1.  We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Repro India Limited
 (the Company) as at March 31, 2011, the Profit and Loss account and
 the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date (all together
 referred to as the financial statements) annexed thereto. These
 financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
 management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
 financial statements based on our audit.
 
 2.  Weconductedourauditinaccordancewithauditing standards generally
 accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
 audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
 statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
 examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
 disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
 assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
 by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
 presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
 our opinion.
 
 3.  As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
 amended) (the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in
 terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we
 enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
 paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
 
 4.  Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
 report that:
 
 i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
 best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
 audit;
 
 ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
 been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
 those books;
 
 iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
 dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
 
 iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
 flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
 standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
 Companies Act, 1956.
 
 v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
 directors, as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
 Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
 March 31, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
 (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
 the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
 required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
 a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
 generally accepted in India;
 
 a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
 Company as at March 31, 2011;
 
 b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
 year ended on that date; and
 
 c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
 ended on that date.
 
 ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT
 
 Referred to in paragraph [3] of our report of even date
 
 (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
 particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
 assets.
 
 (b) All fixed assets were physically verified by the management in the
 previous year in accordance with a planned programme of verifying them
 once in three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard
 to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material
 discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
 
 (c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
 the year.
 
 (ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
 inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
 
 (b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
 the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
 the Company and the nature of its business.
 
 (c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
 material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
 
 (iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us,
 the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
 companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
 under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the
 provisions of clause 4(iii)(a) to (d) of the Order are not applicable
 to the Company and hence not commented upon.
 
 (b) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
 has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
 other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
 the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause
 4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and
 hence not commented upon.
 
 (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
 with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
 purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
 services.  During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
 major weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in
 the internal control system of the company in respect of these areas.
 
 (v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
 management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
 arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that
 need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 have
 been so entered.
 
 (b) In respect of transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
 arrangements and exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs entered into
 during the financial year, because of the unique and specialized nature
 of the items involved and absence of any comparable prices, we are
 unable to comment whether the transactions were made at prevailing
 market prices at the relevant time.
 
 (vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
 
 (vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
 commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
 
 (viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
 Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
 (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
 the products of the Company.
 
 (ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
 education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
 sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
 other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited
 with the appropriate authorities though there have been slight delays
 in few cases in payment of service tax and ESIC.
 
 Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the
 amount of cess payable under Section 441 A of the Companies Act, 1956,
 we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of
 the company in depositing the same.
 
 (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
 material undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund,
 investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance,
 income- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise
 duty, cess and other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the
 year end, for a period of more than six months from the date they
 became payable.
 
 (c) According to the records of the Company, the dues of works contract
 tax and excise duty which have not been deposited on account of any
 dispute are as follows:
 
 Name of the 
 statute         Nature of 
                  the         Amount (Rs.)   Period to 
                                           which       Forum where disp
                                                       ute dues
                                           amount 
                                           relates     is pending
 
 Central Excise 
 Act, 1944       Excise duty  17,340,854  April 2007 
                                           to          Office of
                                                       Commissioner
                                          December 
                                          2007         of Central Excise
                                                       (Appeals) - II
 
 Maharashtra 
 Value Added 
 Tax, 2002       Works 
                 Contract        294,130  2004-05      Office of Joint
 Tax                                                   Commissioner of 
                                                       Sales Tax 
                                                       (Appeal) - II
 
 (x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
 year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
 preceding financial year.
 
 (xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
 explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
 Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
 institution, bank or debenture holders.
 
 (xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
 based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
 granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
 shares, debentures and other securities.
 
 (xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/
 mutual benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
 4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
 
 (xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
 shares, securities, debentures and other investments.  Accordingly, the
 provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the
 Company.
 
 (xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
 Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
 or financial institutions.
 
 (xvi) Based on information and explanations given to us by the
 management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
 were obtained.
 
 (xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
 an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
 that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
 investment.
 
 (xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
 to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
 Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
 year.
 
 (xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
 the year.
 
 (xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed.for the purpose of
 reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
 the information and explanations given by the management, we report
 that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
 the course of our audit.
 
 For S.R. Batliboi & Co.
 Firm registration number: 301003E 
 Chartered Accountants
 
 per Vijay Maniar
 Partner
 Membership No.: 36738
 
 Mumbai, Date: May 24, 2011