Power Finance Corporation
BSE: 532810 | NSE: PFC | ISIN: INE134E01011 | Finance - Term Lending Institutions
- Directors Report
- Chairman's Speech
- Auditors Report
- Notes To Accounts
- Accounting Policy
- Finished Products
- Raw Materials
| Notes to Accounts | Year End : Mar '08 |
1. Contingent liabilities: (i) Guarantees issued by the Corporation in foreign currency. (a) EURO 1.421 million equivalents to Rs.9.02crores (previous year EURO 1.776 million equivalent to Rs.10.36 crores). (b) US$ 24.545 million equivalent to Rs.98.45 crores (previous year US$ 27.95 million equivalent to Rs.122.32 crores). (ii) Guarantee issued by the Corporation in Indian Rupee: Rs.400.04 crores, (previous year Rs. 224.52 crores). (iii) The Corporation has issued letters of comfort for disbursement of loans to borrowers amounting to Rs.3205.97 crores (Previous year Rs.3014.38 crores) against which a sum of Rs. 2410.76 crores (Previous Year Rs. 1931.11 crores) has been disbursed to borrowers. (iv) The additional demands raised by Income Tax Deptt. (net of relief granted by Appellate Authorities) of Rs.3.39 crores for Assessment Year 1996-97, Rs.28.56 crores for Assessment Year 1997-98, Rs.0.13 crores for Assessment Year 1998-99, Rs.17.47 crores for Assessment Year 1999-2000, Rs.18.77 crores for Assessment Year 2000-01, Rs.23.36 crores for Assessment Year 2001-02, Rs.24.71 crores for Assessment Year 2002-03, Rs.23.07 crores for Assessment Year 2003-04, Rs.63.88 crores for Assessment Year 2004-05 and Rs.23.64 crores for Assessment Year 2005-06 were paid and provided for. For Assessment Year 2006-07 Assessing Officer has raised a demand of Rs.44.23 crores against which Rs.38.92 crores is paid and for the balance amount of Rs.5.31 crores stay is applied. The company has filed an appeal against this demand and based upon the decision of ITAT on similar issues for Assessment Year 1996-97, being final and binding on PFC as well as Income Tax Deptt., as Committee of Disputes has not granted permission to either party to pursue the matter further, the management do not feel it is necessary to make any provision for this demand. (v) In respect of cess on turnover or gross receipt of company u/s 441 A of Companies Act, to be levied @ not less than 0.005% and not more than 0.1% on the value of annual turnover or gross receipt whichever is higher. No provision has been made as the cess rate & the date from which it is applicable has not been notified so far by the Govt. Though no such notification has been issued so far, the Corporation may have to pay cess minimum of Rs.1.07 crores and maximum of Rs. 21.43 crores if levied from the financial year 2002-03. (vi) Contracts of Capital nature remaining to be executed and not provided for Rs.0.17 crores. (Previous year Rs.NIL). (vii) Claim not acknowledged as debts are Rs.7.80 crores (previous year NIL). 2. The Govt.of India, Ministry of Power, under section 58(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (MPRA) issued an order No 42/8/2000-R&R dated 12.04.2001 through which assets, transfer rights, liabilities, undertaking etc, of erstwhile Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (MPEB) were passed on to the successor boards namely MPSEB & CSEB after bifurcation of state of Madhya Pradesh. Subsequently, the GOI, Ministry of Power through the Gazette of India Extraordinary-MOP, New Delhi notification dtd.4.11.2004 had decided to divide the liability and assets of erstwhile MPEB into MPSEB & CSEB in the ratio of fixed assets of 90:10 respectively. Consequent upon this, CSEB has informed that although it has been clearing the dues of PFC based on the acquired liability of erstwhile MPEB at Rs.110.64 crores, it has requested the corporation to align the dues in line with MoP order to Rs.105.23 crores. Nevertheless, the corporation will receive the full amount of principal payment either from CSEB or MPSEB. Further, PFC has taken up the matter with MoP and has requested MoP to review and revise the order on a plea that PFC’s loans are project specific and the amount disbursed actually goes into the creation of the assets on such projects are not to be allocated in the manner as suggested by MoP in the new order. 3. A project under the implementation having total outstanding of Rs.94.54 crores excluding additional disbursement of Rs.91 crores under the loan (previous year as on 31.03.2007 Rs.98.18 crores excluding additional disbursement of Rs.70 crores) has been considered as Standard Asset in terms of RBI Circular No. DBS.FID.No.C-11/01.02.00/2001-02 dated 1.02.2002 read with D.O. letter DBS.FID No.1285/01.02.00/2001-02S dated 14.05.2002 though the borrower had not cleared its entire dues since 23.09.2000 except on additional loan of Rs.91 crores,Though the above dispensation is available upto June,2008 only, the institutions propose to review the status of the project as the financial closure has since been achieved in order to adopt the Date of Commissioning as agreed by the Institutions in the Common Loan agreement. Keeping in view the positive factors in this project such as achievement of RBI norm for financial closure by tying up at least 90% of the project cost, substantial progress on the Project which is being monitored by MoP as well as PFC, availability of approvals for financial restructuring package from almost all the lenders and implementation of the Project by the Management appointed by the lenders. The interest on this loan is not recognized on accrual basis. A remittance of Rs.17.60 crores (including penal and interest on interest) made during the year relating to past dues have been accounted for in the books as income on receipt basis as per the terms of the original agreement. Further, the interest of Rs.7.40 crores (including penal and interest on interest) earned on additional disbursed loan amount of Rs.91 crores has also been recognized as income on receipt basis. 