Real-time Stock quotes, portfolio, LIVE TV and more.
-1.75 (-0.68%)
-0.5 (-0.19%) | Auditor's Report (MMTC Ltd) | Year End : Mar '12 |
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MMTC Limited as at
March 31, 2012, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow
Statement for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto in
which are incorporated the accounts of Corporate Office, Mica Division,
Jhandewalan Regional Office and Sub-Regional Offices which are under
Jhandewalan Regional Office audited by us and the other Regional
Offices and Sub-Regional Offices audited by the other Auditors. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) and read together with the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2004 (hereinafter referred to as the order) issued by the Central
Government of India in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act,
1956 and on the basis of such checks of the records of the Company as
we considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure, a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph
(3) above, we report as follows: -
(i) Non-provision of liability, if any, in case of extension of time /
waiver / write off of GR-1 forms. (Refer note no. 23)
(ii) Balances under Sundry Debtors/claims Recoverable / Loans &
Advances / Sundry Creditors / Other Liabilities have not been confirmed
in some cases by the parties. Adjustments, if any, required upon such
confirmation are not ascertainable. (Refer note no. 39)
(iii) Our observations in respect of the inadequacies in the internal
control systems, as stated in para (iv) of Annexure to main audit
report, which may have consequential effect on the accounts for the
year. (Effect not ascertainable).
(iv) Attention is invited to an ad-hoc provision of Rs. 1002.05 million
made on account of certain acts of commission & omission pertaining to
recoverable from debtors at Regional Office Chennai. (Refer note no.
17)
5. We further report that: -
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit except as otherwise stated in report;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law, have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of the
books;
(c) Proper returns, adequate for the purpose of our audit have been
received from Regional Offices, Sub Regional Offices and Branches not
audited by us. Reports of Regional Auditors have been considered while
preparing our report;
(d) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
accounts and with the audited returns from the Regional Offices;
(e) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(f) Being a Government Company, pursuant to the gazette notification
No.GSR 829 (E) dated 21-10-2003 issued by Government of India,
provisions of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the
companies Act 1956 are not applicable to the company.
6. We further report that, the impact of paragraphs 4(i) to 4(iii)
above on the profit of the year and the assets and liabilities
appearing in the Balance Sheet, could not be ascertained. In our
opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
Significant Accounting Policies and notes thereon, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required, other
than as stated above, and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2012;
(ii) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit of
the Company for the year ended on that date; and
(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report
Referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditor''s Report of even date to the
members of MMTC Limited on the financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2012.
(i) In respect of fixed assets:
(a) The Company has generally maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the fixed
assets.
(b) As explained to us, all the fixed assets have been physically
verified by the Management during the year; which, in our opinion is
reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the nature of
its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no substantial part of the fixed assets has been disposed
off by the Company during the year and therefore the going concern
assumption is not affected.
(ii) In respect of its inventories:
(a) As explained to us, the inventories excepting in case of goods in
transit, stocks lying in Central / State Warehouses (where confirmation
were obtained from the parties and relied upon) were physically
verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion, procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the Management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of records of the inventory, in our
opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stock and
the books of account were not material except in the case of inventory
of pulses at Regional Office Mumbai which has been properly dealt with
in the books of account.
(iii) In respect of loans:
(a) As informed to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured
or unsecured to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.In
view of this, sub clauses (b),(c) and (d) of clause (iii) are not
applicable.
(b) As informed to us, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
unsecured from Companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. In
view of this, sub clauses (e), (f) and (g) of clause (iii) are not
applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods &
services. However, there is inadequate internal control systems
in-regard to obtaining confirmation / reconciliation of outstanding
balances, accounting of tax deducted at source on payments made by
other parties. Further, on the basis of our examination and according
to the information and explanations given to us, we have come across
instances where there is total lack of internal control system
particularly at Regional Office Chennai, Regional Office Hyderabad and
Jhandewalan Regional Office in areas of obtaining bank balance
confirmation, confirmations of FDR / BG, procedure / system for
obtaining buyer''s credit, forward cover.
Further, the internal control mechanism needs to be strengthened,
besides the areas mentioned hereinbefore, in the following areas:
(a) Risk management particularly of foreign exchange exposure and its
subsequent documentation / record keeping and also time-to-time
monitoring of the risk to the company.
(b) Periodic quantitative reconciliation of goods traded by the company
(particularly bullion) between the ERP and other standalone inventory
system.
(c) Active and prompt follow-up of old debts, advances, claims, court
cases and recoveries etc arising out of execution of decrees/awards in
favor of the company, by respective Commodity Division.
(v) (a) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no contracts and arrangements
referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act 1956, particulars of
which need to be entered into a register maintained under Section 301
of the Act.
