United Spirits
BSE: 532432 | NSE: MCDOWELL-N | ISIN: INE854D01016 | Breweries & Distilleries
- Directors Report
- Chairman's Speech
- Auditors Report
- Notes To Accounts
- Accounting Policy
- Finished Products
- Raw Materials
| Notes to Accounts | Year End : Mar '09 |
Rs. Million
2009 2008
1. Contingent Liabilities
a) (i) Guarantee given on behalf of other
bodies corporate(including performance
guarantees) 31,397.558 24,887.119
(ii) Guarantees given by the Companys bankers
for which Counter Guarantees have been
given by the Company 172.217 125.151
b) Disputed claims against the Company not
acknowledged as debts, currently under
appeal/sub judice:
(i) Excise demands for excess wastages and
distillation losses 238.384 176.179
(ii) Other miscellaneous claims 244.274 215.178
(iii) Income Tax demand (including interest)
under appeal 305.186 198.175
(iv) Sales Tax demands under appeal in
various states 604.036 634.134
c) Co-accepted bills of Tie-up Units-since
fully settled 15.016 216.740
d) Claims from suppliers not acknowledged as debts 45.449 50.967
The Management is hopeful of succeeding in the above appeals/ disputes
based on legal opinions/ legal precedents.
2. A. The Scheme of Amalgamation under Section 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 for the amalgamation of Shaw Wallace & Company
Limited (SWCL), a subsidiary company, and Primo Distributors Private
Limited (Primo), a wholly owned subsidiary company, (together
Transferor Companies) with the Company (the Scheme) and their
respective shareholders, with April 1,2007 being the Appointed Date,
has been sanctioned by the Honble High Court of Kamataka, the Honble
High Court of Judicature at Bombay and the Honble High Court at
Calcutta.
Upon necessary filings with the respective Registrar of Companies, the
Scheme has become effective on July 6, 2009 and the effect thereof have
been given in these accounts. Consequently,
a. In terms of the Scheme the entire business and undertaking of
Transferor Companies including all assets and liabilities, as a going
concern, stand transferred to and vested in the Company (hereinafter
referred to as Amalgamation) with effect from April 1, 2007 being the
Merger Appointed Date.
b. Primo ceased to be subsidiary of the Company and Shaw Wallace
Breweries Limited (SWBL) became a direct subsidiary of the Company.
Primo stands dissolved without being wound up. SWCL will be dissolved
without winding up by separate order by the Honble High Court at
Calcutta.
SWCL was engaged in manufacture and sale of potable alcohol and Primo
was engaged in the business of distribution of alcoholic beverages.
(I) In consideration of the amalgamation, the Company will issue :
a) 7,749,121 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each aggregating to Rs.77.491
Million in the ratio of 4 (four) fully paid up Equity Shares of the
face value of Rs.10/- each of the Company for every 17 (Seventeen)
fully paid up equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in SWCL [also refer
Note 2 (A)(ll) below].
Pending issue of these Equity Shares, a sum of Rs. 77.491 Million has
been shown under Equity Share Capital Suspense. Subsequently, on July
24, 2009, the allotment of the Companys shares to the eligible
shareholders of SWCL has been completed. Steps have been taken to list
the shares with the stock exchanges where the existing shares of the
Company are currently listed.
b) As Primo was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, no
consideration was payable pursuant to amalgamation of Primo with the
Company.
(II) Pursuant to the Scheme, Equity Shares to be issued as above
include 4,925,231 Equity Shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up to Palmer
Investment Group Limited(Palmer), R.G.Shaw & Company Limited (R G
Shaw), JIHL Nominees Limited (JIHL Nominees), Shaw Scott & Company
Limited (Shaw Scott), Shaw Darby & Company Limited (Shaw Darby) and
Thames Rice Milling Company Limited (Thames Rice), subsidiaries of the
Company, in exchange for the 20,932,244 Equity Shares of Rs,10/- each
fully paid up held by them in the share capital of SWCL, in the
proportion of Equity Shares heldby them respectively.
