1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Shoppers Stop Limited
(the Company) as at 31 March 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date,
both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates
made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227(4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report as follows:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance
with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(e) Without qualifying our opinion, attention is invited to Note 24 of
the Financial Statements regarding non-provision of service tax for the
period 1 June 2007 to 31 March 2010 on renting of immoveable properties
given for commercial use, aggregating Rs. 1,619 lacs. The retrospective
levy of service tax has, inter-alia, been challenged by the Company in
various High Courts and an interim stay has been granted by the various
High Courts from the recovery of the said service tax. The matter is
contingent upon the final outcome of the litigation.
(f) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31 March 2011;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
5. On the basis of written representations received from the Directors
as on 31 March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none
of the Directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2011 from being
appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditors Report (Referred to in paragraph (3) thereof)
In our opinion and according to the information and explanation given
to us, the nature of the Companys business/activities during the year
are such that clauses (vi), (viii), (x), (xii), (xiii), (xiv) and (xix)
of Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003, are not applicable to the
Company. In respect of the other clauses, we report as under:
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.
(b) Some of the fixed assets were physically verified during the year
by the Management in accordance with a programme of verification,
which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the
fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(c) During the year, in our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets
has not been disposed off by the Company.
2. In respect of its inventory:
(a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during
the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the Management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its
inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification.
3. The company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. In respect of loans,
secured or unsecured, granted by the Company to companies, firms or
other parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956, according to the information and explanations
given to us:
(a) The company has granted unsecured loans to one party during the
year. At the year-end, the outstanding balance of such loans aggregated
Rs. 12,565.54 lacs and the maximum amount involved during the year was
Rs. 13,685.45 lacs.
(b) The rate of interest and other terms and conditions of such loans
are, in our opinion, prima facie not prejudicial to the interests of
the Company.
(c) The payment of principal and interest in respect of such loans are
as per stipulations.
(d) There are no overdue amounts of principal or interest as at 31
March 2011.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness in the aforesaid internal control systems.
5. In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the Register
maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, to
the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information
and explanations given to us:
(a) The particulars of the contracts or arrangements referred to in
Section 301 that needed to be entered in the Register maintained under
the said Section have been so entered.
(b) Where each of such transactions is in excess of Rs. 5 lacs in
respect of any party, we are informed that the nature of transaction is
such that there are no comparative prevailing market prices.
6. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the
year by firms of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have
been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
7. According to the information and explanations given to us, and the
records of the Company examined by us in respect of statutory dues:
(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees State Insurance, Income-Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues
applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.
(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-Tax,
Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and
other material statutory dues in arrears as at 31 March 2011 for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) There are no disputed dues relating to Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Excise Duty and Cess which have not been deposited with
the relevant authorities as at 31st March, 2011.
The details of dues of Income-Tax and Customs Duty which have not been
deposited as on 31 March 2011 on account of any disputes are given
below:
Name of the
Statute Nature of dues Period to which the Forum where
amount relates dispute is
pending
The Income-
tax Act, Income-tax FY 2007-08 Dy. Commissioner
1961 (Appeals)
FY 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner
(Appeals)
The Customs
Act, 1962 Custom duty FY 2007-08 Commissioner
(Appeals)
Name of the Statue Amount under dispute not yet deposited
(Rs. in Lacs)
The Income- tax Act, 74.96
1961
74.40
The Custom Act, 1962 17.09
8. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to
banks.
9. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the
Company for loans taken by its joint venture companies from banks are
not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the Company.
10. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans obtained have been applied for the purposes
for which they were obtained.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet, we
report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been used during
the year for long-term investment.
12. During the year, the Company has made preferential allotment of
shares against optionally convertible warrants issued in the previous
year to Companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956. The price at which these shares have been
allotted, has been determined as per the Securities and Exchange Board
of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations,
2009, which in our opinion, is not prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
13. We have verified the end use of moneys raised by public issue viz.
qualified institutional placement and the same has been disclosed in
Note 37(ii) of the financial statements.
14. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no significant
fraud on the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For Deloitte Haskins & Sells,
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 117366W)
Shyamak R. Tata
Partner
Membership No. 38320
Place: Mumbai
Date : 29 April, 2011
|