1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MERCATOR LINES
LIMITED as at March 31, 2011, the related profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and signifcant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, issued
by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the Companies
Act, 1956, and on the basis of such checks as considered appropriate
and according to the information and explanations given to us during
the course of the audit, we enclose in the Annexure hereto a statement
on the matters specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in above
paragraph, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
b) In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of the
books of the Company;
c) The Balance Sheet, profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by the report are in agreement with the books of
account of the Company;
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, profit and Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement comply with the mandatory Accounting Standards
referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
of the Company as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board
of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
March 31, 2011, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section
274(1) (g) of the Companies Act, 1956.
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
Notes to Accounts in Schedule ''I'', give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
a. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
b. In the case of the profit and Loss Account, of the loss for the year
ended on that date,
c. In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash fows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
Statement referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditors'' Report of even
date to the Members of MERCATOR LINES LIMITED on the accounts for the
year ended March 31, 2011.
On the basis of such checks as considered appropriate and in terms of
the information and explanations given to us, we state as under:
1(a) The company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of the fxed assets.
1(b) As explained to us, the management at reasonable intervals carries
out the physical verification of the fxed assets. The discrepancies
noticed on such verification, which were not material, have been
appropriately dealt with in the accounts.
1(c) According to the information and explanations given by the
management and on the basis of audit procedures performed by us, we are
of the opinion that the disposal of fxed assets has not affected the
going concern of the company.
2(a) As explained to us, the inventories of bunker and lube have been
physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion,
having regard to the nature and location of stocks, the frequency of
the physical verification is reasonable.
2(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of the above
mentioned inventory followed by the management are reasonable and
adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
2(c) In our opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of
inventory and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification.
3(a) As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to companies, frms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. Hence, provisions of clauses 3(b), 3(c), 3(d)
are not applicable to the company.
3(e) As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from Companies, frms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. Hence, provisions of Clauses 3(f) and 3(g) are
not applicable to the company.
4. In our opinion and as explained to us, there are adequate internal
control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and the
nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventory and fxed
assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the course of our
audit, no major weakness has been noticed in the internal control
system and there is no continuing failure for the same.
5(a) As per information and explanations given by the management and
based on the audit procedures applied by us, during the year the
company has not entered into any contracts or arrangements referred to
in section 301 of the Act. Hence, clauses 5(a) and 5(b) are not
applicable to the company
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from public during the
year.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
8. The maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed by the
Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies act,
1956.
9(a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records examined by us, the Company is regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, employees'' state
insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, custom duty,
excise-duty, cess and other statutory dues and there are no undisputed
statutory dues outstanding as at March 31, 2011, for a period of more
than six months from the date they became payable.
9(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
disputed statutory dues that have not been deposited on account of
disputed matters pending before appropriate authorities are as under:
Name of the Statute Nature of the dues Amounth Year/s to which the
(Rs. In
lakhs) amount relates
Service Tax under Service Tax 6,809.00 2006-07 to 2009-10
Finance Act, 1994
Income Tax Income Tax 597.47 2006-07
47.67 2002-03
Name of the Statute Forum where dispute is pending
Service Tax under
Finance Act, 1994 Commissioner of Service tax
Income Tax Commissioner of
Income tax(Appeals)
(Also refer Notes 3 and 4 of Schedule I)
10. The company does not have any accumulated losses as on March 31,
2011 and has not incurred any cash losses during the financial year and
in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. Based on the information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not defaulted in repayment of any dues to financial institutions,
banks or debenture holders.
12. Based on our examination of the records and as explained to us,
the Company has not granted any loans and/or advances on the basis of
security byway of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund, nidhi/mutual
beneft fund/society The provisions of clause 4(xiii) are therefore not
applicable to the company.
14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has during the year not dealing or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments. All shares, debentures
and other investments are held by the company in its own name
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantees for
loans taken by subsidiaries from banks and financial institutions are,
considering the long term involvement of the company in these entities,
not prejudicial to the interests of the company.
16. According to the information and explanation given to us, term
loans raised during the year were applied for the purpose for which the
loans were obtained.
17. As explained to us and on an overall examination of the balance
sheet of the Company, in our opinion there are no funds raised on
short-term basis which have been used for long-term investment by the
Company.
18. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has made preferential allotment of shares/ warrants to parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 at prices not prejudicial to the interests of the company.
19. During the period covered by our audit, the company has not issued
any Secured Debentures.
20. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
period covered by our report.
21. Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during
the course of our audit.
For and on behalf of
Contractor Nayak & Kishnadwala
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No 101961W
Himanshu Kishnadwala
Partner,
Membership No 37391
Mumbai
May 28, 2011
|