) positions in order to make quick bucks. So, sub-prime securities backed by loans to risky borrowers in the US found a huge market first in the US and then in Europe and Asia. This market included some of the top investment banks.

6. With interest rates and inflation rising in the US, EMI for these loans started going up and there was a sense of inability to repay the loan amongst these borrowers. They started defaulting. The Bank\`s had no option but to take possession of the mortgaged property and sell it off in the market to recover the dues. Slowly and steadily the market was flooded with Bank\`s offering to sell their mortgaged assets. The market had limited buyers and excessive sellers which resulted in crashing of real estate prices. The bubble had busted. Bank\`s suffered a loss on their home loan portfolio.

7. The MBS investors were not worried as their investment was backed by Credit default swap (deemed insurance). So they did not marked down the investments in their books. Claims were raised on to the CDS counterparty seller. The Banks or monoliners who had sold credit default protection were not in a position to honor all the claims as they were undercapitalized for the same. This was the reason Bear Sterns one of the largest I-bank collapsed in a jiffy. They had 45 trillion $ of CDS exposure which was 8% of the total CDS exposure in the market. Even if one big institution fails, institutions having hedged exposure with failing institutions , became naked and they in turn became over leveraged. There was a chain reaction to follow.
8. Credit rating agencies started downgrading these I-banks and Monoliners for their inability to pay future obligations. Downgrading of these institutions forced the Banks and other investors to make provision for MTM losses as per prudent accounting principles. Losses started mounting on to the books of these investors.
9. This started having cascading impact in the market with one after the other bank/financial institution was running out of capital and no body was ready to infuse capital in ailing institutions. Fed is trying its best to bail out institutions by infusing capital, nationalizing banks, etc
10. It all started with sub prime home loan but now it is spreading across all spectrums including prime loans, auto loans, credit cards, personal loans, etc. It is a vicious circle and this is the beginning of a Systemic financial crisis and this cyclone will strike with massive destruction.
11. To make up for their losses, the investors, Lending banks and institutions started selling their equity portfolio in the home market as well as across emerging markets. There was distress selling of equities across the world. The benchmark indices have slided down by more than 50% in all markets.
To summarise, sub prime loans is not the only root cause for the present financial debacle. The US government is equally responsible for its lax policy framework and poor governance. Why was CDS not regulated if its inherent nature was to provide insurance? Why were the statutory, exposure and prudential norms applicable to Hard core insurance companies not applicable to institutions undertaking CDS? Why did the auditors hide this fact in the balance sheets?
It is just the beginning. Just imagine when the 600 trillion $ + of CDS exposure will start coming on to the books of various institutions involved in the trap. A 700 bio$ bail out package is just a first aid treatment and not the solution. We would witness the biggest global financial meltdown ever in terms of value. It would take several years to recover from this attack.
Remark on this write up.....

Cheers,

Training8m, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
11 Oct 2008 13:59
View full thread (1 messages)

Tracked by: 0 Boarder

From earlier part...

4. This was not an end. The lending Banks like CitiGroup, Wachovia, etc pooled the sub-prime assets and I-banks like Merill, Lehman, etc sold it to other investors as mortgaged back securities. In simple terms investors like Mutual funds, Banks, Corporate treasuries invested in units of these mortgaged back securities in order to earn a higher rate of return over treasury return. Thus the repayment made by sub prime borrowers was passed on to the MBS investors in form of repayment of principal and interest. By this strategy banks converted 50% of their home loan receivables into liquid money. Given the fact that institutions giving out the loan did not take the risk, their incentive was in just giving out the loan. Whether the individual taking the home loan had the capacity to repay the loan or not, wasn\`t their problem. With stock markets booming and the system flush with liquidity, many big fund investors like hedge funds and mutual funds saw sub-prime loan portfolios as attractive investment opportunities. Hence they bought such portfolios from the original lenders. This in turn meant the lenders had fresh funds to lend. The sub-prime loan market thus became a fast growing segment. Thus, proper due diligence to give out the home loan was not done and loans were extended to individuals who were more likely to default. These banks also insured the risk of credit default by entering into credit derivatives. Credit default Swap (CDS) was one of the credit derivatives entered into by these banks to seek protection for credit default. The big question here was whether the person selling protection was capitalised enough? This was a form of private insurance which was not regulated by Fed. I-Banks and monoline insurers (who insure only mortgaged bonds) started selling credit default protection beyond their net worth. These underwriters hedged part of their CDS exposure by entering into credit derivatives with other banks/institutions. In December 2007, the Bank for International Settlements reported derivative trades tallying in at $681 trillion - ten times the gross domestic product of all the countries in the world combined. Being banks of the first order Credit rating agencies did not hesitate in giving the best rating to these bonds/units. Higher Credit rating for these bonds coupled with default insurance was an open invitation for Asset Management Companies, banks, etc to invest in them as their investment policies allowed investment in investment graded securities.

Remark on this write up.....Global Copy Rights reserved with Training8m

Training8m, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
We at Training8m feel, The recruitment portals have seen rise of 30-40% fresh resumes in last one month, that is in Monster, you have additional 5 Mn. Resumes which are fresh, now thats amazing and the situation on job front remains terrible. Venkat, Training8m, Queensland, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
Hi, Our Aussie Clients and corporate bodies, have been selling since the market was trading between 20000- 21000 sensex, hence the markets has no reason to bounce back, till the investments come back,maybe if the sensex comes to 3000-3500 levels safe bet, what say.. Cheers, Venkat, Training8m, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
Dear Mr. Udayan, Your views and outlook on markets the economic scenatio, is worth its weight in gold, Great !!!! Amazing to see such unique, powerful views !!! Cheers, I am Venkat from Training8m, Queensland, Australia...
Reply     Rate     Report It
             more

Feedback

venkat_c’s Network
Boarders Tracking venkat_c (1)
venkat_c Tracking Boarders (0)
venkat_c’s Interest Area
Tracked Topics
Tracked Threads (0)