PVR

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of PVR Limited (the
 Company) as at March 31, 2009 and also the Profit and Loss Account and
 the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
 thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
 Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
 these financial statements based on our audit.
 
 2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
 generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
 perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
 financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
 includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
 and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
 assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
 by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
 presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
 our opinion.
 
 3. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003 (as
 amended) (“the Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in
 terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we
 enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
 paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
 
 4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
 that:
 
 i. we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
 best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
 audit;
 
 ii. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
 been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
 those books;
 
 iii. the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
 dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
 
 iv. in our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
 flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
 standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
 Companies Act, 1956;
 
 v. on the basis of the written representations received from the
 directors, as on March 31, 2009, and taken on record by the Board of
 Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
 March 31, 2009 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
 (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 vi. in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
 the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
 required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
 a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
 generally accepted in India;
 
 a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
 Company as at March 31, 2009;
 
 b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
 year ended on that date; and
 
 c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
 ended on that date.
 
 Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
 
 Re: PVR LIMITED (the Company)
 
 (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
 particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
 assets.
 
 (b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the
 management during the year but there is a regular programme of
 verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
 size of the Company and the nature of its assets. As informed, no
 material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
 
 (c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
 
 (ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
 inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
 
 (b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
 the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
 the Company and the nature of its business.
 
 (c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
 material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
 
 (iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to three companies covered in
 the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 487,325,000 and the
 year end balance of loans outstanding from two parties was Rs.
 392,325,000.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for
 such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
 Company.
 
 (c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. The Company has
 received the repayment of loans as and when demanded by it, thus, there
 has been no default on the part of the companies to whom the money has
 been lent. The receipt of interest has been regular.
 
 (d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to aforesaid three
 companies listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
 Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (e) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
 unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
 register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(iii) (f) and (g) of the Order are
 not applicable to the Company.
 
 (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
 with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
 purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
 services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been
 noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.
 
 (v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
 management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
 arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that
 need to be entered into the register maintained under Section 301 have
 been so entered.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
 arrangements exceeding value of Rupees five lacs have been entered into
 during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having regard
 to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
 
 (vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
 
 (vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
 commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
 
 (viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
 Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
 (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
 the products of the Company.
 
 (ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
 education and protection fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax,
 sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess
 have regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities.
 
 (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
 undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
 education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
 wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
 other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for
 a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
 
 (c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
 are no dues of income tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs
 duty, excise duty and cess which have not been deposited on account of
 any dispute.
 
 (x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
 year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
 preceding financial year.
 
 (xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
 explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
 Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
 institution or banks. We have been informed that the Company did not
 have any outstanding debentures during the year.
 
 (xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
 based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
 granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
 shares, debentures and other securities.
 
 (xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
 benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
 the Order are not applicable to the Company.
 
 (xiv) In respect of dealing/trading in units of mutual funds, in our
 opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us,
 proper records have been maintained of the transactions and contracts
 and timely entries have been made therein. The units have been held by
 the Company, in its own name.
 
 (xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
 Company has given guarantee for loans taken by a subsidiary company
 from a financial institution and counter guarantee to a bank for the
 bank guarantee furnished to Office of the Additional Collector, Mumbai
 suburban district, (entertainment tax authorities) by a subsidiary
 company, the terms and conditions whereof in our opinion are not
 prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
 
 (xvi) Based on information and explanations given to us by the
 management, out of proceeds of term loans from a bank amounting to Rs.
 100,000,000, unutilized amounts aggregating to Rs. 90,644,278, were
 lying in the units of mutual funds. Read with above, all other term
 loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.
 
 (xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
 an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
 that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
 investment.
 
 (xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
 to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
 Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 (xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
 year.
 
 (xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
 the year. However, we have verified the end use of money raised by
 public issues in an earlier year, as disclosed in the notes to the
 financial statements (Refer Note No. 11.2 of Schedule 22).
 
 (xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
 reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
 the information and explanations given by the management, we report
 that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
 the course of our audit.
 
                           For S. R. Batliboi & Co.  
                           Chartered Accountants
 
                           per Anil Gupta
 
                           Partner
 
                           Membership No: 87921
 
 Place : Gurgaon
 Date : May 29, 2009