(b) Accordingly the provisions of the clause V (b) of paragraph 4 of
the order (as amended) are not applicable to the company
(vi) The directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the
provisions of Section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there-under have been
complied with, in respect of deposits accepted from the Public. We have
been informed that, no order has been passed by Company Law Board or
National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any other
Court or Tribunal in this regard.
(vii) The Company has an internal audit system, which in our opinion is
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.
However, keeping in view our observations regarding inadequacies in
internal control systems, the internal audit system needs to be
revamped, strengthened and its effectiveness be enhanced.
(viii) As informed to us, the maintenance of cost records under Section
209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 has not been prescribed by the
Central Government.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records as produced and examined by us, in our opinion, the Company
is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and
protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax,
wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues as applicable with the appropriate authorities
and that no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the same were in
arrears as at 31-03-2012 for a period of more than six months from the
date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of dues of
income tax / sales tax / wealth tax / service tax / custom duty /
excise duty / cess (as applicable) as at March 31, 2012 which have not
been deposited on account of any dispute, are referred to in Annexure
''A''
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses and has not
incurred cash losses in the current financial year and in the
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) According to the records of the Company examined by us and as per
the information
and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in
repayment of dues to any financial institution or bank or debenture
holders during the year.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities; except
certain loans to employees who have been granted on the basis of
security of house and vehicles and in this regard proper documents &
records are maintained. In respect of loans to its employees other than
those as stated already, are granted without any security.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not chit fund or a Nidhi / Mutual
benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not
applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the terms & conditions of the guarantee given by the
company for loans taken by Neelachal Ispat Nigam Limited (an associate
Company) from banks or financial institutions are not prima- facie
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(xvi) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not taken any term loans during the year. Hence, the
provisions of clause 4(xvi) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that
no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year covered by our audit report, the Company has not issued any
debentures during the year and hence, the provision of clause No.
4(xix) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order 2003 (as amended) is
not applicable to the Company.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by way of Public Issue during
the year; therefore the provision of clause 4(xx) of the Companies
(Auditor''s Report) Order 2003 (as amended) is not applicable to the
Company.
(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have come across following instances of
material fraud on the Company during the year, as reported by the
Management:-
(a) Regional Office, Chennai Certain acts of commission & omission
relating to bullion transactions pertaining to previous years were
reported resulting into amounts recoverable from Debtors of Rs. 1002.05
million which were lying in the vendors account as at March 31, 2011
against which full provision has been created in the current year. The
company has ordered a special audit into these transactions which is
yet to be completed. In this connection, upon a complaint filed by the
Company, CBI has registered two separate FIRs and has started detailed
investigation also, Directorate of Enforcement have registered an
offence under Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002. (Refer Note no.
17)
(b) Regional Office, Mumbai
A foreign supplier has submitted forged shipping documents, through
banking channels, to obtain payment of Rs. 28.30 million without making
delivery. However, the company has obtained an interim stay from the
Court restraining the bank from making the payment under the letter of
credit. The same supplier is also fraudulently holding on to the master
bill of lading which would enable the RO to take delivery and
possession of goods valued at Rs. 64.57 million, already paid for and
received at the Indian port. (Refer to note no. 40)
(c) Regional Office, Hyderabad
The company has received fake bills of lading covering two shipments of
copper valued at Rs. 37.50 million against which no material was
received. The foreign supplier has been paid in full through letter of
credit after the company had received full payment from the customer.
The company is in the process of initiating legal action against the
foreign supplier. (Refer note no. 41)
(d) Regional Office, Jhandewalan
One of the customer who was given gold on loan has committed fraud on
the company by providing fake bank guarantees amounting to Rs. 18.0
million against which full provision has been made. The case is under
investigation upon filing of an FIR by the company with the Delhi
Police. (Refer note no. 42)
ANNEXURE ''A'' TO AUDITORS'' REPORT
Referred to in paragraph 9(b) of Annexure, a statement on the matters
specified in the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended)
of MMTC Limited for the year ended on 31st March 2012.
According to the records of the company dues of Income Tax, Sales Tax,
Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess which have not been deposited on
account of disputes are stated below:
CHENNAI REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of
the dues Amount
(In Rs.) Period Forum of
Dispute
TNGST ACT Sales Tax,
Penalty 8,63,114 1998-99 High Court
& Interest
TNGST ACT Sales Tax,
Penalty 4,43,416 2000-01 Sales Tax
Appeals
& Interest Tribunal
TNGST ACT Sales Tax,
Penalty 11,52,785 1999-2000 High Court
& Interest
TNGST ACT Sales Tax,
Penalty 1,78,536 2001-02 Asst.
