1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of JINDAL DRILLING AND
INDUSTRIES LIMITED, as at 31 st March, 2011, and also the Profit and
Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that
date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India.Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
ouropinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 {as
amended by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004}
{hereinafter referred to as ''Order''} issued by the Central Government
of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies
Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub- section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to:
a) note number B4(ii) of schedule number 18 of notes to accounts
regarding outstanding dues of Rs.6586 lacs withheld by ONGC which has
been considered good by the management based on the legal opinion
obtained.
b) note number B5(i) of schedule number 18B of notes to accounts
regarding loan of Rs. 1087 lacs to one party which is subject to
confirmation.
(vii) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31 st March, 2011;
b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT
(As referred to in paragraph ''3'' of our report to the members of JINDAL
DRILLING AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED on the accounts as at & for the year
ended 31 st March 2011)
1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) In our opinion, certain fixed assets of the Company have been
physically verified by the management according to a phased programme
designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our
opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the
nature of fixed assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification as compared to the books of account.
c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern assumption.
2. (a) The inventory has been physicallyverified bythe management
during theyear.lnouropinion,thefrequencyofverification is reasonable.
b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
c) In our opinion, the Company is maintaining proper records of
inventory. As far as we could ascertain and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no material discrepancies
were noticed between the physical stock and the book records.
3. (a) As per the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has granted unsecured loan to one company covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 8930.34 lacs and the
year-end balance of loans granted to such parties was Rs. 8930.34
lacs.
b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
of such loans are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
c) The receipts of the principal amount and interest thereon is as
stipulated.
d) There is no overdue amount in respect of loan granted to such
parties.
e) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly clauses
4(iii) (f) and (g) of the order are not applicable.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there exists adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have neither
come across nor have we been informed of any continuing failure to
correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system of
the Company.
5. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts or
arrangements that need to be entered into the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.
b) As far as we could ascertain on the basis of our selective checking
and according to the information and explanations given to us, the
transactions made in pursuance of aforesaid contracts or arrangements
including those exceeding the aggregate amount of rupees five lacs in
respect of each party made during the year have been made at prices
which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public and
consequently the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the
provisions of section 58A, 58AA and other relevant provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable
to the Company.
7. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and
nature of its business.
8. According to information and explanations given to us, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under
clause(d) of subsection (1)of section 209 ofthe Companies Act, 1956.
9. (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund,
Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance,
Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise
Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it. However
an amount of Rs. 38,316 relating to Employees'' State Insurance in
respect of Gurgaon Office has not been deposited due to non allotment
of Employees'' State Insurance Sub-Code number by ESIC authorities.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
the basis of our examination ofthe books of accounts, no undisputed
amounts payable in respect of IncomeTax, Wealth Tax, Sales Tax, Custom
Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in arrears at the year-end for a period
of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records ofthe Company examined by us, there are no dues of Sales Tax,
Wealth Tax, Excise Duty and Cess which have not been deposited on
account of any dispute except the following in respect of Custom Duty,
IncomeTax and Service Tax along with the forum where the dispute is
pending:
Name of Nature of Amount Financial Forum where
Statute Dues (Rs. in
lacs) Year to which dispute
pending
amount
relates
Customs Act, 1964 Custom Duty 195.03* 1989-91 Custom
Department
including
penalty
Income Tax Act,
1961 IncomeTax 391.51 2006-07 Commissioner of
IncomeTax
(Appeals)
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 603.94 2007-08 CESTAT
*net of deposit of Rs. 60 lacs
10. The Company does not have any accumulated losses. The Company has
not incurred cash losses in the current financial year and in the
immediately preceding financial year.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any
financial institution or bank. The Company has not issued any
debentures during the year.
12. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/ mutual benefit
fund/society. Hence, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) ofthe Order are
not applicable to the Company.
14. In our opinion the Company is not primarily dealing in or trading
in shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly,
the provisions of clause 4(xiv) ofthe order are not applicable.
15. The Company has provided corporate guarantee amounting to US$
42.50 million (equivalent to Rs. 18946.50 lacs) to Axis Bank Limited,
Singapore Branch as a collateral security for providing financial
assistance to its two Joint Venture Companies, Discovery Drilling Pte.
Ltd., Singapore (DDPL) & Virtue Drilling Pte. Ltd., Singapore (VDPL).
Further, the Company has pledged its 100% investment in the DDPL and
VDPL to the lenders ofthe respective Joint Venture Companies. The terms
and conditions ofthe aforesaid arrangements are not, prima facie,
prejudicial to the interest ofthe Company.
16. On the basis of records made available and according to
information and explanations given to us, the Company has applied its
term loans for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination ofthe Balance Sheet ofthe Company, we report
that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term
investment.
18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
19. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
20. Since the Company has not raised any money during the year by way
of public issue, the provisions of clause 4(xx) of the Order are not
applicable to the Company.
21. Based upon the audit procedure performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and on the
basis of the information and explanations given by the management, we
report that no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported
during the course of our audit.
ForS.S.KOTHARIMEHTA&CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm''s Regn. No. 000756N
K.K.TULSHAN
Place: Gurgaon Partner
Date : 3rd August, 20011 Membership No. 085033
|