We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s. Sundaram-Clayton
 Limited, Chennai - 600 006 as at 31st March 2011 and the Profit and
 Loss Account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto and the
 Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date. These financial
 statements are the responsibility of the Company''s management. Our
 responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
 based on our audit.
 
 1.  We have conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
 generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
 perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
 financial statements are free from any material misstatement.  An audit
 includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
 and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
 assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
 by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
 financial statements.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
 basis for our opinion.
 
 2.  As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 and
 amended by the Companies (Auditor''s report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
 issued by the Central Government in terms of sub-section (4A) of
 Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
 statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
 Order.
 
 3.  Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we state
 that- (i) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which
 
 to the best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose
 of our audit.
 
 (ii) in our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have
 been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of such
 books.
 
 (iii) the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
 Statement, dealt with by this report, are in agreement with the books
 of accounts.
 
 (iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and the
 Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
 Accounting Standards, referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of
 the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (v) on the basis of written representations received from the Directors
 of the Company, as on 31st March 2011 and taken on record by the Board
 of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified from
 being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1)
 of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the said date.
 
 (vi) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
 the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
 notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,
 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity
 with the accounting principles generally accepted in India.
 
 a.  in so far as it relates to the Balance Sheet, of the state of
 affairs of the Company as at 31st March 2011;
 
 b.  in so far as it relates to the Profit and Loss Account, of the
 profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and
 
 c.  in so far as it relates to the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash
 flows for the year ended on that date.
 
 Annexure referred to in our report of even date of the accounts for the
 year ended 31st March 2011
 
 (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
 particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
 assets.
 
 (b) Fixed assets are verified physically by the management at
 reasonable intervals. In our opinion, the interval is reasonable having
 regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No
 material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
 
 (c) The assets disposed off during the year are not substantial and
 therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.
 
 (ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified at reasonable
 intervals during the year by the management. In our opinion, the
 frequency of such verification is adequate. In respect of inventory
 with third parties, which have not been physically verified, there is a
 process of obtaining confirmation from such parties.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the procedures for physical verification of inventory
 followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
 the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
 
 (c) In our opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of
 inventory. The discrepancies between the physical stocks and the books
 were not material and have been properly dealt with in the books of
 account.
 
 (iii) (a) During the year, the Company has granted loans to its wholly
 owned subsidiary, viz., Anusha Investments Limited, Chennai amounting
 to Rs.2.90 crores (Balance at the year end - Nil).  Apart from the
 above, the Company has not granted any loan to companies, firms or
 other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
 the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
 on which such loans and advances are made are not prima facie
 prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
 
 (c) The recovery of principal amount and interest thereon were in
 accordance with the terms of loan.
 
 (d) As on the date of Balance Sheet, the said company has fully repaid
 the loan availed by it.
 
 (e) During the year, the Company has not taken any loan, secured or
 unsecured, from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
 register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 However, the Company has repaid in full a loan of Rs.5,000 lakhs
 availed during last financial year.
 
 (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
 
 commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
 business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the
 sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no minor or
 major continuing failure has been noticed in the internal control
 system.
 
 (v) (a) Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to
 the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of
 the opinion that the contracts or arrangements that need to be entered
 in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
 have been properly entered in the said register.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the transactions entered in the register maintained under
 Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value by
 rupees five lakhs in respect of each party during the year, have been
 made at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing
 market prices at the relevant time.
 
 (vi) The Company has not accepted any deposit from the public.
 
 (vii) The Company has an Internal Audit System which, in our opinion,
 is commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
 
 (viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
 Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government under
 Section 209 (1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for maintenance of cost
 records and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed
 accounts and records have been made and maintained.
 
