1. Loans and Advances include interest free advances given by the
Company to RJL - Employee Welfare Trust aggregating to Rs. 33,800,000/-
(Previous year Rs. 36,000,000/-), for the benefit of designated Employees
pursuant to the proviso (b) to Section 77(2) of the Companies Act,
1956.
2. In the opinion of the Board, current assets, loans and advances are
approximately of the value stated, if realized in the ordinary course
of business. Provisions for all the known liabilities and depreciation
are adequate and not in excess of the amount reasonably necessary.
3. Contingent Liabilities not provided
for in respect of: As at As at
March 31,
2011 March 31,
2010
i) Guarantees given to banks against
credit facilities extended to
indirect subsidiary company 150,000,000 Nil
ii) Penalty levied by the Custom
Authorities 311,196 311,196
iii) Income Tax demand disputed in appeal:
Disputed by the Company Nil Nil
Disputed by the Department 9,257,560 9,257,560
iv) Estimated amount of contract remaining
to be executed on capital account
(Net of advances) 5,836,581 25,369,022
4. The Company has received a demand of Customs Duty along with the
penalty amounting to Rs. 167.58 Crores from the Commissioner of Customs,
Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai (Customs), alleging
that the import of finished jewellery for remaking is not a permitted
activity for an unit in SEEPZ SEZ and hence chargeable to Customs duty.
Further, the Commissioner has also preferred an appeal to CESTAT for
levy of interest of Rs. 22.84 Crores on the said Customs Duty. The
aggregate demand of Rs. 190.42 Crores is subject matter of Writ petition
filed by the Company in the Hon. Bombay High Court to challenge the
Jurisdiction of Customs & correctness of its contention.
5. Share Warrants :
During the year, The Company has issued 2,000,000 (Face Value Rs. 10/-
each) convertible warrants (Warrants) on preferential basis to the
promoters & Investors against which it has received Rupees
19,000,000/-, Each warrants carries a right to convert the same into
one equity share of Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs. 66/- as per the
formula prescribed under the SEBI (ICDR) Regulation 2009 over a period
of 18 months from the date of allotment.
The object of the issue is to meet the long term working capital
requirement, enhancement of competitiveness and strengthening of
financial position through long term resources.
6. Transaction with related party:
Related party disclosure as required by AS-18, ''Related Party
Disclosures'' notified by the Companies (Accounting Standard) Rules,
2006 are given below:
a) Key Management Personnel:
1) Mr. Niranjan A. Shah
2) Mr. Sumit N. Shah
3) Mr. Hitesh M. Shah
4) Mr. Neville R. Tata
b) Subsidiary Company:
1) Renaissance Jewelry N.Y Inc.
2) Verigold Jewellery (UK) Limited
3) N. Kumar Diamond Exports Limited
Indirect Subsidiary Companies
1) Renaissance Adrienne LLC (situated at California) (Subsidiary of
Renaissance Jewelry N.Y Inc.)
2) House Full International Ltd (Subsidiary of N. Kumar Diamond Exports
Limited)
3) Renaissance Realtors Private Limited (Subsidiary of N. Kumar Diamond
Exports Limited)
4) House Full Supply Chain Management Limited (Subsidiary of House Full
International Limited)
c) Associate Concerns/Companies/Trust under Control of Key Management
Personnel and Relatives:
1) Fancy Jewellery Private Limited
2) Anika Jewellery Private Limited
3) Niranjan Holdings Private Limited
4) Renaissance Jewellery Limited - Employee Group Gratuity Trust
5) Sumit Diamonds
7. Segment Reporting:
During the year Company operated in only one segment i.e. ''Jewellery.
8. (a) The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India vide its
General Notification No. S.O.301 (E) dated 8th February 2011 issued
under section 211 (3) of the Companies Act, 1956 has exempted certain
classes of companies from disclosing certain information in their
profit and loss account. The Company being an ''export oriented company''
is entitled to the exemption. Accordingly, disclosures mandated by
paragraphs 3(i)(a), 3(ii)(a), 3(ii)(b) and 3(ii)(d) of Part II,
Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956 have not been provided.
(b) The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, vide
General Circular No. 2 and 3 dated 8th February 2011 and 21st February
2011 respectively has granted a general exemption from compliance with
section 212 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to fulfillment of
conditions stipulated in the circular. The Company has satisfied the
condition stipulated in the circular''and hence is entitled to the
exemption. Necessary information relating to the subsidiaries has been
included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
9. Previous year''s figures are regrouped/rearranged, wherever
necessary.
|