(III) Pursuant to the Scheme, 10,282,553 Equity Shares of Rs.10/- each
fully paid up held by SWCL and 1,306,431 Equity Shares of Rs.10/- each
fully paid up held by Primo in the share capital of the Company, were
to be transferred to the SWCL Benefit Trust and the Primo Benefit Trust
established by virtue of trust deeds dated July 25, 2008 for the
benefit of SWCL and Primo respectively. Upon the Scheme becoming
effective, the beneficial interest in SWC Benefit Trust and Primo
Benefit Trust stands transferred and vested in the USL Benefit Trust
established by virtue of trust deed dated September 26, 2006 for the
benefit of the Company. Subsequent to the year end, on June 30, 2009
SWCL has sold 10,282,553 Equity Shares held by it in the Company in the
open market, through the stock exchanges and 1,306,431 Equity shares
held by Primo in the Company has been transferred to Primo Benefit
Trust on July 6, 2009 which stands vested with USL Benefit Trust in
terms of the Scheme.
(IV) Pursuant to the scheme, the Authorised Share Capital of the
Company stands increased and reclassified, without any further act or
deed on the part of the Company, including payment of stamp duty and
Registrar of Companies fees, by the authorised share capital of the
transferor companies amounting to Rs 2,092 Million and the Memorandum
of Association and Articles of Association of the Company stand amended
accordingly without any further act or deed as the part of the Company.
(V) Accounting for Amalgamation
The amalgamation of the Transferor Companies with the Company is
accounted for on the basis of the Purchase Method as envisaged in the
Accounting Standard (AS) -14 on Accounting for Amalgamations specified
in the Companies (Accounting Standard) Rules 2006 and in terms of the
Scheme, as below:
a. All tangible assets [excluding investment in shares held by the
Transferor Companies in the Company and the interest in the USL Benefit
Trust in accordance with the terms of the Scheme as explained in Note
2(A)(III) above] and liabilities of the Transferor Companies at their
respective fair values.
b. Interest in USL Benefit Trust, arising from the terms of the Scheme
as explained in Note 2(A)(III) above, has been accounted as Investment,
valued and recorded, in the manner prescribed in the Scheme, at the
average of the weekly high and low of the closing price of the Company,
on the stock exchange where the shares of the Company are more
frequently traded in terms of turnover, for the period ended six months
preceding the Appointed Date, i.e. April 1, 2007, aggregating to Rs.
9,256.006 Million.
c. The equity shares directly held by the Company in the Transferor
Companies stand cancelled and debited to General Reserve of the Company
[refer (d) below].
d. Rs.7,860.187 Million, being the difference between the value of net
assets of the Transferor Companies transferred to the Company
(determined as stated above) and the face value of equity shares to be
issued and after adjusting for the equity shares directly held by the
Company in the Transferor Companies which are cancelled, is credited to
General Reserve of the Company. This accounting treatment of the
reserve has been prescribed in the Scheme. Had the Scheme not
prescribed this treatment, this amount would have been credited to
Capital Reserve.
e. The Company, based on the reports by an Independent valuer, has
revalued, at their respective fair values, all fixed assets being Land,
Buildings, Plant and Machinery, Furniture and Fixtures and Office
Equipment and Vehicles, at one location, as at April 1, 2007 and an
amount of Rs. 80.704 Million, being diminution in value of certain
Plant and Machinery determined based on their respective disposal value
as estimated by the independent valuer, has been debited to General
Reserve. This accounting treatment has been prescribed in the Scheme.
Had the scheme not prescribed this treatment, Rs.80.704 Million being
diminution in value of certain fixed assets would have been debited to
the Profit and Loss Account for the year instead of General Reserve,
having corresponding impact on the net profit for the year.
B. The Scheme of Amalgamation under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies
Act, 1956 for the amalgamation of Zelinka Limited (Zelinka or the
Transferor Company), Cyprus, with the Company (the ZL Scheme) and
their respective shareholders, with April 1, 2007 being the Appointed
Date, has been sanctioned by Honble High Court of Karnataka and the
certified copy of the Order of the Honble High Court of Karnataka has
been filed with the Registrar of Companies. Zelinka has complied with
the procedure required to be followed under the local corporate laws of
Cyprus to give effect to the ZL Scheme. Accordingly, the ZL scheme
became operative from March 26, 2009. The Company has given effect to
the ZL Scheme in these accounts with effect from April 1, 2007 being
the Appointed Date. Consequently, in terms of the ZL Scheme:
a. The entire business and undertaking of Zelinka including all assets
and liabilities, as a going concern, stand transferred to and vested in
the Company with effect from April 1, 2007 being the Merger Appointed
Date.
b. Zelinka ceased to be a subsidiary of the Company. Palmer Investment
Group Ltd, British Virgin Islands and Montrose International SA, Panama
have become direct wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Liquidity
Inc has become direct subsidiary of the Company.
Zelinka was engaged in Investment related activities.
