1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of MAHALAXMI RUBTECH
LIMITED, as at 31st March, 2011, the profit and loss account and also
the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and
cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2011.
(b) In the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date and
(c) In the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE
(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) As explained to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the company. No
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) There was no disposal of substantial part of fixed assets during
the year.
(ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventory has been physically verified
during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of records of inventory, the
company has maintained proper records of inventory and no material
discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to the
companies, firms or other parties covered in register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly Para 4(iii) (b),
(c) and (d) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable.
(B) According to the information and explanation given to us company
has taken loans secured or unsecured from four companies, firms or
other parties covered in register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.The maximum amount involved during the year was
Rs.1329.16 lakhs and the year end balance of the loan taken from such
parties was Rs. 1158.04 lakhs.
(C) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
on which loans have been taken from companies, firms or other parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
(D) The company is regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and has been regular in the payment of interest.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business for the
purchases of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control
system.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to
be maintained under that section.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding Rupees five lakhs in respect of
any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not accepted any deposits during the year from the public
within the meaning of the provisions of section 58A, 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and rules made there
under.
vii) The company has an internal audit system during the year which in
our opinion is in commensurate with the size and nature of its
business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the cost records maintained by the
company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been maintained by the company.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, in
our opinion, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income
tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess
and other material statutory dues, applicable to the company have
generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, custom duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears as at 31st
March, 2011 for a period of more than six months from when they became
payable.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
disputed statutory dues that have not been deposited on account of
matters pending before apropriate authorities are as under:
Name of the Statute Amount in Forum where dispute is
(Lakhs) pending
Central Excise Duty 9.98 Appellate Tribunal
Textile Cess 11.12 High Court
Labour Suits 0.60 Labour Court
Income Tax 12.89 High Court
Income Tax 1.99 Appellate Tribunal
(x) There are no accumulated losses of the company as on 31st March,
2011. The company has not incurred cash losses during the financial
year covered by our audit and in the immediately preceding financial
year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution or banks during the year.
(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not granted any loans and advances on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other
securities.
(xiii) The provisions of any special statute as specified under clause
4 (xiii) of the Order are not applicable to the company.
(xiv) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures
and other investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4 (xiv)
of the Order are not applicable to the company.
(xv) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
term loans raised during the year have been applied for the purpose for
which they were raised.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for
long-term investment by the company.
(xviii) The company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xix) The company has not raised any money by way of public issues
during the year.
(xx) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
year.
For BHANWAR JAIN & CO.,
Chartered Accountants.
S/d
(B. M. JAIN)
Partner.
M.No.: 34943
AHMEDABAD: 19th May, 2011.
|