We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA
LIMITED, as on 31st March 2011, the Profit & Loss Account and the Cash
Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto, in which are incorporated the accounts of Plants, Units,
Branches and other Offices audited by the Branch Auditors in accordance
with the letter of appointment of Comptroller & Auditor General of
India. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
(hereinafter referred to as the Order) issued by the Government of
India in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we
enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 & 5 of the said Order.
4. Since the matter regarding provision of pension under
superannuation benefits for non executives remains undecided and the
amount also not ascertained, we are therefore unable to express our
opinion on the same and the effect on the accounts, if any (Refer Note
No. 5.8).
5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i). We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
ii). In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of the
books, and proper returns adequate for the purpose of our audit have
been received from the plants/ units/ branches/other units not visited
by us. The branch auditors'' reports have been forwarded to us and have
been appropriately dealt with.
iii). The Balance Sheet, the Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account and with the audited returns from the branches.
iv). In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit & Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub- section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
The position has been adequately explained in Note No. 5.8 of the
Rs.Schedule 3: Accounting policies and notes to accounts'' forming part of
the accounts.
v). In terms of Government of India, Department of Company Affairs
Notification No. GSR 829(E) dated 21st October, 2003, Government
companies are exempt from the applicability of provisions of Section
274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts subject to our observation
given in point no.4 above and read with significant accounting policies
and notes on accounts appearing in Schedule 3, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
i) in case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as
on 31st March 2011;
ii) in case of Profit & Loss Account, of the Profit of the Company for
the year ended on that date; and
iii) in case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
1. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing in most cases,
full particulars including quantitative details and situation of its
fixed assets.
b) The fixed assets of the Company have been physically verified by the
management at reasonable intervals in a phased manner so as to
generally cover all the assets once in three years. As informed to us,
no material discrepancies have been noticed on such verification
wherever reconciliation has been carried out. In few cases of fixed
assets, verified but not reconciled, the discrepancies are yet to be
ascertained.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is no substantial disposal of fixed assets during
the year.
Physical verification of fixed assets and its reconciliation with the
books is a continuous process.
2. a) The inventories have been physically verified by the management
with reasonable frequency during the year. In certain cases, the
stocks have been verified on the basis of visual survey/estimates.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures for physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are generally reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its
inventory. The discrepancies between physical stocks and book records
arising out of physical verification, which were not material, have
been dealt with in the books of account.
3. According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not granted or taken any secured or unsecured loans, to or from
companies, firms, or other parties covered in the register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, clauses
(iii)(a) to (iii)(g) of paragraph 4 are not applicable.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major failures in the internal control system.
5. a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that there are no contract or arrangement of the
Company, referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, which
requires to be entered in the register required to be maintained under
that section. b) According to the information and explanations given
to us, there are no transactions of purchase of goods and materials and
sale of goods, materials and services made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act 1956, exceeding the value of Rs.5,00,000 in respect of
any party.
6. The Company has not accepted any public deposits during the year.
In respect of public deposits accepted in earlier years, there are no
unmatured outstanding deposits.
7. In our opinion, the Company''s internal audit system is generally
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the records maintained by the Company
pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained in respect of the
applicable products. We have not, however, made a detailed examination
of the records with a view to determine whether these are accurate and
complete.
9. According to the information and explanations given to us in
respect of statutory and other dues:
a) The Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investors Education and
Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax,
Wealth Tax, Service tax, Custom duty, Excise duty, Cess and other
statutory dues, with appropriate authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no undisputed statutory dues outstanding for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable, as per books of accounts as
at 31st March, 2011.
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
disputed statutory dues, which have not been deposited as on 31st
March, 2011, as given herein below:
Statute Nature of Dues Amount Forum where
(Rs. in crore) disputes are pending
Sales Tax Demand by 113.81 High Courts
Appellate 531.56 Sales Tax Tribunals
Authorities 195.07 Sales Tax Depar
-tments
840.44
Central Excise Excise duty 1016.58 Supreme Court
Act, 1944 17.54 High Courts
675.61 CESTAT
274.04 Department of
Excise
0.32 Settlement
Commission
1984.09
Income Tax
Act, 1961 TDS on perks 161.74 High Courts
Income Tax 256.56 Department of
Income
418.30
Other Statutes Other statutory dues 1272.74 Supreme Court
(including cess) 434.68 High Courts
42.25 Lower Courts
42.04 Concerned
Department
1791.71
TOTAL 5034.54
10. There are no accumulated losses of the Company as at the end of
the year. The Company has not incurred cash losses during the financial
year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution or bank or bond holder.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi / mutual benefit fund /
society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Order, are
not applicable to the Company.
14. The Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause
4(xiv) of the Order, are not applicable to the Company.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the Company for loans
taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not
prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
16. To the best of our knowledge and belief, and according to the
information and explanations given to us, in our opinion, the term
loans availed by the Company were, prima facie, applied by the Company
during the year for the purpose for which the loans were obtained other
than temporary deployment pending application.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment of the Company.
18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us and
records examined by us, charges have been created in respect of secured
bonds issued.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, we report that no fraud on or
by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year except for
misappropriation of Rs. 1 crore by an employee of the Company. We have
been informed that the amount has been subsequently recovered in May,
2011 and employee has been placed under suspension.
The matter has been reported to Central Bureau of nvestigation and the
investigation is going on. First nformation Report also has been lodged
with Police Proceedings by the management in the case are also in
progress. As the Company has recovered the entire amount in May, 2011,
there is no effect on the financial results of the Company for the
year.
For T.R. Chadha & Co. For Tej Raj & Pal For S.K. Mittal & Co.
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No.: Firm Registration No.: Firm Registration No.:
006711N 304124E 001135N
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
(Ajesh Tuli) (B. Gangaraju) (S.K. Mittal)
Partner Partner Partner
(M. No. 86424) (M. No. 7605) (M. No. 8506)
Place : New Delhi
Dated : 24th June, 2011
For and on behalf of the
Board of Directors
Sd/-
(C. S. Verma)
Chairman
Place: New Delhi
Dated: 29th July, 2011
|