Commissioner
& Interest (Comm. Tax),
Chennai
MUMBAI REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of
the dues Amount
(In Rs.) Period Forum of Dispute
BST ACT Sales Tax 3,08,644 1986-87 Joint Comm. of
Sales Tax
BST ACT Sales Tax 5,19,887 1987-88 Joint Comm. of
Sales Tax
BST ACT Sales Tax 1,33,907 1988-89 Joint Comm. of
Sales Tax
BST ACT Sales Tax 14,96,06,778 1989-90 MST Tribunal
BST ACT Sales Tax 23,30,46,478 1990-91 Dy. Comm.,
Sales Tax
BST ACT Sales Tax 28,98,738 1991-92 Dy. Comm.,
Sales Tax
BST ACT Sales Tax 11,14,933 1992-93 MST Tribunal
BST ACT Sales Tax 45,03,961 2001-02 Dy. Comm.,
Sales Tax
Central
Excise Act Service Tax 1,14,38,000 2008-09 Comm. Central
Excise &
Customs
DELHI REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of
the dues Amount
(In Rs.) Period Forum of Dispute
Delhi Sales
Tax Sales Tax 11,65,303 1984-85 D.C. appeal
Delhi
Sales Tax Sales Tax 6,18,17,683 1986-87 Addl.
Commissioner
Central
Sales Tax Sales Tax 39,14,524 1986-87 Addl.
Commissioner
Delhi Sales
Tax Sales Tax 4,03,31,557 1987-88 Addl.
Commissioner
Central
Sales Tax Sales Tax 28,54,992 1987-88 Addl.
Commissioner
Delhi Sales
Tax Sales Tax 369,45,148 1988-89 Addl.
Commissioner
Central
Sales Tax Sales Tax 33,51,524 1988-89 Addl.
Commissioner
Delhi Sales
Tax Sales Tax 16,35,160 1987-88 Joint
Commissioner
HYDERABAD REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of the Amount (In Period Forum of
Dispute
dues Rs.)
APGST Sales Tax 1,49,770 1989-90 STAT
APGST Sales Tax 29,61,551 1990-91 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 24,02,576 1991-92 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 13,96,269 1992-93 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 17,62,687 1992-93 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 6,30,615 1993-94 STAT, Vizag
CST Central Sales 4,41,34476 1993-94 ADC (CT)
Tax
CST Central Sales 2,04,481 1994-95 AC(LTU)
Tax
CST Central Sales 5,97,266 1995-96 ADC (CT)
Tax
APGST Sales Tax 38,03,875 1995-96 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 28,80,309 1995-96 STAT, Vizag
CST Central Sales 21,34,306 1996-97 STAT, Vizag
Tax
APGST Sales Tax 58,43,100 1997-98 STAT, Vizag
CST Central Sales 6,35,504 1997-98 ADC (CT)
Tax
APGST Sales Tax 55,65,147 1998-99 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 39,04,454 1999-2000 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 2,52,926 2000-2001 STAT, Vizag
APGST Sales Tax 2,12,176 2001-02 AC(LTU)
APGST Sales Tax 68,901 2002-03 AC(LTU)
APGST Sales Tax 34,856 2003-04 AC(LTU)
APGST Sales Tax 1,26,000 2004-05 AC(LTU )
VAT VAT 6,76,058 2006-07 STAT
VAT VAT 71,000 2007-08 AC(LTU)
VAT VAT 5,00,000 2008-09 STAT, Vizag
VAT VAT 11,90,100 2008-09 STAT, Vizag
Central
Excise & Custom Duty 24,11,17,719 2008-09 Commissioner of
Customs Customs &
Central
Excise
BHUBANESHWAR REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of
the dues Amount (In Period Forum of
Dispute
Rs.)
