1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of MAN INFRACONSTRUCTION
LTD. as at 31st March, 2011 and also the Profit & Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These Financial Statements are the responsibility of the management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Financial
Statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, (the
Order), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, (the Act)
we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of the
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
the said books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Act.
(v) Based on representations made by the directors of the Company and
taken on record by the board, none of the directors of the Company are,
prima- facie, as at 31st March, 2011 disqualified from being appointed
as directors of the Company under clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
Section 274 of the Act on the said date;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the accounts read together with notes
thereon give the information required by the Act in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
a. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011,
b. In the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date, and
c. In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
annexure to the auditors report
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of its fixed
assets except for steel shuttering materials for which considering
nature of assets, maintenance of quantitative details is not feasible.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, most of
the fixed assets of the Company were physically verified by the
management during the year except for steel shuttering materials and no
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our
opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable having regard to
the size of the Company and the nature of its fixed assets.
(c) During the year, the Company has not disposed off any substantial
part of fixed assets.
(ii) The year-end inventory comprises of Construction Work- in-Progress
and construction materials. Considering the nature of construction work
and the manner in which the same is carried out, we are of the opinion
that verification of such materials and records maintained at sites are
adequate and proper. The Company has qualified engineers and architects
to supervise the work as well as to certify the work done by the
contractors. The Construction Work-in-Progress is recognised based on
such verification and certification. In our opinion, the procedure of
continuous verification and certification adopted by the management and
the records maintained are reasonable and adequate in relation to the
size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted unsecured loans to 2 (Two)
subsidiaries and 1 (One) joint venture Company covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount involved
during the year was Rs. 2,721.26 Lakhs and the balance at the end of the
year was Rs. 2,247.56 Lakhs.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest, wherever applicable and other terms
and conditions of loans covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Act are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest
of the Company.
(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
repayment schedules have been specified and accordingly the question of
regularity in repayment of principal amount, wherever applicable, does
not arise.
(d) As stated above, no repayment schedules have been specified and
there are no overdue amounts in excess of Rs. 1.00 Lakh.
(e) to (g) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured
from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Act, hence the question of
reporting under sub-clause (e) to (g) of clause 4(iii) of the Order
does not arise.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with
regards to purchases of the inventory, fixed assets and for sale of
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal controls.
(v) (a) On perusal of the information available with the Company and
based on explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the
particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 for
the year that needs to be entered into the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Act, have been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the registers maintained under Section 301 of
the Act, and exceeding the value of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs in respect of any
party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time to the
extent the same are available with the Company.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public and
therefore, the provisions of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant
provisions of the Act and Rules framed there under are not applicable
to the Company.
(vii) In our opinion, the internal audit function carried out during
the year by firms of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management
is commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business.
(viii)To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under
clause (d) of sub- section (1) of Section 209 of the Act for the
services of the Company.
(ix) (a) Based on the records produced before us, the Company is
generally regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed
statutory dues such as Provident Fund, Sales Tax, Income Tax, Service
Tax, Custom Duty and other material statutory dues wherever applicable
and there are no arrears as at 31st March, 2011 which were due for more
than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
are no dues of Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Custom
duty, Excise duty and Cess which have not been deposited on account of
any dispute except in the following:
(Rs. in Lakhs)
Name of the Nature of Dues Forum where Financial Year Amount
Statute dispute is
pending
TNGST Act,
1959 Penalty Hon.Sales Tax 2003-04 19.36
Appellate Tribunal
(Additional Bench),
Chennai
TNGST
Act,1959 Penalty Hon.Sales Tax 2004-05 17.53
Appellate Tribunal
(Additional Bench),
Chennai
KVAT
Rules, 2005 Value Added
Tax & Deputy 2007-08 57.43
Interest Commissioner
(Appeals),
Commercial Taxes,
Ernakulam, Kerala
KVAT
Rules, 2005 Value added
Tax & Deputy 2009-10 4.58
Interest Commissioner
(Appeals),
Commercial Taxes,
Ernakulum, Kerala
Income Tax
Act,1961 Income Tax
& Interest Deputy 2007-08 13.61
Commissioner of
Income Tax
Income Tax
Act,1961 Income Tax
& Interest Assistant 2008-09 121.50
Commissioner of
Income Tax
Wealth
Tax,1957 Wealth Tax
Liability Asst. Commissioner 2006-07 0.18
of Income Tax
(Wealth Tax)
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses in the financial year
and in the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and according to the information and
explanation given to us, we are of the opinion that the Company has not
defaulted in repayment of dues to financial institutions or banks.
(xii) The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis
of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /mutual benefit fund/
society. Therefore, clause 4(xiii) of the Order is not applicable to
the Company.
(xiv) The Company has maintained proper records of transactions and
contracts in respect of its dealing in securities, debentures and other
investments and timely entries have been made therein. All shares,
debentures and other investments have been held by the Company in its
own name.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company has not taken any term loans hence the question of
application of term loans does not arise.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, and
in our opinion, the funds raised on short- term basis have generally
not been used for long term investment.
(xviii)The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section
301 of the Act, during the year. Hence the question of reporting under
clause 4(xviii) of the Order regarding whether price at which shares
have been issued is prejudicial to the interest of the Company does not
arise.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures hence the question of
whether securities have been created does not arise.
(xx) We have verified the end use of money raised by public issues from
the draft prospectus filed with SEBI, the offer document and as
disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and
explanation given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by
the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For G. M. KAPADIA & CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No. 104767W
(ATUL SHAH)
Place: Mumbai Partner
Dated: 25th May, 2011 (Membership No. 39569)
|