1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of NETTLINX LIMITED, as
at 31st March, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account of the company
for the year ended on that date annexed thereto and the Cash Flow
Statement for the year ended on that date. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion..
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, as
amended, issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub
section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in
the annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5
of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that::
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report
that none of the directors are disqualified as at 31st March, 2011 from
being appointed as a director in terms of Clause (g) of sub- section
(1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956; and
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read with the notes
thereon give the information required by the Companies Act 1956, in the
manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2011;
(ii) in the case of profit and loss account, of the loss for the year
ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows of the
company for the year ended on that date..
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITOR''S REPORT
The annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date to
the members of NETTLINX LIMITED as at 31st March 2011
(1) (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the fixed
assets have been physically verified by the management at regular
intervals and no material discrepancies between the book records and
the physical inventory have been noticed on such verification.
(c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and
therefore, do not effect the going concern assumption.
(2) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory
at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inven- tory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the com- pany and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of in- ventory and no
material discrepancies were no- ticed on such physical verification.
(3) (a) As Informed, the company has not granted any loans, secured or
unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. Therefore the
provisions of clause (iii) (b) to (d) of the order are not applicable.
(b) As informed, the company has not taken any loans, secured or
unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956. Hence the
provisions of clause (iii) (f) & (g) of the order are not applicable.
(4) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate with size of the company and the nature of its business,
with regard to the purchase of fixed assets and for of services.
Further, on the basis of our examination and according to the
information and explanations given to us, we have neither come across
nor have we been informed of any instance of major weakness in the
aforesaid internal control system.
(5) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
have been no contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of
the companies Act 1956 during the year to be entered in the register
required to be maintained under that section. Accordingly, commenting
on transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements
does not arise.
(6) The company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Section 58A and 58AA of the Act and the rules framed
there under.
(7) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(8) As per the information and explanations given to us, in respect of
the class of industry the Company falls under, the maintenance of cost
records has not been prescribed by the Central Government under Section
209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, the provision of
clause (viii) of paragraph 4 of the Order is not applicable to the
Company.
(9) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, and
as per the records of the Company, in our opinion the Company is
generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including
Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees''
State Insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues with
the appropriate authorities, where applicable. Based on the
information furnished to us, there are no undisputed statutory dues as
on 31st March 2011, which are outstanding for a period exceeding six
months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
are no cases of non-deposit with the appropriate authorities of
disputed dues of sales tax/ income tax/ customs tax/ wealth tax/
service tax/ excise duty and Cess.
(10) The company has not incurred cash losses during the financial year
under audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.
(11) According to the records of the company examined by us and the
information and explanation given to us, the company has not defaulted
in repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank or debenture
holders as at the balance sheet date.
(12) The company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, securities, debentures and other
investments.
(13) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund
/society. Therefore, the provisions of sub clause (a), (b), (c) and (d)
of clause (xiii) of paragraph 4 of the Order are not applicable to the
Company.
(14) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (xiv) of
paragraph 4 of the Companies ( Auditors Report )Order 2003 are not
applicable to the Company.
(15) The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others
from bank or financial institutions and hence clause (xv) of paragraph
4 of the Order is not applicable to the Company.
(16) The company has not obtained any term loans during the Financial
Year.
(17) On the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the
company, in our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no funds raised on a short-term
basis which have been used for long-term investment.
(18) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotment of share to the parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under sec.301 of the
companies Act 1956 and hence the applicability of the clause regarding
the price at which shares have been issued and whether the same is
prejudicial to the interest of the company does not rise.
(19) The company has not issued debentures and hence clause (xix) of
paragraph 4 of the Order is not applicable to the Company.
(20) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
the year. Therefore, the provision of clause (xx) of paragraph 4 of the
Order is not applicable to the Company.
(21) Based on the audit procedures performed and information given to
us and the representation made by the Management, we report that no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year
For M/s. DEVA & CO
Chartered Accountants
Firm Reg.No:000722S
Sd/-
(M. Devaraja Reddy)
Partner
Membership No. 026202
Place : Hyderabad
Date : 24.08.2011
|