1. We have audited the attached Balance sheet of Smartlink Network
Systems Limited (“the Company”), as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and
Loss Account and the Cash-Flow Statement for the year ended on that
date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s Management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates
made by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003, (CARO)
issued by the Central Government in terms of section 227 (4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report as follows:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the Balance sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash-Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
accounting;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash-Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in section 211(3C) of the Companies
Act, 1956;
(e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read with the
significant accounting policies and notes thereon, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
i.) in the case of the Balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
ii.) in the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
iii.) in the case of the Cash-flow statement, of the cash-flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
5. On the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on 31st March, 2011 taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report
Re: Smartlink Network Systems Limited
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
i.) Having regard to the nature of the Company’s business/activities,
clauses (xiii) and (xiv) of paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditor’s
Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable.
ii.) In respect of its fixed assets:
(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;
(b) A major portion of fixed assets have been physically verified by
the Management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification of fixed assets by the management is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.
Material discrepancies noticed on such verification have been properly
dealt with in the books of accounts;
(c) The fixed assets disposed off/written off during the year, in our
opinion, do not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of
the Company and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the
going concern status of the Company.
iii.) In respect of its inventory:
(a) The inventories have been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable;
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business;
(c) The Company has maintained proper records of inventories and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
iv) The Company has not granted or taken any loans, to/from companies,
firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Consequently, the requirements of
clauses (iii) (a) to (iii) (g) of paragraph 4 of the Order are not
applicable to the Company.
v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for sale of goods/services.
During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing
failure, to correct major weakness in such internal control system.
vi.) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the Register
maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, to
the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information
and explanations given to us:
(a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to Section
301 that needed to be entered in the Register maintained under the said
Section have been so entered.
(b) Where each of such transaction is in excess of Rs. 5 lakhs in
respect of any party, the transactions have been made at prices which
are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market
prices at the relevant time.
vii.) The Company has not accepted deposits from the public.
viii.) In our opinion, the internal audit function carried out during
the year, by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the
management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and the
nature of its business.
ix.) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Order made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 with regard to the networking products of the Company and are
of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records
have generally been made and maintained/ are under preparation. We
have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records with a
view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To the best
of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance
of cost records for any other product of the Company.
x.) According to the information and explanations given to us in
respect of statutory dues:
(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees’ State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues
applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.
(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax,
Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory
dues in arrears as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
(c) Details of dues of Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess which have not been deposited as on
31st March, 2011 on account of disputes are given below:
Name of the Nature of dues Forum where dispute
Statute is pending
Customs Act, Customs Duty Customs, Excise and Service
1962 Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
Customs Act, Penalty Customs, Excise and Service Tax
1962 (Customs Duty) Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
Central Excise Duty Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Excise Act, Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
1944
Central Penalty Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Excise Act, (Excise Duty) Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
1944
Central Excise Duty Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Excise Act, Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
1944
Central Penalty Customs, Excise and Service
Excise Act, (Excise Duty) Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
1944
Central Penalty Customs, Excise and Service
Excise Act, (Excise Duty) Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
1944
Central Penalty Customs, Excise and Service Tax
Excise Act, (Excise Duty) Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
Name of the Financial Year Amount (Rs.)
Statute to which amount
relates
Customs Act 2004-2005 1,514,221/-
1962 (Net of Rs. 900,000/-
of pre-deposit)
Customs Act 2004-2005 2,414,221
1962
Central 2004-2005 3,226,176/-
Excise Act (Net of Rs. 1,400,000/-
1944 of pre-deposit)
Central 2004-2005 4,626,176/-
Excise Act
1944
Central 2001-2002,
Excise Act 2002-2003 24,089,496/-
1944 2003-2004,
2004-2005 (Net of Rs. 10,000,000/-
of pre-deposit)
Central 2001-2002,
Excise Act 2002-2003 34,089,496/-
1944 2003-2004,
2004-2005
Central 2004-2005 100,000/-
Excise Act
1944
Central 2004-2005 702,041/-
Excise Act
1944
xi.) The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses during the year under
report and in the immediately preceding financial year.
xii.) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.
xiii.) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted any loans and advances on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
xiv.) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
xv.) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not obtained any term loan during the year
and hence the question of commenting on application thereof does not
arise.
xvi.) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, funds
raised on short term basis have not been used during the year for long
term investment
xvii.) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties and
companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
xviii.) The Company has not issued debentures; hence the question of
creating security or charge in respect thereof does not arise.
xix.) During the year, the Company has not raised money by public
issue.
xx.) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the
Company, was noticed or reported during the year.
For Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Chartered Accountants
Registration no. 117366W
A. B. Jani
Partner
Membership no. 46488
Mumbai
Dated : 23rd May, 2011
|