4. In the case of one of the borrower, the Board of Directors had given an In principle approval‘ of Interest Restructuring with effect from 15.07.2004, However, the same was subsequently approved with effect from 15.10.2004 subject to fulfillment of certain conditions.The party has been paying the interest as per oringial terms and the amount in excess of restructured rates amounting to Rs.25.09 crores (previous year Rs.23.20 crores) for the period 15.10.2004 to 15.10.2007 has been retained as other liabilities.The interest on this loan has again become due for reset with effect from 15.10.2007 at the original rate as was applicable at the time of initial restructuring. Accordingly the interest income has been booked @ 16.84% as against the borrower’s request for fixing the interest in line with other consortium lenders, i.e.10.5 %.Pending the decision on the borrower’s request, with effect from 15.10.2007, the interest income has been accounted for as Rs. 8.94 crores as against Rs. 5.58 crores on the basis of borrower’s request. 5. In case of one of the borrower, the dispute regarding recovery of interest amounting to Rs.46.19 crores as on 31.03.2007 has been settled for Rs.18.97 crores with the approval of respective Board of Directors. The amount so settled has been accounted for as the Income for the year following the provisions of clause 9.5 of the Accounting Standard 9. 6. The Prudential Norms of the Corporation have been revised for the financial year 2007-08 to 2009-10 with the approval of the Ministry of Power vide their letter dated 19th April,2007 with partial modification vide their letter dated 31st March,2008. 7. (i) Assets of Rs.13.97 crores (Previous year Rs.43.20 crores) were classified as Non Performing Assets in terms of prudential norms of the corporation. Accordingly, a provision of Rs.6.81 crores is held in the accounts (provision held in previous year Rs.17.01 crores). (ii) The total principal loan amount in default (excluding NPAs) is Rs.74.83 crores, (previous year Rs.13.70 crores) which is considered good. (iii) The company has recovered a sum of Rs.83.93 crores (including interest upto 31st March, 2008) of Interest subsidy under AG & SP from various borrowers where the same was withdrawn by the Ministry of Power vide their order dated 31stMarch,2007. The amount has been retained as amount payable to Ministry of Power. (iv) Non payment pertaining to refund of AG&SP subsidy (including interest upto 31st March, 2008) amounting to Rs.93.73 crores from two parties are yet to be recovered and the same is payable to the Ministry of Power after the same is received. (v) In case of two gas based projects , having an aggregate outstanding of Rs.587.32 crores, the terms of repayment have been renegotiated due to non allocation of gas and the same have been classified as standard assets in line with clause 6C (ii) of the Prudential Norms adopted by the company. (vi) During the year, Corporation has changed its Prudential Norms for provision for non-performing assets from Sub-standard Assets to Doubtful Assets from 24 months to 18 months from the date of asset becoming non-performing asset. This change has resulted in increase in provision by Rs. 1.07 crores. 8. The Corporation discontinued interest rate restructuring policy w.e.f. December 2005. However, the loans which were restructured with 3 year reset (after 3 years the loan shall carry original interest rate i.e. the rate before interest restructuring). Borrower was given option to seek further restructuring after 3 years, on payment of 50% premium being NPV of difference between Original interest rate and Current interest rate for the entire remaining period of Loan. Accordingly the Corporation has done interest restructuring amounting to Rs.85.22 crores (previous year NIL). An amount of Rs. 0.07 crores (previous year NIL) has been received and credited to Profit and Loss Account as Interest Restructuring Premium (Refer schedule 10). 9. (i) The Corporation is not required to create Bond Redemption Reserve in respect of bonds by virtue of the Department of Company Affairs’ Circular of 18.04.2002 according to which the financial institutions within the meaning of section 4A of the Companies Act 1956 were not required to create Bond Redemption Reserve in case of privately placed debentures. (ii) The Corporation is not required to maintain Reserve Fund under Section 45-IC of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 by transferring 20 percent of its net profits, as it is exempted by RBI vide its letter dated 24.01.2000. 