1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Vesuvius India
Limited (''the Company'') as at 31 December 2011, the Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended
on that date, annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (''the
Order''), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from directors as
on 31 December 2011, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 December
2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 274(1)(g)
of the Companies Act, 1956;
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of the affairs of the
Company asat31 December 2011;
ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its
fixed assets by which all fixed assets are verified in a phased manner
over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of
physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the
Company and the nature of its fixed assets. In accordance with this
programme, certain fixed assets were physically verified. No material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification carried out during the
year.
(c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and
therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.
(ii) (a) The inventory, except goods-in-transit, has been physically
verified by the management during the year.
In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.
(b) The procedures for the physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or
unsecured, to or from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchase of inventories and fixed assets and with regard to the sale
of goods and services. We have not observed any major weakness in the
internal control system during the course of the audit.
(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements
referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered
in the register required to be maintained under that section.
(b) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts and
arrangements referred to in (a) above and exceeding the value of Rs. 5
lakh with any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time except for purchases of certain items of inventories and fixed
assets that are for the Company''s specialised requirements and
similarly for sale of certain goods for specialised requirements of
buyers for which suitable sources are not available to obtain
comparable quotations. However, on the basis of information and
explanations provided, the same appear reasonable.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during
the year.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with size and nature of its business.
(viii) The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of
cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act 1956 for any
of the products manufactured/services rendered by the Company.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts
deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax,
Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, and other material
statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year
by the Company with appropriate authorities.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Investor
Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax,
Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, and
other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 December 2011,
for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
are no dues of Wealth tax which have not been deposited with the
appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.
According to the information and explanations given to us, dues of
Income tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Excise duty and Custom Duty which
have not been deposited on account of any dispute are listed below:
Name of the
statute Nature of
the dues Amount Period Forum where
dispute is pending
Income
Tax
Act,1961 Disallowances
arising in
income 66,064 Assessment
years Hon''ble High
Court of
tax
proceedings
(Net of
deposit 1997-98 to
2008-09 Calcutta,Income
Tax
of
Rs. 905,819
thousands) Appellate Tribunal,
Commissioner of
Income Tax
(Appeals)
Central
Excise
Act,1944 Disallowance
of Cenvat
Credit 608 Nov 2000,
2007-2008 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Central
Excise
Act,1944 For non
payment of
Excise 14,149 2000 Central Excise
and Service
Duty on
Service
Charges Tax Appellate
Tribunal,
and
Machine
hire
charges Additional
Commissioner
Central
Excise
Act,1944 Penalty
for
delayed
payment 1,949 June 1999to
April 2000 Central Excise
and Service
of
differential
excise duty
for Tax Appellate
Tribunal
supply of
goods under
Advance
Intermediate
licence.
Customs
Act,1962 Classification
of High
Alumina 1,555 2005-06
till date Commissioner of
Cement Customs
Service
Tax For Non /
short payment 1,971 2006-2007,
2007-08, Commissioner
(Appeals),
of payment
of service
tax 2008-09,
2009-10, Additional
Commissioner of
2010-2011 Service Tax,
Deputy
Commissioner
Central
Sales
Tax Duetonon-
submission
of 6,021 2007-08,
2008-09 Sales Tax
Appellate
declaration
form. 2009-10,
2010-2011 Tribunal,
Commissioner
(Net of
deposit of (Appeals),
Assistant
Rs. 8,299
thousand) Commissioner
State
Sales
Tax Disallowance
of Input
credit 4,352 2005-06,
2006-07,
2007-08, Commissioner
(Appeals)
2008-09
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses in the financial
year and in the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its
bankers or to any financial institution. The Company did not have any
outstanding debentures during the year.
(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis
of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we are of
the opinion that the funds raised on short-term basis and repaid during
the year have not been used for long-term investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to companies/firms/parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For BSR& Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm''s Registration No. 101248W
Vikram Advani
Partner
Place: Kolkata
Date : 29 February 2012 Membership Number No.091765 |