We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of TAMIL NADU NEWSPRINT AND
PAPERS LIMITED, as at 31st March 2011, the Profit and Loss account and
also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 issued by
the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 of the said Order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company in so far as it appears from examination of
those books.
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(v) In respect of nominee directors appointed by State Government and
public financial institutions, the provisions of Section 274(l)(g) does
not apply. In respect of directors other than those specified above, we
report that, on the basis of written representations received from
those directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of
them is disqualified as on 31st March 2011 from being appointed as a
director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) As the Central Government is yet to notify Cess payable under
Section 441A, the reporting requirement under Section 227(3)(g) of the
Companies Act, 1956 does not arise.
(vii) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
(a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the State of Affairs of the
company as at 31st March 2011;
(b) In the case of Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the year
ended on that date; and
(c) In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF OUR
REPORT OF EVEN DATE,
i) (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of Fixed
Assets;
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at
reasonable intervals; no material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
(c) No substantial part of fixed assets have been disposed off during
the year.
ii) (a) Physical verification of inventory has been conducted at
reasonable intervals by the management;
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
iii) (a) The company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) The company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
companies, firms, or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for sale of goods and services.
During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing
failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.
v) As per the information and explanation given to us, there are no
contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 that needs to be entered into the register maintained under
the section.
vi) The company has not accepted any deposits from public during the
year. Hence the provisions of section 58A, 58AA or other relevant
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 are not applicable.
vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
viii) The Central Government has prescribed the maintenance of cost
records under Section 209(l)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we are
of the opinion that prima facie, the books of accounts prescribed under
the Cost Accounting Records (Paper) Rules, 1975, have been maintained
by the company and the proforma specified therein for the year are
under preparation. We have however not carried out a detailed
verification of such records.
ix) (a) The company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Income-Tax, Sales-Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
Customs Duty, Excise Duty, cess and any other statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations
given to us, no undisputed amounts payable were in arrears, for a
period more than six months from the date they become payable. The
Employees'' State Insurance Act does not apply to the company.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
are no dues of Sales Tax/Income Tax/Customs Duty/Wealth Tax/Service
Tax/Excise Duty/Cess which have not been deposited on account of any
dispute other than those given below:
Name of the
Statute Nature of Period to
which Amount Forum where the
Dues the amount
pertains (Rs.Lakhs) dispute is
pending
Central Excise
Act, 1944 Excise duty
exemption 1997-1998, 4.25 Tribunal, Chennai
1998-1999
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Input credit
reversal 1997-98,
1998-99 50.17 High Court,
Chennai.
1999-2000,
2000-01
2001-02
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2003-04,
2004-05, 1093.07 Tribunal,Chennai.
2006-07,
2007-08
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Input service
credit 2005-06,
2006-07 17.50 Tribunal,Chennai.
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Input service
credit 2006-07,
2007-08 30.43 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2006-07,
2007-08 8257.53 Tribunal,Chennai.
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Input service
credit 2007-08,
2008-09 768.44 Tribunal,Chennai.
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2008-09,
2009-10 20.43 Tribunal,Chennai.
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2008-09 77.89 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2009-10 268.72 Tribunal,Chennai.
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Input service
credit 2009-10,
2010-11 6.87 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2010-11 2.57 Tribunal,Chennai.
Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004 Capital goods
credit 2010-11 3.08 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Customs Act,
1962 Custom Duty 1991-92 44.34 Commissioner
Customs Act,
1962 Custom Duty 1997-98 54.81 Commissioner
Customs Act,
1962 Custom Duty 1999-00 126.74 Commissioner
Income-tax Act,
1961 Income-tax AY 2002-03 60.69 Assessing Officer
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY 1996-97 to 244.47 Assessing Officer
2000-01 &
2003-04
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY -1996-97 to 283.58 Commissioner
(Appeals)
2000-01 &
2003-04
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY 2003-04 72.29 High Court,
Chennai
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY 2004-05 56.46 Tribunal,Chennai
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY 2005-06 137.96 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY 2006-07 5.97 Tribunal,Chennai
Income-tax
Act, 1961 Income-tax AY 2008-09 9.09 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Wealth Tax
Act, 1957 Wealth Tax AY 1997-98, 19.46 Assessing Officer
1998-99,
1999-00,
2001-02,
2002-03,
2003-04
x) The Company does not have accumulated losses as at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the financial
year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.
xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any
financial institution, bank or debenture holders.
xii) The Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
Hence the question of maintenance of documents and records does not
arise.
xiii) The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund /
society. Hence this clause is not applicable to the company.
xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Hence this clause
is not applicable to the company.
xv) The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others
from banks or financial institutions based on the records produced to
us.
xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not utilized the term loan to the extent of Rs.37.58 crores
for the purpose for which it has been obtained.
xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us,
during the year the Company has not made preferential allotment of
shares to parties and companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act.
xix) As per the information and explanation given to us, the company
has not issued any debentures during the year. However, in respect of
debentures outstanding at the end of the year, necessary security or
charge has been created.
xx) The company has not raised any money through public issue. Hence
the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report)
Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For P.B. Vijayaraghavan & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No. 004721S
P.B. Srinivasan
Place - Chennai Partner
Date - 27th May 2011 Membership No. 203774
|