12. Interest Differential Fund (IDF) – KFW Since the agreement entered into between KFW and PFC provides that the IDF belongs to the borrowers solely and will be used to cover the exchange risk variations under this Loan and any excess will be used in accordance with the agreement, the balance in the IDF fund has been kept under separate account head titled as KFW-Interest Differential Fund and shown as a liability. The total fund accumulated as on 31.03.2008 is Rs.36.85 crores (previous year Rs. 38.61 crores) after adjusting the translation loss of Rs. 18.24 crores (previous year Rs. 12.09 crores). 13. The foreign exchange loss (net) of Rs. 20.14 crores (previous year foreign exchange gain of Rs.7.39 crores) arising on repayment and translation of foreign currency assets and liabilities has been taken to Profit and Loss Account during the year. 14. The company was having outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts and principal only swaps amounting to US $ 20 million and US $ 110 million respectively and the same have been considered for valuation of foreign exchange liabilities as per Accounting Standard 11. 15. (a) Assets under finance lease prior to 01.04.2001 (i) The Corporation has purchased assets amounting to Rs.280 crores from APSEB (now APGENCO), which in turn were leased out to them. Sale Deed between PFC and APSEB (now APGENCO) was executed on 14.02.97 for the amount of Rs.264.10 crores only. However, the execution of Supplementary Sale Deed for the balance amount of Rs. 15.89 crores (previous year Rs 15.89 crores) is pending though the same has been considered for fixing lease rental. In respect of the above, the Corporation approved for extension of secondary lease period @ nominal rental of Rs. 1000/- p.a for the period of 5 years & transfer of assets to APEGENCO anytime during five year, on payment of balances rental on unexpired lease period and any other charges, as may be agreed by APGENCO. Further APGENCO requested for transfer of the residual asset (Boiler and Steam Turbine of Kothagudem TPS Stage-unit 9) to them at the earliest & complete the formalities. The same is pending for final decision. (ii) In respect of assets leased to MSEB, the asset has been capitalized for Rs.5.46 crores. Out of the above, the payment of Rs.0.45 crores (previous year Rs.0.45 crore) is still outstanding. However, the same has been considered for fixing lease rental. (b) Asset under finance lease after 01.04.2001 (i) Gross investment in the leased assets and the present value of the minimum value receivable at the balance sheet date has been covered in the note with the description as total of future minimum lease payments and present value of the lease payments amounting to Rs.302.12 crores and Rs.211.67 crores respectively. The reconciliation of these figures has also been indicated under the head “unmature finance charges” with an amount of Rs. 90.45 crores. (ii) In case of Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Ltd, the Corporation had sanctioned an amount of Rs.88.90 crores to RRECL in the year 2004 for financing Wind turbine Generator which was reduced to Rs.88.85 crores in December 2006. The Gross Investment stood at the level of Rs.91.24 crores. The lease rent is to be recovered within a period of 15 Years, which comprises of 10 years as a primary period and 5 years as a secondary period. (iii) In case of Enercon Windfarms (Jaisalmer) Pvt. Ltd, the Corporation had sanctioned an amount of Rs.98.44 crores to Enercon Windfarms (Jaiselmer) in the year 2004 for financing Wind turbine Generator. The Gross Investment stood at Rs.108.37 crores. The lease rent is to be recovered within a period of 20 years, which, comprises of 10 years as a primary period and 10 years as a secondary period. (iv) In case of Enercon Windfarms (Rajasthan) Pvt. Ltd, the Corporation had sanctioned an amount of Rs.93.51 crores to Enercon Windfarms (Rajasthan) in the year 2004 for financing Wind turbine Generator. The Gross Investment stood at Rs.102.51 crores. The lease rent is to be recovered within a period of 20 years which comprises of 10 years as a primary period and 10 years as a secondary period. 16. Subsidy under Accelerated Generation & Supply Programme (AG&SP): The Corporation is claiming subsidy from Govt. of India at Net Present Value calculated at indicative interest rates in accordance with GOI’s letter vide D.O.No.32024/17/97-PFC dated 23.09.1997 and O.M.No.32024/23/2001-PFC dated 07.03.2003 irrespective of the actual repayment schedule, moratorium period and duration of repayment. The amount of interest subsidy received and passed on to the borrower is retained as Interest Subsidy Fund Account. The impact of difference between the indicative rate and period considered at the time of claims and at the time of actual disbursement can be ascertained only after the end of the respective schemes. However on the basis of the projections made for each project (based upon the certain assumptions and also that these will remain same over the projected period of each loan / project) the corporation estimated the net excess amount of Rs. 253.47 crores and Rs. 52.49 crores as at 31/03/2008 for ixth & xth plan respectively under AG&SP schemes. This net excess amount is worked out on overall basis & not on individual basis & may vary due to change in assumptions , if any during the projected period such as changes in moratorium period , repayment period , loan