(I) As Zelinka was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, no
consideration was payable pursuant to the amalgamation of Zelinka with
the Company.
(II) Accounting treatment
The amalgamation of Zelinka with the Company is accounted for on the
basis of the Purchase Method as envisaged in the Accounting Standard
(AS) -14 on Accounting for Amalgamations specified in the Companies
(Accounting Standard) Rules 2006 and in terms of the Scheme, as below:
a) All assets and liabilities of the Transferor Company at their
respective book values.
b) The investment held by the Company irTthe equity share capital of
the Transferor Company stands cancelled and debited to General Reserve
of the Company [refer (c) below].
c) Rs. 11.152 Million being the difference between the value of net
assets of the Transferor Company transferred to the Company (determined
as stated above) after adjusting for investments cancelled is debited
to General Reserve of the Company. This accounting treatment of the
reserve has been prescribed in the ZL Scheme. Had the ZL Scheme not
prescribed this treatment, this amount would have been debited to
Goodwill, which would have been charged to the Profit and Loss Account
for the year as per the accounting policy of the Company, with a
corresponding impact on the net profit for the year.
d) Interest free loans in foreign currency aggregating to Rs. 7,345.279
Million as on April 1, 2007, granted by the Company to Zelinka for
acquisition of long term strategic investments, stand cancelled.
Exchange difference on such loans aggregating to Rs.144.912 Million as
on April 1, 2007, accumulated by the Company in Foreign Currency
Translation Reserve, has been transferred to General Reserve. This
accounting treatment of the reserve has been prescribed in the ZL
Scheme. Had the ZL Scheme not prescribed this treatment, this amount
would have been debited to the Profit and Loss Account for the year
instead of General Reserve, having corresponding impact on the net
profit for the year.
Exchange differences of Rs. 570.131 Million on loan to Zelinka arising
during the year ended March 31, 2008 stands reversed on cancellation of
such loans on amalgamation.
C. All costs and expenses (including those of the Transferor Companies)
incidental with the finalisation of the schemes and to put these into
operation, including expenses in connection with excise and label
re-registrations, all advisory fees, stamp duty charges, meeting
expenses, professional fees, consultant fees including expenses and
other expenses or charges attributable to the implementation of the
Scheme (expenses relating to amalgamation), aggregating to Rs.146.879
Million are debited to General Reserve in the books.
This accounting treatment of the costs and expenses has been prescribed
in the Scheme. Had the Scheme not prescribed this treatment, this
amount would have been debited to the Profit and Loss Account for the
year instead of General Reserve, having corresponding impact on the net
profit for the year.
E. The Board of Directors of the erstwhile Central Distilleries &
Breweries Limited (CDBL) (amalgamated with erstwhile SWDL amalgamated
with the Company in an earlier year) on April 29,1986 decided to issue
134,700 Equity Shares of Rs.10 each, the allotment whereof was stayed
by the Honble High Court of Delhi on September 13,1988. The Honble
High Court of Delhi had vacated its order and has ordered to keep in
abeyance the allotment on 72,556 shares and the matter is sub-judice.
The holders, in exchange of these shares will be entitled to 17,776
equity shares of Rs.10 each of the Company pursuant to a Scheme of
Arrangement. Necessary adjustments in this respect will be carried out
on disposal of the matter pending before the aforesaid Court.
F. Pursuant to the Scheme of amalgamation, the bank accounts,
agreements, licences and certain immovable properties are in the
process of being transferred in the name of the Company.
3. The Board of Directors of the Company at their meeting held on
November 29, 2008 have approved the proposal of merger of Balaji
Distilleries Limited with the Company with effect from April 1, 2009 as
per the Scheme of Arrangement between BDL, Chennai Breweries Private
Limited and the Company, subject to the necessary approvals.
The Draft Rehabilitation Scheme along with the Scheme of Arrangement is
pending with the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction
formed under the provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special
Provisions) Act, 1985, for approval.
4. Fixed Assets
Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital
account and not provided for (net of advances) - Rs.106.562 Million
(2008: Rs.219.396 Million).
