1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SURYA
ROSHNI LIMITED as at 31st March, 2011 the related Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company''s Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our Audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Sub Section (4A)
of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 and on the basis of such
checks as we considered appropriate and according to the information
and explanations given to us, we enclose in the Annexure hereto a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
order to the extent applicable.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(I) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
(iii) The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report Comply with the
mandatory Accounting Standards referred in Sub Section (3C) of Section
211 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 31st March, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March,
2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of
sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements read
together with the Significant Accounting Policies and other notes
thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the
manner so required, and present a true and fair view, in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :
a) in so far as it relates to Balance Sheet, of the State of affairs of
the Company as at 31st March, 2011;
b) in so far as it relates to Profit and Loss Account, of Profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date ; and
c) in so far as it relates to the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash
Flows for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT
(Year ended 31-3-2011)
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
b) The Company has a programme of physical verification on a rotational
basis, which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size
of the Company and the nature of its business Accordingly, certain
fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during the
year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
2. In respect of its inventories :
a) The Management has conducted physical verification of inventory at
reasonable intervals during the year.
b) The procedures of physical verification of in ventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
3. In respect of loans, secured or unsecured, granted or taken by the
Company to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956:
a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
Companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
b) Since the Company has not granted any loans, the Clause (b), (c),
(d) relating to the rate of interest, receipt of Principal amount,
overdue amount does not apply.
c) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
Companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
d) Since the Company has not taken any loans, the Clause relating to
the rate of interest, payment of Principal amount, overdue amount does
not apply.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control commensurate with the
size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of
inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During
the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to
correct major weaknesses in internal controls system of the Company.
5. In respect of transactions covered under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956:
a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Act that need to be
entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so
entered.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements exceeding the value of Rupees Five lakhs have been entered
into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having
regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Section
58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard
to the deposits accepted from the public. Since theCompany has not
defaulted in repayments of deposits, compliance of Section 58AA. No
order has been passed by the Company Law Board, National Company Law
Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India.
7. In our opinion, the internal audit system of the Company is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts relating to
materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the Company
Pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of Cost Records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion, that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have
not made a detailed examination of the records.
9. In respect of statutory dues :
I) the company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state
insurance, Income Tax, Sales/VAT Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom
Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to
it.
ii) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Wealth Tax,
Sales/VAT Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrears as at
31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable.
iii) The disputed statutory dues aggregating to Rs.2,83,16,041/- that
have not been deposited on account of matters pending before
appropriate authorities are as under:
Sl. Name of Nature of. Forum where Amount in
No. the Statue Dues dispute is (Rs.)
pending
1. Central Excise Duty CESTAT 1,33,93,777
Excise
Act, 1944
2. Employees Employees High Court 53,85,264
State State Insurance
Insurance Calculation
Act, 1966
3. UPSEB UPSEB Acts High Court 41,27,000
4. Sales Taxes Upto 30,42,000
Tax/VAT Commissioner
Acts Level
High Court 23,68,000
Total 2,83,16,041
10. The Company has no accumulated losses and has not incurred any
cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit or in the
immediately preceding financial year.
11. Based on our audit procedures and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the Company has
not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions, banks or
debenture holders.
12. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no loans and advances have been granted by the Company on
the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
investments.
13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/ society. Therefore, clause 4(xiii) of the Companies
(Auditor''s Report) Order 2003 is not applicable to the Company.
14. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
Shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
Provisions of Clause 4 (xiv) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the Company
15. The Company has given guarantees to the extent of Rs.135 crores to
the Bank(s) on account of Term Loans taken by the Subsidiary Company in
pursuant to resolution under section 372A of the Companies Act, 1956.
16. In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purposes
for which they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term
investments. No long term funds have been used to finance short term
assets except permanent working capital.
18. The Company has outstanding 45,70,000 Optionally Convertible
Equity Warrants (Series I) as on 31st March,2010. The Company has
further issued the Preferential allotment of 1,14,30,000 Optionally
Convertible Equity Warrants (Series II) to Promoters Group at a price
of Rs.83/- which includes a premium of Rs.73/- per share and 54,75,000
Optionally Convertible Equity Warrants (Series III) to Promoters Group
at a price of Rs.111/- which includes a premium of Rs.101/- per share
calculated on the relevant date, in accordance with the SEBI (Issues of
Capital & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 and furthermore
45,70,000 outstanding Optionally Convertible Equity Warrants (Series I)
and 1,14,30,000 Warrants (Series II) were converted into Equity Shares
of Rs.10/- each fully paid and entire 54,75,000 Optionally Convertible
Equity Warrants (Series III) are still outstanding for conversion as on
date of Balance Sheet.
19. The Company has no debentures as at 31st March, 2011.
20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during
the year.
21. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported
during the year, that causes the financial statements to be materially
misstated.
For Sastry K. Anandam & Co.
Chartered Accountants
(Firm Registration No. 000179N)
(C.A. ANANDA SASTRY K.)
PARTNER F.C.A.
Membership No. 9980
Place : New Delhi
Date : 5th May, 2011
|