1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Visaka Industries
Limited, as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit & Loss Account and also the
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies
Act, 1956, we annex hereto a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
4. Further to our Comments in the annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that;
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
Audit;
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of such
books;
c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) In our opinion the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956;
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March,
2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-
section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
i. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the State of Affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2011;
ii. in the case of the Profit & Loss account, of the Profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
iii. in the case of the Cash Flow statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure Re: Visaka Industries Limited
Referred to in Paragraph 3 of our report of even date
i. a. The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has a phased programme of verification of fixed assets that is
reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of
its business.
c. The Company has not disposed of any substantial part of its fixed
assets so as to affect its going concern status.
ii. a. The inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b. The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
c. The Company has maintained proper records of its inventories. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
iii. a. The Company has taken an unsecured loans from two parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs.1082.50
Lakhs and the year-end balance of loans taken is Rs.467.06 Lakhs. The
Company has not granted loan to any party covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
b. b. In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions on which loans have been taken from the parties covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
are not, prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
c. The Company is regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
d. There is no overdue amount of loans taken from the Company listed
in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956.
iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods. During
the course of our audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the
internal control system in respect of these areas.
v. a. According to the information and explanations given to us, we are
of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have
been so entered.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
vi. i. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has complied with the directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any
other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules
framed there under, where applicable have been complied with. We
are informed that no order has been passed by the Company Law Board or
National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or
any other Tribunal.
vii. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
viii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has made and maintained accounts and records
prescribed by the Central Government under section 209(1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956 in respect of textile division.
ix. a. According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the company examined by us, the Company is regular in
depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and
other statutory dues as applicable with the appropriates authorities
and there were no arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last
day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us and
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of sales tax,
income tax, customs duty, excise duty, service tax and wealth tax, as
at 31st March, 2011 which have not been deposited on account of dispute
pending, are as under:
Name of the Statute Nature of Amount
the Dues (Rs. in lakhs)
Income-Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2.34
Income-Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 39.41
Central Excise Act, 1944 Excise Duty 1323.85
Central Excise Act, 1944 Penalty 1323.85
Sales Tax Act – State of Bihar VAT/Interest/ 10.93
Penalty
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Central Sales Tax 3.23
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) Service Tax 1.76
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) Service Tax 1.67
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) Service Tax 2.09
Service Tax Service Tax 1.64
(Finance Act, 1994)
Name of the Statute Period to which Forum where dispute
the amount relates is pending
Income-Tax Act, 1961 F.Y 2002-2003 DCIT
Income-Tax Act, 1961 F.Y 2007-08 CIT (Appeals)
Central Excise Act, 1944 F.Y 2003-04 &
2004-05 CESTAT, Chennai
Central Excise Act, 1944 F.Y 2003-04 &
2004-05 CESTAT, Chennai
Sales Tax Act - State of Bihar F.Y 2005-06 Joint Commissioner
(Appeals)
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 F.Y 2008-09 Deputy Commissioner
(CT) Hyderabad
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) January 2005 To High Court
September 2005
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) October 2005 To High Court
March 2006
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) April 2006 To Bhandara Division,
September 2006 Nagpur
Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) October 2006 to Bhandara Division,
February 2007 Nagpur
x. The company has no accumulated losses and it has not incurred any
cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit or in the
immediately preceding financial year.
xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any
financial institution, bank or debenture holders.
xii. According to information and explanations given to us and based on
the documents and records produced to us, the Company has maintained
adequate documents and records in respect of loans and advances granted
by the Company on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares,
debentures and other securities.
xiii. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society. Accordingly the provisions of clause 4(xiii) if
the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
Company.
xiv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company is not dealing in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of
clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the Company.
xv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loan taken by
others from banks or financial institutions. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xv) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the Company.
xvi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised other than amounts temporarily invested pending
utilization of the funds for the intended use.
xvii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the
Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been
used for long term investments.
xviii. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
during the year to parties or companies covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xix. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
xx. The Company has not raised any funds on public issue and hence
disclosure on the end use of money raised by the public issue is not
applicable to the Company.
xxi. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, financial misappropriation of
Rs.16 Lakhs by an employee of the Company has been brought to the
notice of the Company during the year under audit and the amount
recovered through possession of employee''s property which is estimated
to cover the misappropriation.
For M. Anandam & Co.,
Chartered Accountants
A.V.Sadasiva
Partner
M.No.18404
Firm Regn. No.000125S
Place: Secunderabad
Date : 27th May, 2011
|