Tata Sponge Iron
BSE: 513010 | NSE: TATASPONGE | ISIN: INE674A01014 | Steel - Sponge Iron
- Directors Report
- Chairman's Speech
- Auditors Report
- Notes To Accounts
- Accounting Policy
- Finished Products
- Raw Materials
| Notes to Accounts | Year End : Mar '09 |
1. Contingent Liabilities
31.03.2009 31.03.2008
Rs. in lacs Rs. in lacs
Contingent Liabilities not provided for
a) Income tax 87.92
b) Bills Discounted - 568.31
c) Bank Guarantee 5,214.23 4,046.82
d) Letter of credit 57.44 25.00
2. Estimated amounts of contracts remaining to be executed on capital
account and not provided : Rs.482.50 lacs (As at 31.3.2008 Rs. 527.51
lacs ) [Net of advances Rs.Nil (As at 31.03.2008 Rs. 34.76 lacs)].
3. The Company had been allotted a Coal block along with two other
companies in 2006-07. The investment and the operation
of the mine would be done by the company as the leader of the group.
The company has not made any financial commitment till date, except
arranging for bank guarantee of Rs 3250.00 lacs as at 31.03.2009 (As at
31.03.2008 Rs.3,250.00 lacs ).
4. Sales Tax
a) The Company had filed a writ petition before the High Court of
Orissa for sales tax exemption for a period of two years w.e.f. 10th
June 1997 as a Pioneer Unit. The High Court initially ruled that the
Company should pay the sales tax under dispute pending disposal of the
writ petition. Accordingly, the Company paid Sales tax, which had not
been collected from customers, and amounts aggregating to Rs 573.73
lacs had been charged to the Profit & Loss Account during the years
1997-98 to 1999-2000.
The High,Court directed the Sales Tax Authorities to refund the amount
after ascertaining that the said refund shall not unjustly enrich the
Company. The Sales Tax Officer passed the order stating that the refund
shall unjustly enrich the Company against which the Company has filed a
writ petition in the High Court challenging the correctness of the
assessment and the same is pending. No credit has been taken in the
accounts, as the matter has not reached finality.
b) As per Industry Policy Resolution 1992 of Government of Orissa, the
company has to pay a minimum sales tax of Rs. 252.56 lacs before
availing exemption from sales tax on incremental sale of Sponge Iron
from Kiln 1 and 2. The company was paying the above amount untill the
rate of sales tax was reduced. With reduction in rate of sales tax, the
company contends that the above limit of Rs. 252.56 lacs has to
correspondingly reduce and accordingly is making reduced payment. The
company however has provided for the unpaid amount of Rs. 145.36 lacs
as on 31st March, 2009.
c) As per certificate no. 6948/lnd dated 26 May, 1999 issued by the
Director of Industries, Orissa, the Company is eligible for exemption
from payment of sales tax for a period of five years commencing
September 7,1998 on incremental sales tax arising on the sale of
products manufactured after installation of the 2nd Kiln subject to a
ceiling of 75 percent of additional capital investment in plant and
machinery.
The Companys appeal against restriction of the five year ceiling
period for sales tax exemption in respect of the expanded capacity has
since been decided in favour of the Company by the Supreme Court
upholding the judgement of High Court of Orissa . As per the judgement
the time period of five years mentioned in theeligibility
certificatewas ultra vires the Orissa States Industrial Policy
Resolution, 1992 and shall have no effect. Necessary amended
Eligibility Certificate is to be issued by the Director of Industries,
Orissa on reconsideration of the Companys application for
re-evaluation of its investment for expansion and determine afresh the
extent to which the Company is entitled to the sales tax incentive.
As the receipt of the revised Eligibility Certificate is procedural and
consequential the Company has written back a sum of Rs.450.64 lacs, of
sales tax provided up to 31.03.2007 during the previous year.
Accountants of India (ICAI), the opening liability was re estimated
bifurcating into short term and long term liability. While short term
liability was estimated at actual, the valuation for long term
liability was made on actuarial basis. Consequently, the excess
liability as on 1 st April, 2006 of Rs.217.44 lacs (net of deferred tax
Rs. 110.33 lacs) which had been adjusted with the General Reserve
during 2006-07 was reversed and an amount of Rs. 36.86 lacs being the
excess amount charged to profit and loss account during 2006-07 was
written back to the profit and loss account during 2007-08.
5. Based on and to the extent of information obtained from suppliers
regarding their status as Micro, Small or Medium enterprises under
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, there are no
amounts due to them as at the end of the year.
6. Disclosure as required under AS 29.
Provisions for Sales tax and Entry tax have been recognised in the
financial statements considering the following:
i) The company has a present obligation as a result of past event
ii) It is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits will be required to settle the obligation; and
iii) A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Religare Technova | |
![]() | |




Online