5. Current Assets, Loans and Advances
a) Loans and Advances include:
i) Rs. 11,093.202 Million (2008: Rs.14,987.889 Million) given as loan
to the subsidiaries. The entire loan is non interest bearing.
ii) An amount of Rs. 736.429 Million (2008: Rs. 489.847 Million) due
from a Tie-up unit secured by the assets of the Tie-up unit.
iii) An amount of Rs. 250 Million (2008: Rs. Nil) due from a proposed
tie-up unit secured by the shares of the proposed tie-up unit.
iv) Rs.3 Million (2008: Rs.3 Million) being amount paid to BDA Limited
(BDA) towards reassignment of certain Liquor Brands/ Trade Marks
pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding dated March 20, 1992. Pending
execution of the deed for such assignments and judicial resolutions of
various disputes with BDA pertaining to control of BDA and ownership of
the Officers Choice and other brands currently sub-judice at the
various courts, the advance given to the party has been provided for as
a matter of prudence. All consequential adjustments arising out of the
above matters will be made as and when ascertained.
v) Due from an Officer of the Company Rs. 1.193 Million (2008: Rs.1.085
Million). Maximum amount outstanding at anytime during the year Rs.
1.193 Million (2008: Rs.1.085 Million).
vi) Due from the Managing Director of the Company Rs. 3.140 Million
(2008: Rs. 2.854 Million). Maximum amount outstanding at any time
during the year Rs. 3.140 Million (2008: Rs. 2.854 Million).
b) Certain confirmation of balances from Sundry Debtors, Loans and
Advances, Deposits and Sundry Creditors are awaited and the account
reconciliations of some parties where confirmations have been received
are in progress. Adjustment for differences, if any, arising out of
such confirmations/reconciliations would be made in the accounts on
receipt of such confirmations and reconciliation thereof. The
Management is of the opinion that the impact of adjustments, if any, is
not likely to be significant. In the opinion of the management, all
current assets, loans and advances including advances on capital
accounts would be realised at the values at which these are stated in
the accounts, in the ordinary course of business.
c) Bank Balance with scheduled bank includes Rs. 154.000 Million (2008:
Rs. 205.960 Million) out of the proceeds of the beer business of
erstwhile SWCL, sold in an earlier year. The said sum is kept under
escrow pending resolution of various taxation matters.
d) The Company has, granted interest free loans in foreign currency
amounting to Rs.7,435.245 Million [2008: Rs. 6190.725 Million,
excluding Rs. 6836.073 Million, relating to Zelinka cancelled on
amalgamation as referred to in Note 2(B)(ll)(d) above] to USL Holdings
Limited, BVI (USL Holdings), a subsidiary of the Company, for
acquisition of long term strategic investments. Management is of the
view that out of these loans, Rs.3,630.300 Million (2008: Rs. 3,987.000
Million), from the inception of the grant of loans, in substance, form
part of the Companys net investment in the subsidiary, as the
settlement of these loans is neither planned nor likely to occur in the
foreseeable future and management intends to convert these loans into
investment in share capital of the subsidiary in near future.
Accordingly, in accordance with AS 11 - The Effects of Changes in
Foreign Exchange Rates (AS 11), exchange difference aggregating to
Rs.463.905 Million [2008: Rs. 106.905 Million excluding Rs.715.043
Million relating to loans to Zelinka referred in Note 2(B)(ll)(d)
above] arising on such loans has been accumulated in a foreign currency
translation reserve, which at the time of the disposal of the net
investment in these subsidiaries would be recognised as income or as
expenses.
6. Investment (Contd.)
b) Investment in USL Benefit Trust represents beneficial interest in
USL Benefit Trust which holds 13,741,643 (2008: 2,152,659) equity
shares of Rs 10 each of the Company, with all additions or accretions
thereto in trust for the benefit of the Company. The above includes
10,282,533 shares held by erstwhile SWCL, a transferor company, in the
Company referred to in Note 2 (A) (III) above.
c) The carrying cost of investment in Palmer Investment Group Limited
amounting to Rs. 6,917.801 Million, substantially exceeds the net worth
and the market value of shares held directly and indirectly through
subsidiary, by it. The management of the Company believes that this
reflects intrinsic value far in excess of the carrying cost of
investments and that such shortfall in net worth / decline in market
value of such shares is purely temporary in nature and, hence, no
provision is considered necessary for the same.
7. As required under Section 205C of the Companies Act, 1956, the
Company has transferred Rs. 4.678 Million (2008 : Rs. 10.517 Million)
to the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) during the year.
On March 31, 2009, no amount was due for transfer to the IEPF.
8. Interest on inter corporate deposit included under Unsecured Loan -
Other in Schedule 4 acquired on amalgamation, where negotiation/
settlement has not been finalised, has been provided in terms of the
decree and / or otherwise considered adequate by the management. In the
opinion of the management, interest so far provided is adequate and no
further provision is necessary in this respect. Adjustments, if any,
are carried out as and when the amounts are determined on final
disposal / settlement of the matter.
