1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Lumax Auto
Technologies Limited as at 31st March, 2011, & also the Profit & Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed there to.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the company''s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in the paragraphs
4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
v) On the basis of written representations received from the Directors,
as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the
Directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011 from being appointed
as a director under clause (g) of sub- section (1) of section 274 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with other
notes appearing in schedule 23 and their impact on Balance Sheet,
Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true & fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2011;
b) in the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure To Auditors'' Report
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date Re:
Lumax Auto Technologies Limited
i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All the assets have not been physically verified by the management
during the year, but there is a regular planned program of verification
which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the
Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) Based on our scrutiny of the records of the Company and the
information and explanations received by us, we report that there were
sales of fixed assets during the year, but the fixed assets disposed
off did not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the
Company. Hence, the question of reporting whether the sale of any
substantial part of fixed assets has affected the going concern of the
Company does not arise.
ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventories have been physically
verified by the management at reasonable intervals during the year.
Further, for materials lying
with third parties, certificates confirming the stock held by them have
been obtained periodically in most of the cases. The frequency of
verification is reasonable.
(b) In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us, the
procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and the nature of its business.
(c) In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us, the
company is maintaining proper records of inventory. We have been
informed that no material discrepancies have been noticed on physical
verification of inventory as compared to book records.
iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has granted unsecured loan to one company covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 3.58 Lacs and the
year-end balance of the said loan was Rs. Nil.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the said
loan is interest free. However, the terms and conditions of loan given
are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(c) There was no any stipulation as to the time period for recovery of
principal amount of unsecured loan given.
(d) Further, as there was no any stipulation as to the time period for
recovery of principal amount of unsecured loans given, our comment on
the overdue amount in respect of the said loan are not required.
(e) During the year the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
unsecured from parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of
the Companies Act 1956. Hence, the question of reporting whether the
terms & conditions of such loans are prejudicial to the interest of the
Company, whether reasonable steps for repayment of over-dues of such
loans taken, maximum amount outstanding during the year and year-end
balance does not arise.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and
for sale of goods. During the course of our audit, we have not observed
any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control
system.
v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that transactions that need to be entered into the
register in pursuance of section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have
been so entered; and
(b) In respect of transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements exceeding the value of Rupees five lacs entered into
during the financial year, we are unable to comment whether the
transactions were made at prevailing market prices at the relevant time
because of the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and
in absence of any comparable prices.
vi) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, the company has not accepted deposits which are deposits
within the meaning of the Provisions of sections 58A and 58AA of the
Act and of Rule (2b) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules,
1975.
vii) In our opinion, the Company has an Internal Audit System
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.
viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been maintained. However, we have not made
detailed examination of the records with a view to determine whether
they are accurate or complete.
ix) According to the information and explanations given to us:
(a) the company is generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory
dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education & Protection Fund,
Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Sales Tax, Service
Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess or any other statutory dues with
the appropriate authorities during the year;
(b) no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund,
Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance,
Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty, Excise
Duty and Cess and any other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding
at the year end, for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable;
(c) there are no disputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund,
Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance,
Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Sales Tax, Customs Duty, Excise
Duty or Cess, by the Company.
x) The company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
xi) As informed to us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of
dues to financial institutions, banks.
xii) As informed to us, the company has not granted loans and advances
on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures or
other securities.
xiii) In our opinion, and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion
that the company is not a chit-fund, nidhi or mutual benefit
fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not
applicable to the company.
xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us by the
management of the Company, the company is not dealing or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the company.
xv) According to the information and explanations given to us by the
management of the Company, the Company has given guarantee for loans
taken by others from bank, the terms and conditions whereof are not
prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.
xvi) As informed to us, the proceeds of the term loans taken by the
company are applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.
xvii) In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us, the
funds raised by the company on short term basis have not been used for
long-term investment.
xviii) The company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. In our opinion, prices at which shares have
been issued are not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
xix) According to the records of the Company, during the year, the
Company has not issued any debentures.
xx) The company has not raised any money by public issues during the
period covered by our audit report.
xxi) Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the course of our audit.
For D. R. Barve & Company
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No. 101034W
CA. D. R. Barve
(Proprietor)
Membership No.17661
Place: Pune
Date : 27th May, 2011
|