1.  We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Syngenta India
 Limited (the Company) as at March 31, 2010 and also the Profit and
 Loss account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that
 date annexed thereto.  These financial statements are the
 responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
 express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
 
 2.  We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
 generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
 perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
 financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
 includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
 and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
 assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
 by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
 presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
 for our opinion.
 
 3.  As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
 amended) (the order) issued by the Central Government of India in
 terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we
 enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
 paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
 
 4.  Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
 report that:
 
 i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
 best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
 audit;
 
 ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
 been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
 those books;
 
 iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
 dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
 
 iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
 flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
 standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
 Companies Act, 1956.
 
 v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
 directors, as on March 31, 2010, and taken on record by the Board of
 Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
 March 31, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
 (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
 the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
 required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
 a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
 generally accepted in India;
 
 a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
 Company as at March 31, 2010;
 
 b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
 year ended on that date; and
 
 c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
 ended on that date.
 
 
 Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
 
 
 Re: Syngenta India Limited (the Company)
 
 (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
 particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
 assets.
 
 (b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the
 management during the year but there is a regular programme of
 verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
 size of the Company and the nature of its assets. As informed, no
 material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
 
 (c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
 
 (ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
 inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
 
 (b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
 the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
 the Company and the nature of its business.
 
 (c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
 material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
 
 (iii) (a) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured
 or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the
 register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and
 thus the provisions of the clauses (iii) (b) to (iii) (d) of the order
 are not applicable.
 
 (b) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
 unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
 register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and
 thus the provisions of clauses (iii) (f) and (iii) (g) of the order are
 not applicable.
 
 (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate 
 with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the 
 purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and 
 services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been 
 noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas. During 
 the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to 
 correct major weakness in internal control system of the company.
 
 (v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
 management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
 arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Act that need to be
 entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so
 entered.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
 arrangements exceeding value of Rupees five lakhs have been entered
 into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having
 regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
 
 (vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
 
 (vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
 commensurate with the size and nature of its business. 
 
 (viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
 Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the 
 maintenance of cost records under section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies 
 Act, 1956, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed 
 accounts and records have been made and maintained.
 
 (ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
 education and protection fund, or employees state insurance,
 income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
 duty, cess have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
 authorities though there has been delays in large number of cases.
 
 Further, since the Central Governent has till date not prescribed the
 amount of cess payable under section 441 A of the Companies Act, 1956,
 we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of
 the company in depositing the same.
 
 (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
 undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
 education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
 wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
 other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for
 a period of more than six months from the date they became payable
 
 (c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
 excise duty and central sales tax on account of any dispute, are as
 follow.
 
 Name of the           Nature of Dues               Amount
 
 Statute                                             (Rs)
 
 Central Excise      Procedural delays in           499,877
 
 Act, 1944            Dealers Invoice
 
 Central Excise      Reversal of credit on        7,689,570
 
 Act, 1944       exempted product steam sold
 
 Central Sales       Sales tax Demand for not     1,134,000 
 
 Tax Act           submitting F Form and C Form
 
 Central Sales       Sales tax Demand for not     9,073,455 
 Tax Act           submitting F Form and C Form
 
 Central Sales       Sales tax Demand for not     2,917,597 
 Tax Act           submitting F Form and C Form
 
 Central Sales       Sales tax Demand for not   119,534,192 
 Tax Act           submitting F Form and C Form
 
 Central Sales       Sales tax Demand for not    33,755,640 
 Tax Act           submitting F Form and C Form
 
 Name of the          Period to         Forum where dispute is
  Statute             which the                pending
                     amount relates
 
 Central Excise            1994         Commissioner of Central
 Act,1944                                       Excise
 
 Central Excise           2009-10       Commissioner of Central
 Act,1944                                       Excise
 
 Central Sales            2004-05             Commissioner
 Tax Act                                       (Appeals)
 
 Central Sales            2005-06             Commissioner
 Tax Act,                                      (Appeals)
 
 Central Sales            2002-03         Joint Commissioner of
 Tax Act,                               Commercial Taxes Appeals
 
 Central Sales            2005-06        Deputy Commissioner of
 Tax Act,                               Commercial Taxes Appeals
 
 Central Sales            2006-07         Joint Commissioner of
 Tax Act,                               Commercial Taxes Appeals
 
 (x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the year and it
 has not incurred cash losses in the current year and immediately preceding 
 financial year.
 
 (xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
 explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the 
 Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. The company does 
 not have any borrowings from financial institutions or by way of debentures.
 
 (xii) Based on our examination of documents and records, we are of the
 opinion that the Company has maintained adequate records where the Company 
 has granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of 
 shares, debentures and other securities.
 
 (xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
 mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions
 of clause 4(xiii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.
 
 (xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
 shares, securities, debentures and other investments.
 
 Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the order are not
 applicable to the Company.
 
 (xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
 Company has not given any guarantee for
 
 loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions.
 
 (xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
 year.
 
 (xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
 an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report 
 that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term 
 investment.
 
 (xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
 to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
 section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
 year.
 
 (xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
 the year.
 
 (xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
 reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per 
 the information and explanations given by the management, we report that 
 no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the 
 course of our audit.
 
 
 For S.R. Batliboi & Co.
 
 Firm Registration No. 301003E 
 
 Chartered Accountants
 
 
 per Ravi Bansal
 
 Partner
 
 Membership No.: 49365
 
 
 Place : Mumbai 
 
 Date: July 30, 2010