Real-time Stock quotes, portfolio, LIVE TV and more.
-0.25 (-3.36%)
-0.3 (-4.03%) | Auditor's Report (Orient Paper and Industries) | Year End : Mar '12 |
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of ORIENT PAPER &
INDUSTRIES LIMITED (the Company) as at 31st March, 2012 and also the
Statement of Profit & Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended
on that date, annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. As stated in to Note No.40, no provision has been made for Water
Tax demand amounting to Rs.21879.32 lacs (including interest and
penalty) since the Company''s application for waiver thereof is under
consideration by the Government of Madhya Pradesh. Had the above
liability been considered, profit for the year would have been Rs.
6447.01 lacs (after considering tax impact) as against the reported
profit of Rs. 21227.58 lacs and reserves & surplus as at the balance
sheet date would have been Rs.95027.79 lacs as against the reported
figure of Rs.109808.36 lacs.
In respect of above, the previous year''s audit report was similarly
modified.
5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above :-
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law, have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit & Loss and Cash Flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit & Loss
and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred
to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 31st March, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31,
2012 from being appointed as Director in terms of Clause (g) of sub-
section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said statements of account, except
for the possible impact of our comments on the matter stated in para
(4) above, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India :-
i) in the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company
as at 31st March, 2012;
ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit & Loss, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of Cash Flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
annexure to the auditors'' report (referred to in our report of even
date to the members of orient paper & industries limited as at and for
the year ended 31st march, 2012)
i) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the management
during the year but there is a regular programme of verification
(except for assets of the written down value of Rs.1416.86 lacs at
Brajrajnagar unit, due to suspension of production activities) which,
in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company
and the nature of its assets. As informed, no material discrepancies
were noticed on such verification. However, discrepancies, if any, at
Brajrajnagar unit are unascertainable due to non verification of fixed
assets for the reasons mentioned above.
c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
the year.
ii) a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory
at reasonable intervals during the year except for the value of
Rs.32.90 lacs at Brajrajnagar unit, due to suspension of production
activities.
b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
Company and the nature of its business.
c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.
However, discrepancies, if any, at Brajrajnagar unit are
unascertainable due to non verification of inventories for the reasons
mentioned in
(a) above.
iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4
(iii ) (a) to (d) of the Order are not applicable to - the Company and
hence not commented upon.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4
(iii ) (e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and
hence not commented upon.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, and having regard to the explanation that some of the
items purchased are of a proprietary nature and alternate sources do
not exist for obtaining quotations thereof, it appears that there is an
adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the
Company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory
and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the
course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or
continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the internal
control system of the Company in respect of these areas.
v) a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that
need to be entered into the register maintained under the above
section, have been so entered.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs entered into
during the financial year, are at prices which are reasonable having
regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
vi) The Company has not accepted any deposit from the public.
vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 in respect of paper, cement, electrical consumer durables and
chemicals and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained.
ix) a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance,
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty and other material statutory dues applicable to it though there
have been slight delays in certain cases and also certain payments are
not yet made as indicated in (b) below.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us,
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and
other material statutory dues outstanding at the year end for a period
of more than six months from the date they became payable, are as
follows :
Name of the
statute Nature
of the Amount Period to
which the Due Date Date of
Payment
dues (Rs in
lacs) amount
relates
Orissa
Municipal
Act Industrial
Licence 21.10 1996-97 to Beginning
of the Not yet
Paid
Fees 2010-11 respective
years
Electricity
Duty Act
(Orissa) Interest
on duty
payable 74.43 1998-99 to Subsequent Not yet
Paid
on own
generation
of power 2009-10 month after
accrual
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding in
respect of sales tax, income tax, custom duty, wealth tax, service tax,
excise duty & cess on account of any dispute, are as follows :
Name of the
statute Nature of
the dues Period to
which Amount Forum where
dispute
the amount (Rs. in
lacs) is pending
relates
Central
Excise and Disallowance
of Cenvat credit 1979-83, 778.08 Deputy/
Assistant
Commissioner/
Customs Act,
1944 on inputs and
capital goods 1986-98, Commissioner
/High
2000-2010 Court/ CESTAT
Inclusion of
interest in
Assessable value 1994-96 10.99 Dy.
Commissioner/
Commissioner
Disallowance of
refund on post 1976-77 to 149.06 Deputy
Commissioner
manufacturing
expenses of paper 1983-84
Differential
duty on
manufacture of 1975 to 1977, 47.49 Asst Commiss
-ioner/ Deputy
paper/ duty on
various inputs
due to 1978 to 1985, Commissioner/
Commissioner
difference in
classification/
Duty on 1993-97,
2000-01, Appeals/Addl.
Commissioner/
shortage
/excess etc. 2002-03 &
2005-07 Jt.
Commissioner
A. P. Sales
Tax/AP Vat
Act/ Demand on
second sales
and freight 1983-85,
1990-91, 282.23 Asst.
Commissioner/
Appellate
Central Sales
Tax Act, 1956 charges
realized
separately by
raising 1993-94 to Dy.
Commissioner/
Sales Tax
Appellate
debit invoices
and other
matters 2004-05 &
2009-10 Tribunal/
High Court.
MP Sales
Tax Act,
1961/ Demand with
respect to
disallowance of 1998-99, 59.27 Deputy
Commissioner
Appeals/
Central Sales
Tax Act 1956 cash discount,
levy of higher
rate of 2000-02 &
2005-06 Appellate
Board/High
Court
purchase
tax, differ
-ence in
classific
ation of
goods etc.
Other State
/Central
Sales Tax
Acts Sales tax on
stock transfer/
export sales, Various 212.51 Asst. Commiss
ioner/ Deputy
non submission
of forms,
penalty etc. commissioner/
Sales Tax
officer/Sales
Tax Appellate
Tribunal/
High court/
Supreme Court
Income Tax
Act,1961 Tax deducted
at source &
interest
thereon 2006-07 to
2008-09 2,699.77 Commissioner
(Appeals)
M.P. Upkar
Adhinium,
2004 Energy
development
cess on
consumption 2001-2002 to 3,090.61 Supreme Court
of Captive
power
including
surcharge 2011-12
x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current year and in the
immediately preceding financial year.
xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial
institutions, banks or debenture holders.
xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society and therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Order are not applicable.
xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Order are not applicable.
xv) According to the information and explanations provided to us, the
Company has not given guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or
financial institutions.
xvi) Based on the information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which these
were obtained.
xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
xviii) The Company has made preferential allotment of shares to a
company covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. In our opinion, the price at which shares have
been issued is not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company had created security in respect of debentures issued in earlier
years and outstanding during the year.
xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
the year.
xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For S.R. BATLIBOI & CO.
Firm Registration Number : 301003E
Chartered Accountants
per Raj Agrawal
Place : New Delhi. Partner
Date : 2nd May,2012 Membership No. 82028 |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited | |
![]() | |