We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Walchandnagar Industries
Limited, as at 30th September, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto, in which are incorporated the returns of the divisions
at Zambia and Ethiopia audited by overseas local auditors and relied on
by us.
1. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A)
of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law, have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit
have been received from the divisions at Zambia and Ethiopia not
visited by us. The divisions'' overseas Auditors'' Reports have been
forwarded to us and appropriately dealt with;
(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account and with the audited returns from the divisions at Zambia and
Ethiopia;
(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and
cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on 30th September 2011 and taken on record by the Board
of Directors, we report that none of the Directors of the Company are
disqualified as on 30th September 2011, from being appointed as a
Director, in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) As stated in our earlier year''s audit report, no provision has
been made for the liability, if any, in respect of the Bank Guarantee
amounting to Rs 700 lacs invoked during the previous year and in respect
of Rs 744 lacs owed by a party appearing in the balance sheet under the
head Sundry Debtors as explained in the Note No. D 3(iii) of the
Schedule ''O''. Since the matter is under arbitration, we are unable to
opine on the likelihood of the liability devolving on the Company and
the consequent effect on its Profit and the Reserves and Surplus.
Subject to (vi) above, in our opinion and to the best of our
information and according to the explanations given to us, the said
accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 30th September, 2011;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITOR''S REPORT
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date,
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the Fixed
Assets.
(b) The Company has a programme for physical verification of the Fixed
Assets, which in our opinion is reasonable having regards to the nature
of the business. Accordingly, the Fixed Assets have been physically
verified by the management at the end of the year and no material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) The Fixed Assets disposed off during the year were not substantial.
According to the information and explanation given to us; we are of the
opinion that the disposal of the Fixed Assets has not affected the
going concern status of the company.
(ii) (a) The Management has conducted physical verification of the
inventory at reasonable intervals other than material lying with
sub-contractors, which have been substantially confirmed by them.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business
(c) The Company has maintained proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification as
compared to the book records.
(iii) (a) The Company has not granted/taken any secured or unsecured
loans to/from Companies, Firms or other parties covered in the Register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore,
sub-clauses (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of clause(iii) of the said
Order are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal
controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into
the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
have been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the registers maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. and exceeding the value of Rs Five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at price which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard
to the deposits accepted from the public. As informed to us, no order
has been passed by the Company Law Board, National Company Law Tribunal
or Reserve Bank of India or any other court or any other tribunal.
(vii) In our opinion, Company has an internal audit system commensurate
with size and nature of its business. .
(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records
under Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the company examined by us, the Company is generally
regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory
dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales-Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Custom Duty, Excise-Duty and Cess and other material statutory
dues applicable to it. There are no undisputed outstanding dues in
respect of the above items which are more than six months as at the
balance sheet date.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
disputed statutory dues on account of Sales Tax, Income-Tax, Customs
Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess that have not been
deposited on account of matters pending before appropriate authority
are as follows:
Name of Nature of
Dues Amount Period to Forum where
the (Rs in Lakhs) which the dispute is
Statute amount pending
relates
Central Denial of
exemption 266.19 (Net March, CESTAT,
Excise Act, availed under of CENVAT 2000 to Mumbai
1944 notification No. reversal
and March,
6/2002, for
supply payment) 2004
of biomass
based
boilers
Central Excise duty
demand 82.45 (Net June, 1983 Supreme
Excise Act, on
bought out of CENVAT to April, Court,
1944 items supplied reversal
and 2005 Delhi
for centri
fugals, payments)
which has
already
suffered
duty at
manufacturers
end
Maharashtra N.A. Tax 86.61 1982 to Tehsildar,
Land (Rs 20 lacs paid 2003 Indapur
Revenue under protest)
Code
Central
Sales The exemption 159.83 2005-06 Joint
Tax Act, from Tax for
transit Commissioner
1956 sale, U/s.
6(2)(b) is of Sales Tax
denied. Paid
Rs. 30 (Appeal),
Pune
lakhs under
protest
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses as at the end of
the financial year and has not incurred any cash losses in the current
year or in the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to
the financial institutions or banks or debenture holders during the
year.
(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis
of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
Company.
(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly the
provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) The term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they
were raised.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for
long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us
during the period covered by our audit report, the Company has not made
any preferential allotment of shares to the parties and companies
covered under the register maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act,
1956.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us during
the period covered by our audit report, the Company has not issued any
debentures.
(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us during
the period covered by our audit report, the Company has not raised any
money by public issue.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For K. S. Aiyar & Co.
Chartered Accountants
FRN 100186W
Satish K. Kelkar
Place : Mumbai Partner
Date : 22nd November, 2011 Membership No. 38934 |