9. Employee Benefits
a) Defined Contribution Plans
The Company offers its employees defined contribution plans in the form
of Provident Fund (PF) and Employees Pension Scheme (EPS) with the
government, Superannuation Fund (SF) and certain state plans such as
Employees State Insurance (ESI). PF and EPS cover substantially all
regular employees while the SF covers certain executives and the ESI
covers certain workers. Contribution to SF is made to trust managed by
the Company, while other contributions are made to the Governments
funds. While both the employees and the Company pay predetermined
contributions into the provident fund and the ESI Scheme, contributions
into the pension fund and the superannuation fund are made only by the
Company. The contributions are normally based on a certain proportion
of the employees salary.
b) Defined Benefit Plans
Gratuity:
The Company provides for gratuity, a defined benefit plan, (the
Gratuity Plan), to certain categories of employees. The Gratuity Plan
provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement or
termination of employment, an amount based on the respective employees
last drawn salary and years of employment with the Company. The Company
has employees gratuity funds managed by the Company as well as by
Insurance Companies.
Provident Fund:
For certain executives and workers of the Company, contributions are
made as per applicable Indian laws towards Provident Fund to certain
Trusts set up and managed by the Company, where the Companys
obligation is to provide the agreed benefit to the employees and the
actuarial risk and investment risk fall, in substance, on the Company.
Having regard to the assets of the Fund and the return on the
investments, shortfall in the assured rate of interest notified by the
Government, which the Company is obliged to make good is determined
actuarially.
Death Benefit:
The Company provides for Death Benefit, a defined benefit plan (the
Death Benefit Plan) to certain categories of employees. The Death
Benefit Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees on death,
an amount based on the respective employees last drawn salary and
remaining years of employment with the Company after adjustments for
any compensation received from the insurance company and restricted to
limits set forth in the said plan. The Death Benefit Plan is
Non-Funded.
10. Segment Reporting
The Company is engaged in the business of manufacture, purchase and
sale of Beverage Alcohol (Spirits and Wines) including through Tie-up
units/ brand franchise, which constitutes a single business segment.
The Companys operations outside India did not exceed the quantitative
threshold for disclosure envisaged in AS 17 on Segment Reporting
specified in the Companies (Accounting Standard) Rules 2006. In view of
the above, primary and secondary reporting disclosures for
business/geographical segment as envisaged in AS-17 are not applicable
to the Company.
11. Related Party Disclosures
a) Names of related parties and description of relationship Enterprise
where there is control i) Subsidiary Companies:
1) United Spirits Nepal Private Limited (USNPL), 2) Asian Opportunities
& Investment Limited (AOIL), 3) Bouvet- Ladubay S.A.S (BL)^, 4) Chapin
Landais S.A.S (CL)^, 5) Palmer Investment Group Limited(PIG)^, 6)
Montrose International SA (MI)^, 7) JIHL Nominees Limited (JIHL)^, 8)
RG Shaw & Company Limited (RGSC)^, 9) Shaw Darby & Company Limited
(SDC)^, 10) Shaw Scott & Company Ltd (SSC)^, 11) Thames Rice Milling
Company Limited (TRMCL)^, 12) Shaw Wallace Overseas Limited (SWOL)^,
13) McDowell (Scotland) Limited (MSL), 14) USL Holdings Limited
(USLHL), 15) Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited (RCSPL), 16)
Spring Valley Investment Holdings Inc (SVIHI)\ 17) USL Holdings (UK)
Limited^, 18) United Spirits (UK) Limited^, 19) United Spirits (Great
Britain) Limited^, 20) Shaw Wallace Breweries Limited (SWBL), 21)
Ramanretti Investment & Trading Limited (RITL)^, 22) Daffodils
Fragrance and Flavours Private Limited (DFFPL), 23) Four Seasons Wines
Private Limited (FSWPL), 24)Herbertsons Limited (HL), 25) United
Vintners Limited (UVL), 26) United Alcobev Limited (UAL) , 27) McDowell
