1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Tata Global Beverages
Limited (the Company”) as at 31 March 2011, and the related profit and
Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto, which we have signed under reference to this report.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order 2004
(together the Order”), issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of ''The Companies Act, 1956''
of India (the ''Act'') and on the basis of such checks of the books and
records of the Company as we considered appropriate and according to
the information and explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specifed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of
our audit;
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c) The Balance Sheet, profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act;
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors,
as on 31 March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none
of the directors is disqualifed as on 31 March 2011 from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
Section 274 of the Act;
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements together
with the notes thereon and attached thereto give, in the prescribed
manner, the information required by the Act, and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31 March 2011; (ii) in the case of the profit and Loss
Account, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and (iii) in the
case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash fows for the year ended on
that date.
Annexure to Auditors'' Report
Referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditors'' Report of even date to the
members of Tata Global Beverages Limited (formerly Tata Tea Limited) on
the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2011
1. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation, of fixed
assets.
b) The fixed assets are physically verifed by the Management according
to a phased programme designed to cover all the items over a period of
three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the
programme, a portion of the fixed assets has been physically verifed by
the Management during the year and no material discrepancies between
the book records and the physical inventory have been noticed.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed of
by the Company during the year.
2. a) The inventory (excluding stocks with third parties) has been
physically verifed by the Management during the year. In respect of
inventory lying with third parties, these have been confirmed by
them. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.
b) In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the Management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the inventory records, in our
opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in
the books of account.
3. a) The Company has granted unsecured loans, to two companies
covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Act. The
maximum amount involved during the year and the year-end balance of
such loans aggregates to, Rs. 6,500 lakhs and Rs. 5,000 lakhs,
respectively.
b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
of such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
c) In respect of the aforesaid loans, the parties are repaying the
principal amounts as stipulated and are also regular in payment of
interest.
d) In respect of the aforesaid loans, there is no overdue amount more
than Rupees One Lakh.
e) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, frms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Act.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the Company, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across nor have been
informed of any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the
aforesaid internal control system.
5. a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to
in Section 301 of the Act have been entered in the register required
to be maintained under that section.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of Rupees Five Lakhs in respect of
any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act and the
Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no Order has been passed by the Company Law
Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any
Court or any other Tribunal on the Company in respect of the aforesaid
deposits.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company in respect of products where, pursuant to the Rules made by the
Central Government of India, the maintenance of cost records has been
prescribed under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the
Act, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts
and records have been made and maintained. We have not, however, made a
detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether
they are accurate or complete.
9. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, the Company
is generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues
including provident fund, investor education and protection fund,
employees'' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax,
service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other material
statutory dues as applicable with the appropriate authorities.
There are no outstanding dues in respect of the above items, which
are more than six months as at the balance sheet date.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of dues of
income-tax, entry tax, employee state insurance, sales-tax, value added
tax and cess as at 31 March 2011 which have not been deposited on
account of a dispute, are as follows:
Amount Period to
which the
Name of the s
tatute Nature of
dues (Rs. in
Lakhs) amount
relates Forum where the
dispute is pending
Income-tax Act
1961 Income Tax 205.90 2004-2005 Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals), Kochi
Income-tax Act
1961 Income Tax 0.73 2007-2008 Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals), Kolkata
Income-tax Act
1961 Income Tax 11.24 2007-2008
and Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals),Kochi
2008-2009
Income-tax Act
1961 Income Tax 3.49 2007-2008
and Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals),
Bangalore
2008-2009
Assam Entry
Tax Act, 2008 Entry Tax 93.45 2008-2009 High Court of Guwahati
West Bengal
Sales Tax Act,
1994 Sales Tax 1.76 1998-1999
and Sales Tax Tribunal,
West Bengal
2000-2001
West Bengal
Value Added
Tax Act, 2003 Value Added
Tax 119.97 2007-2008 Deputy Commissioner
of Commercial Taxes
Central Sal
es Tax 1.89 2007-2008 Deputy Commissioner
of Commercial Taxes
Kerala General
Sales Tax Act,
1963 Sales Tax 12.00 1998-1999 Sales Tax Tribunal,
Kerala
Sales Tax 43.74 1996-1997
to
2000-2001 Deputy Commissioner
and
2002-2003 (Appeals) of Commerc
ial Taxes , Kerala
Sales Tax 2.76 1994-1995
to
1996-1997 Assistant Commissioner
(Appeals) of Commercial
Taxes , Kerala
Central Sales
Tax Act, 1956 Sales Tax 12.14 1998-1999 Sales Tax Tribunal,
Kerala
Sales Tax 14.99 1990-2000,
2000-2001 Deputy Commissioner
and
2002-2003 (Appeals) of Commerc
ial Taxes , Kerala
Karnataka
Sales Tax
Act,1957 Sales Tax 441.00 1995-1996
to
1996-1997 Joint Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes,
Karnataka
Sales Tax 128.00 1997-1998 Supreme Court of India
Madhya Pradesh
Entry Tax Act,
1976 Entry Tax 203.14 2003-2004
and High Court of Madhya
Pradesh
2007-2008
Tamilnadu
General Sales
Tax Act,1959 Sales Tax 52.66 2001-2002
to
2006-2007 DCTO, Tamilnadu
Tamilnadu Panc
hayat Act,1994 Cess on
Land 4.97 2000-2001
to High Court of Madras
Revenue 2002-2003
Goa Value Added
Tax Act, 2005 Value Added
Tax 1.01 2006-2007 Assistant Commissioner
Employees'' State
Insurance Act,
1948 ESI 1.20 2009-2010 Employees Insurance
Court – cum –
Industrial Tribunal,
Hyderabad
10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 31 March 2011 and it
has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on that
date or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanation given to us, the Company has not defaulted
in repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank or debenture
holders as at the balance sheet date.
12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund/
nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ societies are not applicable to the Company.
14. In our opinion, the Company is not a dealer or trader in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the
Company, for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions
during the year, are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
16. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, on an overall basis, the term loans have been applied for
the purposes for which they were obtained.
17. On the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the
Company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long-term investment.
18. During the year, the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Act during the year.
19. The Company has created security or charge in respect of debentures
issued and outstanding at the year-end.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
21. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the Management.
For N M Raiji & Co For Lovelock & Lewes
Firm Registration No: 108296W Firm Registration No: 301056E
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
J M Gandhi Partha Mitra
Partner Partner
Membership Number : 37924 Membership Number : 50553
Mumbai, 24 May 2011 Mumbai, 24 May 2011
|