1) The Company has received demand from the Income Tax Department for
Rs.7,569 lacs and Rs.5,936 lacs in respect of fnancial year 2006-07 and
2007-08 respectively. The Company has disputed the above demands and
the matter is pending at appellate stage with appropriate authorities.
Since the matter is disputed the Company has not provided for these
liabilities in its books, to that extent the Company has a Contingent
Liability. The above fgure does not include interest payable u/s. 220
of the Indian Income Tax Ac, 1961, which will be concluded depending on
the outcome of the appeal as well at the point of time when the outcome
is decided and taxes paid by the Company, to that extent the Contingent
Liability is unascertainable.
2) The provision for tax for the year is done considering the provision
of Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT). While working out the provision of
tax it is assumed that the claimed made by the Company during fnancial
year 2006-07 and 2007-08 will be upheld and decided in favour of the
Company, resulting in to the Company being eligible for claim of losses
in those years which can be used to set off the profits of the year. If
the tax dispute of fnancial year 2006-07 and 2007-08 are not decided in
favour of the Company then the provision for tax for the year will be
higher by Rs. 56 lacs and the resulting profit after tax lower by
similar amount.
3) No provision has been made for interest on delayed payments in terms
of agreements for purchase of land including Mr. Suresh Thanawala as
the claims are disputed and not acknowledged by the Company .The same
will be provided as and when the claims are settled with the parties
concerned. To that extent the Company has Contingent Liability the
amount of which is unascertainable.
4) No provision has been made in respect of contractual delays, lapses
and defaults committed by the Company in respect of various contracts
in the course of business. These delays, defaults and lapses are
generally accepted to occur in the real estate development business and
generally settled amicably by the parties. No provision for any
probable / additional cost, compensation or penalties are being made by
the Company, to that extent the Company has a Contingent Liability,
which is unascertainable.
5) The balances in creditors, debtors, secured and unsecured loans are
subject to confrmation. The management is of the opinion that all the
debtors, loans and advances refected in the fnancial statements are
fully realizable and that there is no impairment in them. During the
year under review balances in the accounts of the several debtors,
creditors and loan and advances have been written off, as in the
opinion of the management the same are no longer receivable/ payable.
The auditors have relied on the judgment of the management in this
regard.
6) The Company has undertaken an exercise to evaluate the impairment of
each inventory. On the basis of such exercise, the management is of the
opinion that all the inventories which are carried over in the Balance
Sheet are at their full realizable value. The auditors have relied on
the judgment of the management as to the impairment of inventories.
7) The Company has obtained legal advise that the overdue bills
discounted amounts and the construction loans received from customers
are not considered as Deposits in terms of section 58A of the Companies
Act, 1956. Accordingly they are classifed as Current Liabilities.
8) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES :
Please refer to Note numbered 2 (e), 2(f), 3, 4, 5 and 6 above.
9) MANAGERIAL REMUNERATION :
Remuneration to directors in accordance with the conditions specifed in
Schedule XIII of the Companies Act, 1956,– Rs. Nil ( previous year Rs.
Nil ).
10) Expenditure in foreign currency on account of travelling Rs.Nil /-
(previous year Rs.3.35 lacs).
11) Information pursuant to part II of Schedule VI to the Companies Act
12) Installments becoming due for sale of residential and commercial
units, the construction work of which is in progress and not
substantially completed are accounted as and when received under the
head “Current Liabilities”.
16) Related Parties disclosure : 1. Relationships:
(a) Key Management Personnel :
Mr. Darshan L. Gandhi Ms. Naina M. Shah
(b) Relatives of Key Management Personnel and their Enterprises
Mrs. Rajni L. Gandhi
Mrs. Shraddha D. Gandhi
(c) Associate Companies :
Bahar Housing Developers
L. L. Builders
LGNC Ltd.
Lok Builders
Lok Realty Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Remaking of Mumbai Housing Infrastructure & Finance Ltd.
Remaking of Mumbai Federation
Remaking of Mumbai Development Ltd.
Nirman Engineers
13) Items required to be reported under Schedule VI being nil or not
applicable are not reported herein.
14) Previous year’s fgures have been regrouped and restated wherever
necessary to confrm to this year’s classification. Figures in brackets
relates to previous year. |