1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Zenith Birla (India)
Limited as at 31st March, 2011, and the Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
(together the “Order”), issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of ‘The Companies Act, 1956’
of India (the Act’) and on the basis of such checks of the books and
records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to
the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order
to the extent applicable to the company.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011
from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Act.
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2011;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS'' REPORT
Referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditors’ Report of even date to the
members of Zenith Birla (India) Limited on the financial statements for
the year ended 31st March, 2011.
1. (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets. However, in respect of the Company’s Divisions at Tarapur and
Murbad, the fixed asset records are in the process of being updated.
(b) The fixed assets are physically verified by the management
according to a phased programme designed to cover all the items over a
period of three years, which in our opinion, is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.
Pursuant to the programme, a portion of the fixed assets has been
physically verified by the management during the year and no material
discrepancies between the book records and the physical inventory has
been noticed, except in the case of the Company’s Divisions at Tarapur
and Murbad, where the comparisons will be made once the records are
completed.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed
of by the Company during the year so as affect its going concern.
2. (a) The inventory has been physically verified by the management
during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable. Inventories lying with outside parties have
been confirmed by them at the close of the year.
(b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of
inventory followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the inventory records, in our
opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to book records were not material.
3. (a) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the maintained under
Section 301 of the Act.
(b) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods. There is
no sale of services during the year. Further, on the basis of our
examination of the books and records of the Company, and according to
the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come
across nor have been informed of any continuing failure to correct
major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system.
5. According to the information and explanations given to us, there
have been no contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of
the Act during the year, to be entered in the register required to be
maintained under that Section. Accordingly, the question of commenting
on transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements
does not arise.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the
Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no Order has been passed by the Company Law
Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any
Court or any other Tribunal on the Company in respect of the aforesaid
deposits.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company in respect of products where, pursuant to the Rules made by the
Central Government of India, the maintenance of cost records has been
prescribed under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the
Act and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts
and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a
detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether
they are accurate or complete.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, the Company
is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues
including provident fund, investor education and protection fund,
employees’ state insurance, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs
duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues as applicable
with the appropriate authorities. However, Dividend Distribution Tax
amounting to Rs 359.08 lacs remained in arrears as at the last day of
the financial year, for a period exceeding six months from the date it
became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, there were no disputed dues in
respect of income tax, wealth tax, service tax and cess. The
particulars of dues of custom duty, excise duty and sales-tax, as at
31st March, 2011 which have not been deposited on account of disputes
are as follows:
Nature of dues Amount Period to Forum Where the
which the dispute is
amount Pending
(Rs. in lacs) relates pending
Custom Duty 82.00 1998-1999 Tribunal
3.45 1985-1986 High Court
Excise Duty 129.78 1995-1996 Commissioner
Appeals
Sales Tax 78.88 1995-1996 Tribunal
10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 31st March 2011 and it
has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that
date or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanation given to us, the Company has not defaulted
in repayment of dues to any bank. There were no dues to any financial
institution or debenture holder during the year.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. In respect of shares, securities, debentures and other investments
dealt or traded by the Company, proper records have been maintained in
respect of the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been
made therein. All the investments are held by the Company in its own
name.
14. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from banks and financial institutions.
15. The Company has not obtained any term loan during the year.
16. On the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the
Company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long- term investment.
17. The Company has made a preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Act during the year and the price at which the shares have been
issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
18. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
19. The management has disclosed the end use of money raised by issue
of Global Depositary Receipts and we have verified the same.
20. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the Management.
21. The other clauses, (iii)(b), (iii)(c), (iii)(d), (iii)(f),
(iii)(g), and (xiii) of paragraph 4 of the Order, are not applicable in
the case of the Company for the current year, since in our opinion
there is no matter which arises to be reported in the aforesaid Order.
For Thakur, Vaidyanath Aiyar & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration Number: 000038N
C.V.Parameswar
Partner
M.No.: 11541
Place: Mumbai
Date : 30-05-2011
|