Real-time Stock quotes, portfolio, LIVE TV and more.
| Auditor's Report (Wartsila NSD India) | Year End : Dec '09 |
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of WARTSILA INDIA
LIMITED (the Company) as at 31st December, 2009 and the Profit and
Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Companyfortheyearended
on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, (the
Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section
227 (4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in the
paragraph 3 above, we report that:
(i) we have obtained all information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(ii) in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies
Act, 1956;
(v) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st December, 2009;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date and;
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
5. On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on 31st December, 2009, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors are disqualified as on
31st December, 2009 from being appointed as Director of the Company
under clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
1. In respect of the Companys fixed assets:
(a) TheCompanyhas maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and location of its fixed assets.
(b) The Companys fixed assets were physically verified by the
management in accordance with a programme of verification, which
provides physical verification of all fixed assets at intervals which
in our opinion are reasonable. According to the information and
explanation given to us no material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
(c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, do not constitute a
substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company and such disposal
has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern status of the
Company.
2. In respect of its inventories:
(a) As explained to us, inventories, excluding materials in transit
have been physically verified during the year by the management, in our
opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its
inventories. The discrepancies noticed between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material in relation to the operation of the
Company and the same have been properly dealt with in books of account.
3. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies,
firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4 (iii) (a)
to (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
4. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies,
firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph
4 (iii) (e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
5. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the Items
purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources do not
exist for obtaining comparable quotations, there are adequate internal
control systems commensurate with the size of the Company and the
nature of its business for the purchase of inventories and fixed assets
and with regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of
our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major
weaknesses in the internal control systems.
6. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that there are no
contracts or arrangements, the particulars of which need to be entered
in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
7. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within the
purview of Section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 read with
the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975. Therefore, the
provisions of paragraph 4 (vi) of the Order are not applicable to the
Company.
8. In our opinion, the Company has an adequate internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
9. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year, the Company has not manufactured any product covered by the
rules made by the Central Government for maintenance of cost records
under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and therefore, no
such records have been made and maintained during the year by the
Company.
10. In respect of statutory and other dues:
(a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us the Company has been regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues relating to provident fund, employees state insurance,
income tax, sales tax, state value added tax and investor education and
protection fund. The Company has been generally regular in depositing
undisputed statutory dues relating to service tax. Undisputed amount
payable in arrears, as at 31st December, 2009 for a period of more than
six months from the date they became payable are as under:
Name Nature of Period Amount Due
of the dues (Rs. in date
Statute thousands)
Professional Profession tax April 2008 to 42 15th of
Tax Laws June 2009 subsequent
month
Sales Tax Works Contract Details 724 Details
Laws tax unavailable unavailable
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us,
(i) There were no disputed dues as regards Wealth tax and
(ii) details of dues of income tax, sales tax, service tax, customs
duty, excise duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of
dispute are given below:
Name Nature of Financial year Forum where Amount
of the dues to which the the dispute is (Rs. in
Statute matter pending thousands)
pertains
Income tax Income tax 2005-2006 Commissioner 15,129
Act, 1961 (including of Income Tax
interest) (Appeals)
Sales Tax Sales Tax 2001-2002 Deputy 52,245
Laws (including 2002-2003 Commissioner
interest) 2003-2004 (Appeals),
2004-2005 Maharashtra
Sales Tax Sales Tax 2004-2005 Assistant 9,280
Laws (including Commissioner,
interest) New Delhi
Sales Tax Sales Tax 1992-1993 Orissa High 7,916
Laws (including Court
interest)
Central Excise duty 1995-1996 Tribunal 1,274
Excise Act,
1944 1994-1995 Commissioner 2,400
of Central
Excise
Finance Act,Service Tax 2003-2004 Assistant 324,873
1994 (Including 2004-2005 Commissioner
interest) 2005-2006 of Service tax
2007-2008
2008-2009
Finance Act,Service Tax 2005-2006 Commissioner 81,332
1994 of Central
Excise
Customs Custom duty 1993-1994 Bombay High 27,280
Act, 1962 (including Court
interest)
NMMC Cess Octroi duty 1997-1998 The District 4,499
Court, Thane
11. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at the year end.
The Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year
covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. There were no
amounts outstanding on account of debentures during the year.
13. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other investments.
Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4 (xii) of the Order are not
applicable to the Company.
14. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit society.
Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4 (xiii) of the Order are not
applicable to the Company.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing in shares, securities, debentures and other
investments. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4 (xiv) of the
Order are not applicable to the Company.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
17. The Company has not taken any term loan during the year covered by
our audit report. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4 (xvi) of the
Order are not applicable to the Company.
18. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the
Company, we report that, no funds raised on short term basis have been
used for long term investment.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or
companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
20. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not issued any secured debentures
during the period covered by our report. Accordingly, the provisions
of paragraph 4 (xix) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.
22. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company
was noticed or reported during the year.
For S. B. BILLIMORIA & CO.
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 101496W)
SANJIV V. PILGAONKAR
Partner
Membership No.: 39826
Mumbai: 22nd March, 2010 |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited | |
![]() | |