Beverages Limited (MBL), 28) McDowell & Company Limited, 29) Jasmine
Flavours and Fragrances Limited, 30) Liquidity Inc, 31) Whyte and
Mackay Group Limited^, 32) Whyte and Mackay Holdings Ltd^, 33) Whyte
and Mackay Limited (W&M), 34) Whyte and Mackay Warehousing Limited^,
35) Bruce & Company (Leith) Limited^, 36) Charles Mackinlay & Company
Limited^, 37) Dalmore Distillers Limited^, 38) Dalmore Whyte & Mackay
Limited^, 39) Edinburgh Scotch Whisky Company Limited^, 40) Ewen &
Company Limited^, 41) Fettercairn Distillery Limited^, 42) Findlater
Scotch Whisky Limited^, 43) Glayva Liqueur Limited^, 44) Glentalla
Limited^, 45) GPS Realisations Limited^, 46) Grey Rogers & Company
Limited^, 47) Hay & MacLeod Limited^, 48) Invergordon Distillers
(Holdings) Limited^, 49) Invergordon Distillers Group Limited^, 50)
Invergordon Distillers Limited^, 51) Invergordon Gin Limited^, 52) Isle
of Jura Distillery Company Limited^, 53) Jarvis Halliday & Company
Limited^, 54) John E McPherson & Sons Limited^, 55) Kensington
Distillers Limited^, 56) Kyndal Spirits Limited^, 57) Leith Distillers
Limited^, 58) Loch Glass Distilling Company Limited^, 59) Longman
Distillers Limited^, 60) Lycidas (437) Limited^, 61) Pentland Bonding
Company Limited^, 62) Ronald Morrison & Company Limited^, 63) St The
Sheep Dip Whisky Company Limited^, 64) Vincent Street (437) Limited^,
65) Tamnavulin-Glenlivet Distillery Company Limited^, 66) TDL
Realisations Limited^, 67) W & S Strong Limited^, 68) Watson &
Middleton LimitedA 69) Wauchope Moodie & Company Limited^, 70) Whyte &
Mackay Distillers Limited^, 71) William Muir Limited^, 72) WMB
Realisations Limited^, 73) Whyte and Mackay Property Limited^, 74)
Whyte and Mackay de Venezuela CA^, 75) Kl Trustees Limited^, 76) USL
Shanghai Trading Company Limited *.
* Became a subsidiary during the year ^ No transactions during the
year.
ii) USL Benefit Trust
Associates with whom transactions have taken place during the year
Utkal Distilleries Ltd (Utkal) (upto July 25, 2008) and Wine Soc. of
India Private Limited.
Key Management personnel
Mr. V.K.Rekhi, Managing Director
Employees Benefit Plans where there is significant influence:
Mc Dowell & Company Limited Staff Gratuity Fund (McD SGF), McDowell &
Company Limited Officers Gratuity Fund (McD OGF), SWDL Group Officers
Gratuity Fund (SWDL OGF), SWDL Employees Gratuity Fund (SWDL EGF),
Herbertsons Limited Employees Gratuity Fund (HL EGF), Phipson & Company
Limited Management Staff Gratuity Fund. (PCL SGF), Phipson & Company
Limited Gratuity Fund. (PCL GF), Carew & Company Ltd. Gratuity Fund
(CCL GF), McDowell & Company Limited Provident Fund (McD PF),
Herbertsons Limited Executives Provident Fund (HL EPF) and The Bengal
Distilleries Company Limited Staff Provident Fund (BD PF), Shaw Wallace
& Associated Companies Employees Gratuity Fund (SWCEGF), Shaw Wallace &
Associated Companies Executive Staff Fund (SWCSGF), Shaw Wallace & Co.
Associated Companies Provident Fund (SWCPF).
12. (a) The Companys significant leasing arrangements in respect of
operating leases for premises (residential, office, stores, godown,
manufacturing facilities etc), which are not non-cancellable, range
between 11 months and 3 years generally (or longer in certain cases)
and are usually renewable by mutual consent on mutually agreeable
terms. The aggregate lease rentals payable are charged as Rent under
Schedule 15 to the accounts.
Leasing arrangements entered into prior to April 1, 2001 have not been
considered for treatment under AS 19 Accounting for Leases.
(b) The Company has acquired computer equipment and cars on finance
leases. The lease agreement is for a primary period of 48 months for
computer equipment and 36 months to 60 months for cars. The Company has
an option to renew these leases for a secondary period. There are no
exceptional/restrictive covenants in the lease agreements.
13. a) Previous years figures have been regrouped / rearranged
wherever necessary.
b) In view of the amalgamation described in Note 2 above, the figures
for the year ended March 31, 2009 are not comparable with those of
previous year. |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Religare Technova | |
![]() | |




Online










