1. We have audited the attached Balance sheet of Navin Fluorine
International Limited as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and Loss
account and also the Cash-flow Statement for the year ended on that
date, annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (CARO),
issued by the Central Government in terms of section 227 (4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report as follows:
i. we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii. the Balance sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash-flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv. in our opinion, the Balance sheet, Profit and Loss account and
Cash-flow statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
v. in our opinion, and to the best of our information, and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required, and
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
a) in the case of the Balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
b) in the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date and
c) in the case of the Cash-flow statement, of the cash-flows for the
year ended on that date.
vi. On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274 (1) (g) of
the Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditors report Re: Navin Fluorine International
Limited (referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
1. Having regard to the nature of the Companys business / activities
/ results, clauses (vi), (x), (xii), (xiii), (xiv), (xv), (xviii) and
(xx) of paragraph 4 of CARO are not applicable to the Company for the
year.
2. In respect of its fixed assets :
a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the
management in accordance with a regular programme of verification,
which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the
fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do
not constitute a substantial part of fixed assets of the Company and
such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern
status of the Company.
3. In respect of its Inventory :
a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified during
the year by the management at reasonable intervals.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventories
and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
4. The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or
unsecured to / from companies, firms or other parties listed in the
Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
5. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items
purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are
not readily available for obtaining comparable quotations, there is an
adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the
Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases of
inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services. During
the course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness in
such internal control system.
6. In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the Register
maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, to
the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information
and explanations given to us:
a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to Section 301
that needed to be entered in the Register maintained under the said
Section have been so entered.
b) Where each of such transaction is in excess of Rs.5 lacs in respect
of any party, the transactions have been made at prices which are prima
facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
7. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the
year by firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management have
been commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956, and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained except that the
prescribed cost statements are in the process of being compiled for the
year. We have, however, not made a detailed examination of the records
with a view to determining whether they are accurate or complete. To
the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed the
maintenance of cost records for any other product of the Company.
9. According to the information and explanations given to us in
respect of Statutory dues ;
a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax,
Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate
authorities.
b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax,
Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory
dues in arrears as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
c) Details of dues in respect of income-tax, excise duty, customs duty,
wealth-tax, sales-tax, service tax and cess which have not been
deposited as on 31st March, 2011 on account of disputes are given below
:
Statute Nature of Dues Forum where Dispute
is pending
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax ITAT, Mumbai
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax CIT, Appeals, VII,Mumbai
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax CIT, Appeals, VII,Mumbai
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax CIT, Appeals, VII,Mumbai
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax CIT, Appeals, VII,Mumbai
Central Excise Act Excise Duty High Court
Central Excise Act Excise Duty Commissioner of Central
Excise
Central Excise Act Excise Duty Assistant Commissioner
of Central Excise
Central Excise Act Excise Duty Commissioner of Central
Excise
Central Excise Act Excise Duty Commissioner of Central
Excise
M.P. Sales Tax Act Sales Tax Deputy Commissioner
The West Bengal Value Value Added Tax Deputy Commissioner Appeals
Added Tax Act
M.P. Commercial Tax Commercial Tax Assistant Commissioner of
Act 1994 Commercial Taxes
U.P. VAT Act Value Added Tax Sales Tax Appelate Tribunal
The West Bengal Value Value Added Tax Appelate Board
Added Tax Act
M.P. Sales Tax Act C.S.T. & Entry Tax Appelate Board
M.P. Sales Tax Act C.S.T. & Department of Industries
Commercial Tax M.P. Government
M.P. Commercial Tax Act Commercial Tax Madhya Pradesh High Court
U.P. VAT Act Value Added Tax Allahabad High Court
The West Bengal Value Value Added Tax Senior Joint Commissioner
Added Tax Act
The West Bengal Value Value Added Tax Appellate Revisional Board
Added Tax Act
Statue Period to which the Amount involved
amount relates (Rs. in lacs)
Income Tax Act, 1961 2005-06 0.37
Income Tax Act, 1961 2005-06 98.74
Income Tax Act, 1961 2006 - 07 226.33
Income Tax Act, 1961 2007 - 08 78.47
Income Tax Act, 1961 2008 - 09 15.96
Central Excise Act 1993-94 to 2005-06 90.33
Central Excise Act 2005 – 06 & 2006 - 07 0.17
Central Excise Act 1994 – 95 & 1997 - 98 0.98
Central Excise Act 2007-08 36.25
Central Excise Act 2008-09 30.68
M.P. Sales Tax Act 2006 – 07 47.97
The West Bengal Value
Added Tax Act 2000 – 01 to 2004 - 05 13.96
M.P. Commercial Tax
Act 1994 1992 – 93, 1994 – 95 8.30
to 1996 – 97
U.P. VAT Act 2001 - 02 1.68
The West Bengal Value
Added Tax Act 1999 – 00 2.06
M.P. Sales Tax Act 1996 – 97 & 2005 – 06 18.52
M.P. Sales Tax Act 1997 – 98 12.42
M.P. Commercial Tax Act 1990 – 91 to 1995 – 96 28.51
U.P. VAT Act 1998 – 99 to 2001 – 02 72.02
The West Bengal Value
Added Tax Act 2005 – 06 2.69
The West Bengal Value
Added Tax Act 1994 – 95 1.08
10. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to
banks, financial institutions and debenture holders.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were obtained other than temporary deployment pending
application.
12. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the
Company, we report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been
used during the year for long-term investment.
13. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records examined by us, securities/ charges have been created in
respect of the debentures issued.
14. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and
no fraud on the Company was noticed or reported during the year.
For Deloitte Haskins & Sells,
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 117364W)
R. Salivati
Partner
Mumbai, dated, 29th April, 2011 (Membership No. 34004)
|