Orissa
Sales Tax Interest
Penalty 9,58,035 1966-67 High Court
of Orissa
Orissa
Sales Tax Interest
Penalty 26,50,388 1978-79 High Court
of Orissa
Orissa
Sales Tax Interest
Penalty 6,53,452 1979-80 High Court
Of Orissa
Orissa
Sales Tax CST 33,04,073 1981-82 High Court
Of Orissa
Orissa
Sales Tax Orissa Sales
Tax 78,46,464 1982-83 High Court
Of Orissa
Orissa
Sales Tax Orissa
Sales Tax 3,16,921 1982-83 High Court
Of Orissa
Orissa
Sales Tax Central
Sales Tax 34,83,020 1982-83 -- do ---
Orissa Sales
Tax Interest 2,62,819 1982-83 -- do ---
Orissa
Sales Tax Orissa Sales
Tax 79,13,807 1983-84 -- do ---
Orissa Sales
Tax Orissa Sales
Tax 3,29,926 1983-84 -- do ---
Orissa
Sales Tax Orissa
Sales Tax 35,42,822 1983-84 -- do ---
Orissa Sales
Tax Orissa Sales
Tax 86,48,326 1984-85 -- do ---
Orissa Sales
Tax Orissa Sales
Tax 3,69,294 1984-85 -- do ---
Orissa
Sales Tax Central
Sales Tax 57,96,808 1984-85 -- do ---
Orissa
Sales Tax Interest 3,57,42,030 1978-79 -- do ---
Orissa
Sales Tax Orissa
Sales Tax 21,17,92,315 2010-11 Appeal before
Commissioner of
Sales Tax, Cuttack
Central
Excise Act Service
Tax 7,27,02,132 2003-06 Customs, Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate
Tribunal
Central
Excise Act Service
Tax 13,08,31,221 2003-07 Customs,
Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate
Tribunal
Central
Excise Act Service
Tax 2,539,812,711 2007-08 Customs,
Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate
Tribunal
Central
Excise Act Service
Tax 5,80,77,352 2008-10 Customs,
Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate
Tribunal
Central
Excise Act Service
Tax 4,48,93,394 2010-11 Customs,
Excise &
Service Tax
Appellate
Tribunal
JAIPUR REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of
the dues Amount
(In Rs.) Period Forum of
Dispute
R.S.T ACT Sales Tax 1,28,87,058/- 2003-04 Rajasthan
Tax Board
(Rs 298
7058 deposited
under
protest)
R.S.T ACT Sales Tax 5,32,992/- 2003-04 Rajasthan
Tax Board
(Rs 53300
deposited
under protest)
R.S.T ACT Sales Tax 26,07,605/- 1999-00 Rajasthan
Tax Board
RAJ VAT ACT VAT ACT 326,47,269/- 2010-11 DC(Appeals)
CST ACT CST Act 59,92,494/- 2010-11 DC(Appeals)
VIZAG REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of the
Statue Nature of
the dues Amount
(In Rs.) Period Forum of
Dispute
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 18,56,325 1968-69 A.P. High
Court
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 26,39,647 1981-82 ADC, Vizag
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 6,88,552 1982-83 ADC, Vizag
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 17,66,784 1983-84 ADC
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 30,00,436 1984-85 ADC
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 25,05,806 1985-86 STAT,HYD
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 2,70,83,841 1986-87 STAT,
Hyderabad
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 36,45,076 1987-88 ADC
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 19,34,139 1991-92 STAT,HYD
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 4,79,000 1989-90 A.P. High
Court
CST Sales Tax 8,41,695 1994-95 STAT,
Hyderabad
CST Sales Tax 48,62,340 1995-96 STAT,
Hyderabad
CST Sales Tax 33,58,889 1996-97 STAT,
Hyderabad
A.P.G.S.T ACT Sales Tax 25,27,960 1997-98 STAT,
Hyderabad
CST Sales Tax 28,07,578 1997-98 STAT,
Hyderabad
CST Sales Tax 104,614 2007-08 STAT,
Hyderabad
Central
Excise & Service Tax 12,65,26,554 2003 -2006 Customs,
Excise &
Customs Service Tax
Appellate
Tribunal,
Bangalore
KOLKATA REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of
the Statue Nature of
the dues Amount
(In Rs.) Period Forum of
Dispute
WBST ACT
1994 --do-- 86,88,778 1996-97 Sales Tax
Tribunal
WBST ACT
1994 --do-- 33,74,028 1997-98 Appellate Board
WBST ACT
1994 --do-- 37,11,769 1998-99 Sales Tax
Tribunal
CST ACT
1956 Sales Tax 11,30,858 2005-06 Appellate Board
CST ACT
1956 Sales Tax 77,60,971 2006-07 DC Appeal
WB VAT ACT VAT 8,28,126 2008-09 DC Appeal
CST ACT 1956 Sales Tax 2,05,9794 2008-09 DC Appeal
JHANDEWALAN REGIONAL OFFICE
Name of
the Statue Nature of
the dues Amount (In Period Forum of Dispute
Rs.)
Delhi VAT CST/LST/
Interest/
Penalty 4,90,85,551 1997-98 Appellate Tribunal
(Gold
commemorative VAT, Delhi
Medallions)
37,45,290 2002-03 Commissioner, DVAT
UP-VAT VAT Interest
for non- 2,88,866 1995-96 Allahabad
High Court
submission
of Form - 3B 6,11,808 1996-97 Allahabad
High Court
(Gold) &
Non-submission
of Form 2,49,828 2007-08 Commissioner,
UP-VAT
3C1 (Mentha Oil)
Customs Customs Duty
& Interest 2,72,67,919 1999-2000 Delhi High Court
Department,
Delhi on non-
export of Gold
Jewellery
against gold
loan taken
by associates
Date: 28th August, 2012 For JAIN KAPILA ASSOCIATES
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Place: New Delhi Firm Registration No. 000287N
D.K. Kapila
Sr. Partner
M. No. 016905 |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited | |
![]() | |