 (ix) (a) According to the records provided to us, the Company is
 regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident
 Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Investors Education and Protection
 Fund, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Customs duty, Excise duty,
 Service tax and Cess and other statutory dues with the appropriate
 authorities. However, certain marginally delayed remittances were
 noticed in respect of few payments dealt with herein. The die casting
 divisions at Belagondapalli near Hosur and Mahindra World City,
 Kancheepuram District are not covered under the Employees'' State
 Insurance Act, 1948.
 
 (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
 undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Sales
 Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Service tax and Cess were in arrears,
 as at 31st March 2011 for a period of more than six months from the
 date they became payable.
 
 (c) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
 following are the details of the disputed dues, that were not deposited
 with the concerned.
 
 
 
 Nameof the       Nature of         Amount      Forum where
 statute          dues              (Rs. in 
                                    lakhs)      dispute is 
                                                pending
 
 Central Excise 
 Act,             Interest on     (a)   5.97    The Hon’ble High 
 1944             Excise duty                   Court of Judicature at
                                                Madras
 
                  Excise duty     (b) 673.22    Commissioner of Central
                                                Excise, Chennai
 
 Total                                679.19
 
 Customs Act,1962 Customs duty        206.00    Joint Director General
                                                of Foreign Trade, 
                                                New Delhi
 
 Wealth Tax Act,  Wealth tax           14.61    Commissioner of
 1957                                           Income tax (Appeals),
                                                Chennai
 
 Finance Act, 
 1994             Service tax     (a)  44.30    Central Excise and
                                                Service Tax Appellate
                                                Tribunal, Chennai
 
                                  (b)  16.49    Commissioner
                                                (Appeals), Chennai
 
                                  (c) 107.38    Commissioner of
                                                Service tax, Chennai
 
                                  (d)  91.94    Additional
                                                Commissioner of Service
                                                tax, Chennai
 
                                  (e)  19.61    Joint Commissioner of
                                                Service tax, Chennai
 
                                  (f)   0.21    Asst. Commissioner of
                                                Service tax, Chennai
 
 Total                                279.93
 
 Tamilnadu Town   Fee payable to       96.92    The Hon’ble High
 and Country      CMDA /                        Court of Judicature at
 Planning         Municipal                     Madras
 Act, 1971        Authorities
 
 (x) The Company neither has accumulated losses as at the end of the
 financial year nor has incurred cash losses during the financial year
 and in the immediately preceding year.
 
 (xi) Based on our verification and according to the information and
 explanations given by the management, the Company has not defaulted in
 repayment of dues to its banks.
 
 (xii) Based on our examination and according to the information and
 explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and
 advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares,
 debentures and other securities.
 
 (xiii) The Company is not a chit / nidhi / mutual benefit fund /
 society and as such this clause of the Order is not applicable.
 
 (xiv) The Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
 debentures and other investments other than in mutual fund investments.
 Proper records have been maintained in respect of these transactions
 and contracts and timely entries have been made therein. The
 investments have been held by the Company in its own name except to the
 extent of exemption granted under Section 49 of the Companies Act, 1956
 in respect of shares held in subsidiary companies through the nominees.
 
 (xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions of guarantees given by
 the Company for loans taken by others are not prejudicial to the
 interests of the Company.
 
 (xvi) The term loan availed by the Company were utilized for the
 purpose for which the loan was obtained.
 
 (xvii) On the basis of our examination, the Company has not used funds
 raised on short term basis for long term investments.
 
 (xviii) During the year the Company has not allotted any shares on
 preferential basis to parties and companies covered in the register
 maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (xix) During the year, the Company has not issued any secured
 debentures.
 
 (xx) During the year, the Company has not raised any money by public
 issue.
 
 (xxi) Based on the audit procedures adopted and information and
 explanations given to us by the management, no fraud on or by the
 Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.
 
                                             For SUNDARAM & SRINIVASAN
                                                 Chartered Accountants
                                                 Firm Regn. No. 004207S
 
                                                    M. BALASUBRAMANIYAM
 Chennai                                                        Partner
 
 12th August 2011                                  Membership No. F7945