1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of SADBHAV ENGINEERING
LIMITED, as at 31st March, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account
and also the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the management of the company. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material mis-statement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, of evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India it terms of Sub-section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
Audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by law, have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examination of the
books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of accounts;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act,1956;
(e) On the basis of written representation received from the Directors
as on 20th April, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st
March,2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of
Sub-section(1) of section 274 of the companies Act, 1956;
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
Significant Accounting Policies and Notes thereon give the information
as required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash fows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets on the
basis of available information.
b) As explained to us all the fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management during the year in a phased periodical manner, which
in our opinion is reasonable, having regard to the size of the Company
and nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such physical verification.
c) In our opinion, the Company has not disposed off substantial part of
fixed assets during the year and the going concern status of the
Company is not affected.
2. In respect of its inventories:
a) As explained to us, inventories have been physically verified by the
management at regular intervals during the year. In our opinion, the
frequency of verification is reasonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c) The Company has maintained proper records of inventory. As explained
to us, there was no material discrepancies noticed on physical
verification of inventory as compared to the book records.
3. In respect of loans, secured or unsecured, granted or taken by the
Company to/from companies, frms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956:
a) The Company has given loans to its five subsidiaries. In respect of
the said loans, the maximum amount outstanding at any time during the
year is Rs. 25517.99 lacs and the year-end balance is Rs. 389.35 lacs.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, interest has been charged on loans except in case of two
subsidiaries and other terms and conditions, are not prima facie
prejudicial to the interest of the company.
c) The principal amounts, are repayable on demand and there is no
repayment schedule.
d) In respect of the said loans, the same are repayable on demand and
therefore the question of overdue amounts does not arise.
e) During the year Company has taken loan from two companies covered in
the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
The maximum amount involved was Rs. 456.90 Lacs and the balance at the
year end was Rs. Nil.
f) The rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loan taken by
the Company, secured or unsecured, are not prima facie prejudicial to
the interest of the Company.
g) The principal amounts, are repayable on demand and there is no
repayment schedule.
4. In respect of Internal Control:
In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, there is formal internal control system commensurate with the
size of the company and the nature of its business for the purchase of
inventory and fixed assets. As the company is Construction Company the
question of internal control over sale of goods does not arise. During
the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weaknesses in
absence of formal internal control system.
5. In respect of transactions need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956:
a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Particulars of contracts or arrangements that need to
be entered in to the register in pursuance of Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to the fact that the transactions of works
contract made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in to
the register in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and
exceeding the value of Rupees Five Lacs in respect of any party during
the year, have been made at prices which are reasonable having regard
to the prevailing market prices for such works contract at the relevant
time or the prices at which the transactions for similar works contract
have been made with other parties.
6. In respect of deposits from public:
The Company has not accepted any deposits during the year from the
public within the meaning of Section 58A and 58AA and other relevant
provisions of the Act and rules framed thereunder.
7. In respect of internal audit system:
In our opinion, the internal audit system of the Company is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. In respect of maintenance of cost records:
We have been informed that the central government has not prescribed
maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 in respect of company''s activities.
9. In respect of statutory dues:
a) According to the records of the Company, undisputed statutory dues
including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other statutory dues have been
generally regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid dues were
outstanding as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six months
from the date of becoming payable.
b) The disputed statutory dues aggregating to Rs.370.26 Lacs that have
not been deposited on account of matters pending before appropriate
authorities are as under:
Sr. Name of the
Statue Nature of Period to
which Forum where Dispute
is pending Amount
No. the Dues the amount
relates (Rs. in
Lacs)
01. The Custom
Act, 1962 Custom
duty 2001-2002 CESTAT, Mumbai 104.95
02. Orissa Sales
Tax Entry Tax 2000-2001 Commissioner of
Sales-tax Jajpur 0.75
Act, 1947
03. Orissa Sales
Tax Sales Tax 1993-1994
to Sales Tax Tribunal
Bhubaneshwar 4.55
Act,1947 1997-1998
04. Service Tax
Act, 1994 Service Tax 2005-2006 CESTAT, Ahmedabad 67.29
05. Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax 2004-05 ITAT, Ahmedabad
(Appeal by Dept) 124.21
06. Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax 2005-06 ITAT, Ahmedabad
(Appeal by Dept) 23.81
07. Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax 2006-07 ITAT, Ahmedabad
(Appeal by Dept) 9.00
08. Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income Tax 2007-08 CIT(A), Ahmedabad 35.7
TOTAL 370.26
10. In respect of accumulated losses and cash losses:
The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the
Financial Year. The Company has not incurred any cash losses during the
financial year covered by the audit and in the immediately proceeding
financial year.
11. In respect of dues to financial institution /banks /debentures:
Based on our audit procedures and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the Company has
not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions and banks.
12. In respect of loans and advances granted on the basis of security:
In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, no loans and advances have been granted by the Company on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
13. In respect of provision applicable to chit fund /nidhi / mutual
beneft fund / society:
In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund / nidhi / mutual beneft
fund/ society. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xiii) of paragraph
4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
14. In respect of dealing or trading in share, securities, debentures
and other investments:
According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company
is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other
investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause (xiv) of the paragraph
4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
15. In respect of guarantee given for loans taken by others:
In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given
to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions during the year except in
cases of Subsidiaries of the company.
16. In respect of application of term loans:
In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations given
to us, the term loans availed by the Company were, prima facie, applied
for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.
17. In respect of fund used:
According to the information and explanations given to us, and an
overall examination of the Cash fow statement and Balance Sheet of the
Company, we are of the opinion that no funds raised on short term basis
have been used for long term investment.
18. In respect of preferential allotment of shares:
The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the
Act, during the year.
19. In respect of securities created for debentures:
The Company has not issued any debenture during the year.
20. In respect of end use of money raised by public issues:
The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the
year.
21. In respect of fraud:
During the course of our examination of the books and records of the
Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
standards in India and according to the information and explanations
given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by
the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been
informed of such case by the management.
For SHASHIKANT PATEL ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
Firm Reg. No. 113672W
(S. D. PATEL)
Place : Ahmedabad PROPRIETOR
Date : April 20, 2011 Membership No. 37671
|