Teledata Informatics
BSE: 532358 | NSE: TELEDATAGL | ISIN: INE480B01022 | Computers - Software Medium/Small
- Directors Report
- Chairman's Speech
- Auditors Report
- Notes To Accounts
- Accounting Policy
- Finished Products
- Raw Materials
| Auditor's Report | Year End : Mar '08 |
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of TELEDATA INFORMATICS LTD
(the Company) as at March 31, 2008, and also the Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended
on that date both annexed thereto in which are incorporated the returns
from the USA Branch and Dubai Branch audited by another firm of
auditors. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys Management.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit and audit report of
overseas branch auditors.
1 .We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 and on the basis of such checks
as we considered appropriate, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order to the extent
applicable to the Company.
3. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraphs
(2) above, we report that:
a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books and proper returns adequate for the purpose of audit have been
received from the Branches not visited by us. The Branch auditors
report has been forwarded to us and appropriately dealt with.;
c) the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956 except for non compliance in respect of prescribed
method of valuation of employee benefits and required disclosures in
accordance with Accounting Standard 15 -Employee Benefits (revised
2005), issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
e) on the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on March 31st, 2008, and taken on record by the Board of Directors
of the Company, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as
on March 31 st, 2008 from being appointed as a director in terms of
clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956.
4. Financial statements of overseas branches which reflect total
assets of Rs. 156.18 Crore as at March 31st, 2008, total revenues of
Rs. 310.38 Crore and net profits amounting to Rs.56.13 Crore for the
year then ended, have been audited by branch auditors whose reports
have been furnished to us, and our opinion, in so far as it relates to
the amounts included in respect of these overseas branches, is based
solely on their reports.
5. a)We draw attention to Note no.20 of Schedule Q on booking of
revenue on sale of products to marketing agents.
Thequantification and evaluation of amount for products lying unsold
cannot be determined.
b)We are unable to comment on the ultimate realisability of investments
amounting to Rs 1110.33 Crore in Rainforest trading Limited and amount
advanced to Baytech Inc B VI of Rs 126.13 Crore in the absence of
audited financials for last two years of their ultimate subsidiary Esys
Technologies Pte Limited which is the substance of the said
investments/advances as referred in Note no. 14 (a) of Schedule Q.
c) We draw attention to:
1. Note no. 17 of Schedule Q wherein debtors amounting to Rs 451.97
crores which are outstanding for considerable period of time as on the
date of this report are considered good and recoverable.
ii. Note No 19 of Schedule Q regarding sales done during the year
with respect to which the bank guarantees amounting to Rs 253.89 crores
from its customers have been revoked subsequent to the close of the
year with regard to which no provision or adjustment has been made as
the same considered good and recoverable in the opinion of management.
We are unable to express an opinion on the ultimate realisability of
the said amounts.
6. Subject to the comments made in paragraph 5 above and the effect in
respect of which on the profit and loss account of the Company for the
period under consideration is not ascertainable, in our opinion and to
the best of our information and according to the explanations given to
us, the said accounts read together with the notes thereon and in
particular Note no. 9 of Schedule Q on business of demerged companies
being carried out in the overseas branches till the end of the year,
Note no. 16 of Schedule Q on confirmation of balances from parties,
Note no.21(b) of Schedule Q on valuation of plantations, give a true
and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India :-
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2008;
ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Nature of Due and Disputed Amount
Assessment year (Rs. in Crore)
Income Tax
1998-99 0.11
1999-00 0.86
2000-01 2.14
2003-04 3.21
2004-05 2.56
Forum where pending
The Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Chennai
The Commissioner of Income-
Tax, Appeals
-do-
The Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Chennai
The Commissioner of Income-
Tax, Appeals
10) Based on our audit procedures and according to the informations and
explanation given to us, we are of the opinion that the Company has
defaulted in repayment of dues to banks arising out from the invocation
of bank guarantee which as on the date of the balance sheet stood at
Rs.48.43 Crore
11) The company has no accumulated losses and has not incurred any cash
losses during the financial year covered by our audit or in the
immediately preceding financial year.
12) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, no loans and advances have been granted by the company on
the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
13) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/ mutual
benefit fund/ society. Therefore, clause 4(xiii) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 2003 is not applicable to the Company.
14) The Company has not dealt or traded in shares, securities,
debentures or other investments during the year. All securities and
other investments have been held by the Company in its own name except
in case of investments in certain foreign companies where shares are
held by its directors/nominees as referred to in Note no. 14(a) of
Schedule Q and Note no. 14(e) of Schedule Q of notes to accounts where
in the share certificate for the investments are not in the possession
of the Company.
15) As per information and explanations given to us, the company has
given guarantees to Banks or Financial Institutions for loans taken by
its wholly owned subsidiary Baytech Inc., BVI for investment in the
ultimate subsidiary Esys Technologies Pte Limited,Singapore in respect
of which we are informed that the same is not prejudicial to the
interest of the Company. The Company is of the further opinion that the
corporate guarantees given to parties other than subsidiaries are in
the ordinary course of business and hence are not prejudicial to the
interest of the Company.
16) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans taken from banks have been applied for the
purpose for which they were raised.
17) According to the information and explanations given to us, and on
overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we are of the
opinion that, no funds raised on a short- term basis, have been used
for long-term investments.
18) The Company has made preferential allotment of shares during the
year in pursuance of conversion of share warrants issued in the
previous year to the promoters and their relatives being the parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 in accordance with the price determined as per the
regulations prescribed by the Securities Exchange Board of India after
considering the write off as per the Scheme of Demerger sanctioned by
the Honourable High Court of Madras.
19) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not issued any secured debentures during
the period covered under our report. Accordingly provisions of clause
4(xix) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the Company.
20) The company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
21) Based upon the audit procedures performed and information and
explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by
the company has been noticed or reported during the course of our
audit.
For CHATURVEDI AND SHAH
Chartered Accountants
Amit Chaturvedi
Partner
Membership Number: 103141
Place : Mumbai
Date : 7th November, 2008
|
|
![]() | |
| Source : Religare Technova | |
![]() | |




Online