restructuring , pre payment , interest rate reset etc. Hence the corporation will return the net excess amount, if any at the end of the respective scheme. The amount of Rs.1066.75 crores (previous year Rs.1231.63 crores) under the head Interest Subsidy Fund represents the amount of subsidy received from Ministry of Power, Govt. of India which is to be passed on to the borrowers against their interest liability arising in future under Accelerated Generation & Supply Programme (AG&SP) which comprises of the following:- 17. Some of the State Electricity Boards against whom loans are outstanding were restructured by the respective State Governments and new entities were formed. Consequently, the liabilities stand transferred to new entities and transfer agreement were to be executed amongst the Corporation and New Entities. In case of MPSEB and for UPSEB transfer agreements are yet to be executed Consequent upon the formation of new state of Chhatisgarh, the transfer agreements are yet to be executed in respect of loans transferred from MPSEB to CSEB. 18. (i) The Corporation has complied with all the applicable Accounting Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. (ii) The Corporation does not have more than one reportable segment in terms of Accounting Standard No. 17 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. 19. The net deferred tax liabilities is Rs.1240.25 crores (previous year Rs.1142.60 crores) computed as per Accounting Standard 22 Accounting for Taxes on Income. 20. The Deferred Tax Assets/Liabilities have been created in terms of the Accounting Standard 22 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) since the year it became applicable to the company, i.e., 2001-02 except on account of “Special reserve created and maintained under section 36(1) (viii) of Income Tax Act.” on which the DTL was created by debiting profit & loss account for 2004-05 & by charging revenue reserve for 2001-02 to 2003-04. However, PFC has taken up the issue for total withdrawal of DTL on Special Reserve with the ICAI and with Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The Institute in its letter dated 04-04-2007 stated that the Accounting Standard Board examined AS 22, Accounting for Taxes on Income, in the light of the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee. It is further stated that “the Board decided to take up the revision of the standard on the lines of the corresponding IAS, namely, IAS 12, Income taxes, as a part of its convergence with IFRS project. It was argued that since IAS 12 is based on the ‘balance sheet approach ‘as against ‘income statement approach’ on which the existing AS 22 is based, the problem being encountered by the company may not arise”. Ministry of Corporate Affairs also endorsed the letter issued by ICAI to PFC. 22. The Corporation has no outstanding liability towards small-scale industrial undertakings. 23. The value of lease hold land aggregating to Rs.38.33 crores (previous year Rs.38.33 crores) comprises of amount of Rs.31.83. crores (previous year Rs.31.83 crores) paid as deposit to Land and Development Office (L&DO), Ministry of Urban Affairs, Govt. of India , stamp duty liability of Rs.2.47 crores (previous year Rs.2.47 crores) and capitalization of ground rent upto the date of completion of building of Rs.4.03 crores ( previous year Rs. 4.03 crores) In accordance with Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) executed with L&DO, the lease deed is yet to be signed. Pending execution of perpetual lease deed, (which does not have limited useful life) the value of leasehold land is not amortized and /or no provision for depreciation has been made on the said leasehold land. 25. Pending receipt / approval of some of the final bills of contractors, the cost of building, plant & machinery and equipment have been adjusted capitalized during the year on a provisional basis. Depreciation has also been provided on provisional capitalization amounts. 26. The pay revision of the employees of the corporation is due w.e.f. 01.01.2007 Pending revision of pay, a provision of Rs 19.60 crores has been made on estimated basis for the period 01.01.2007 to 31.03.2008. 27. Provision for gratuity, sick leave, earned leave, post retirement medical benefits, economic rehabilitation benefit, leave travel concession, settlement allowance after retirement and service award scheme are accounted for on actuarial basis as per AS 15 (revised) at the year end. The actuarial valuation has been made on the basis of present emoluments without considering the expected wage revision as the same is not ascertainable with reasonable accuracy. 28. During the year, the Corporation has sent letters seeking confirmation of balances as on Dec 31, 2007 to borrowers. However, confirmation in a few cases were yet to be received. 29. Previous year’s figures have been re-grouped / re-arranged, wherever practicable, to make them comparable with the current year. 30. Figures have been rounded off to the nearest lakh of rupees. 31. Balance Sheet abstract and Company’s General Business Profile as per Part IV of Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956 is enclosed as Appendix. |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Religare Technova | |
![]() | |




Online










